Publications & Testimony

On April 16, 2026, Singapore exe­cut­ed 46-year-old Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj for import­ing 1,009 grams of cannabis, an offense that car­ries a manda­to­ry death sen­tence under the country’s Misuse of Drugs Act, which impos­es cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment for import­ing more than 500 grams. His exe­cu­tion marks the eighth car­ried out for drug-relat­ed offens­es in 2026, already exceed­ing half of the fif­teen drug-relat­ed exe­cu­tions record­ed in all of 2025. Although the court determined…

DPI’s​“What to Know” series exam­ines cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment from mul­ti­ple angles, one top­ic at a time. Each install­ment pro­vides essen­tial facts and data on spe­cif­ic aspects of the death penal­ty. Why it Matters: In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held that exe­cut­ing indi­vid­u­als with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. (*Atkins v. Virgina)**.* Before that deci­sion, dozens of peo­ple with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties were legally executed.

By the time 21-year-old Clarence Curtis Jordan shot a man dur­ing a gro­cery store bur­glary in 1977, he had been strug­gling for most of his life with hal­lu­ci­na­tions and intel­lec­tu­al deficits. His IQ score placed him in the bot­tom 0.5% of the pop­u­la­tion. He iden­ti­fied the pres­i­dent as​“John Hill” and said he often saw​“old, weird, burnt-up look­ing peo­ple” watch­ing him. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) found him incom­pe­tent to be exe­cut­ed in 1988. But Mr.

On April 7, 2026, a Cuyahoga County judge vacat­ed the death sen­tence of Charles Maxwell and ordered his resen­tenc­ing to life in prison with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. After an evi­den­tiary hear­ing, the court found that Mr. Maxwell suf­fered from delu­sion­al dis­or­der, caused by sev­er­al trau­mat­ic brain injuries, at the time of the crime for which he was sen­tenced to death. According to data from the Ohio Attorney General’s office, Mr. Maxwell’s resen­tenc­ing marks the…

2025 marked the high­est num­ber of drug-relat­ed exe­cu­tions world­wide since Harm Reduction International (HRI) began report­ing num­bers in 2007. In its new report, The Death Penalty for Drug Offenses: Global Overview 2025, HRI explains that a​“small but res­olute group of coun­tries” are respon­si­ble for a record 1,212 exe­cu­tions, which is like­ly an under­count due to secre­cy laws in the high appli­ca­tion nations of China, North Korea, and Vietnam pre­vent­ing disclosure of…

With weeks left before his sched­uled exe­cu­tion on May 21, 2026, coun­sel for Tennessee death-sen­­tenced pris­on­er Tony Carruthers has asked the Tennessee Supreme Court to order DNA test­ing that they argue could prove their client’s inno­cence. On April 9, lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed an emer­gency motion seek­ing DNA test­ing​“on spe­cif­ic pieces of pro­ba­tive phys­i­cal evi­dence, most of which has nev­er been test­ed, and which will like­ly point to…

In April 2025, the Death Penalty Information Center (DPI) released Immature Minds in a​“Maturing Society”: Roper v. Simmons at 20, which found that “[a] mean­ing­ful exam­i­na­tion of all the evi­dence sug­gests that 18‑, 19- and 20-year-olds are equal­ly deserv­ing as those under 18 to be exclud­ed from death penal­ty eli­gi­bil­i­ty.” Included in the report was an analy­sis of trends in sen­tenc­ing and exe­cu­tions of defen­dants age 18 to 20 based on twen­ty years of data, from the…

Ohio’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment sys­tem has come into sharp focus with the release of two reports that exam­ine four decades of the state’s death penal­ty record and draw stark­ly dif­fer­ent con­clu­sions about the future of Ohio’s death penal­ty. On March 30, Ohioans to Stop Executions (OTSE) pub­lished Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Confronting the Wrongful Conviction Crisis in the State of Ohio, doc­u­ment­ing the record of mis­takes and errors that result­ed in 12 exon­er­a­tions.​“The death…

Idaho law empow­ers state courts to review and block cer­tain gov­ern­ment actions, such as those imposed with­out notice or pub­lic input, as well as pol­i­cy changes that are​“arbi­trary, capri­cious, or an abuse of dis­cre­tion.” However, a bill signed March 31 by Gov. Brad Little (R) exempts exe­cu­tion pro­ce­dures from these over­sight require­ments. If the prison direc­tor decides to alter the exe­cu­tion pro­to­col, death-sen­­tenced pris­on­ers will only be able to challenge those…

DPI’s​“What to Know” series exam­ines cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment from mul­ti­ple angles, one top­ic at a time. Each install­ment pro­vides essen­tial facts and data on spe­cif­ic aspects of the death penal­ty. Why it mat­ters:The race of vic­tims weighs heav­i­ly in cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment deci­sions. Studies con­firm that defen­dants with white vic­tims are more like­ly to be charged cap­i­tal­ly, sen­tenced to death, have those sen­tences upheld on appeal, and be exe­cut­ed. ​“The strongest…