---
title: 'Life Verdict or Hung Jury? How States Treat Non-Unanimous Jury Votes in Capital-Sentencing Proceedings'
description: 'As of January 17, 2018 In 2016, the Supreme Courts of Florida and Delaware declared their death-penalty statutes to be unconstitutional because they…'
canonical: 'https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/life-verdict-or-hung-jury-how-states-treat-non-unanimous-jury-votes-in-capital-sentencing-proceedings-1'
section: stories
date: '2018-01-17T11:44:00-05:00'
updated: '2025-03-14T14:58:13-04:00'
source: 'Death Penalty Information Center'
---

As of January 17, 2018

In 2016, the Supreme Courts of Florida and Delaware declared their death-penalty statutes to be unconstitutional because they permitted trial judges to impose the death penalty based upon a sentencing jury's non-unanimous recommendation for death. Those decisions left Alabama as the only state that permitted trial judges to impose a death sentences based upon a jury's non-unanimous sentencing recommendation.

But Alabama is not the only state that permits judges to decide what sentence to impose if a capital-sentencing jury cannot reach a unanimous sentencing verdict. Missouri and Indiana consider the lack of unanimity to constitute a "hung jury" and then mandate that the court independently decide what sentence to impose if a capital-sentencing jury cannot reach a unanimous sentencing verdict.

No Missouri jury has imposed a death sentence since 2013, but Missouri state trial judges imposed death sentences in two cases in a four-month period between late 2017 and early 2018 under this hung-jury provision. In October 2017, a St. Charles County trial judge [sentenced Marvin Rice to death](https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/missouri-judge-sentences-defendant-to-death-after-11-jurors-had-voted-for-life-sentence) after his jury deadlocked 11-1 in favor of a life sentence. In January 2018, a Greene County trial judge sentenced Craig Wood to death after his jury deadlocked 10-2 in favor of death.

DPIC has reviewed the death-penalty statutes of the 31 states that permit capital punishment and the federal death penalty statute to determine how each jurisdiction proceeds when a capital-sentencing jury does not reach a unanimous verdict in the penalty phase of a capital trial. This is what we found:

The laws of **more than 70% of jurisdictions** that permit capital punishment (22 states, plus the federal government) mandate an automatic life sentence if a jury cannot reach a unanimous sentencing verdict. Five states allow the state another opportunity to seek death with a new sentencing hearing before another jury. Two other states—Indiana and Missouri—remove the sentencing decision from the jury following a deadlock and transfer the decision-making authority to the judge. Another two states—Montana and Nebraska—reserve the sentencing power to the judge in all death-penalty cases.

Here is a state-by-state breakdown of the applicable law: