---
title: 'Directed to Reconsider its Death Penalty Statute, Alabama Appeals Court Upholds Constitutionality of 3 Death Sentences'
description: 'Directed by the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its rulings upholding the death sentences imposed upon four Alabama defendants, the Alabama Court of…'
canonical: 'https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/directed-to-reconsider-its-death-penalty-statute-alabama-appeals-court-upholds-constitutionality-of-3-death-sentences'
section: news
date: '2016-12-19T15:15:09-05:00'
updated: '2025-03-14T14:46:36-04:00'
source: 'Death Penalty Information Center'
---

! Directed by the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its rulings upholding the death sentences imposed upon four **Alabama** defendants, the **Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals** affirmed three of the death sentences on December 16. The state court ruled that the death sentences imposed upon **Ronnie Kirksey**, **Corey Wimbley**, and **Ryan Gerald Russell** do not violate the Supreme Court's January 16, 2016 decision in [***Hurst v. Florida***](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/u-s-supreme-court-strikes-down-floridas-death-sentencing-scheme). It has not yet ruled on the constitutionality of the death sentence imposed on **Bart Johnson** in the fourth case. In *Hurst*, the Supreme Court ruled that “\[t\]he Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death. A jury’s mere recommendation is not enough.” In that case, the Court struck down Florida's capital sentencing law, ruling that it unconstitutionally reserved for the judge, rather than the jury, the ultimate power to decide whether the prosecution had proven the existence of aggravating circumstances that would make the defendant eligible for the death penalty. In late January, three Justices noted in connection with a decision denying a stay of execution to Alabama death-row prisoner [**Christopher Brooks**](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-7786_n7io.pdf) that *Hurst* had overruled the decisions upon which the Court had relied in previously upholding Alabama's judge-sentencing statute. The Court later vacated the Alabama court's decisions upholding the four death sentences, sending them back to the Alabama courts for reconsideration in light of the *Hurst* decision. In August and October, the **[Delaware](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/delaware-supreme-court-hears-oral-argument-on-constitutionality-of-its-death-penalty-statute)** and [**Florida**](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/florida-supreme-court-strikes-down-states-capital-sentencing-statute-requires-jury-unanimity-before-imposing-death) Supreme Courts ruled that other portions of their statutes that permitted judges to override jury recommendations of a life sentence or impose death sentences after a non-unanimous jury sentencing recommendation violated *Hurst*, leaving Alabama as the only state that continues to allow either practice. In issuing its opinions, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals distinguished its law from the Florida statute the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional in *Hurst*, saying that as part of the decision finding a defendant guilty of capital murder, Alabama juries already unanimously find facts that prove a penalty-phase aggravating circumstance and make the defendant eligible for the death penalty. Without addressing the rulings of the Delaware and Florida state courts, the court of appeals upheld Alabama's provisions allowing non-unanimous juries to recommend a death sentence and permitting judges to override a jury's recommendation of a life sentence. The state court said that the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances is not a finding of fact, so *Hurst* does not apply to the jury's sentencing recommendation or the sentence ultimately imposed by the judge. It also noted that in Kirksey's and Russell's cases, the sentencing juries had unanimously recommended death.

(K. Faulk, "[Alabama court rules death penalty law constitutional in 3 cases SCOTUS sent back for review](http://www.al.com/news/birmingham/index.ssf/2016/12/alabama_court_rules_death_pena.html)," AL.com, December 17, 2016.) See [**Sentencing** ](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/data/sentencing-data)and [**U.S. Supreme Court**](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/policy/united-states-supreme-court). [Read](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/Russell-Opinion.pdf) the opinion in *State v. Russell*; [read](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/Kirksey-Opinion.pdf) the opinion in *State v. Kirksey*; [read](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/Wimbley.pdf) the opinion in *State v. Wimbley*.