Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

May 092017

White Texas Judge Reprimanded for Facebook Comment Suggesting A Tree And A Rope” For Black Murder Suspect

The Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct has issued a for­mal rep­ri­mand to a sit­ting Burnet County judge who post­ed on Facebook a pho­to of a black mur­der sus­pect accused of killing a police offi­cer with the com­ment,​“Time for a tree and a rope.” Judge James Oakley (pic­tured), who is white, denied that the com­ment about Otis Tyrone McKane was a race-based ref­er­ence to lynch­ing.​“My com­ment was intend­ed to reflect my per­son­al feel­ings that this…

Read More

News 

May 082017

After Remand from U.S. Supreme Court, Georgia Federal Court Vacates Brain-Damaged Prisoner’s Death Sentence

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has over­turned the death sen­tence imposed on Lawrence Jefferson, say­ing that his tri­al coun­sel had been inef­fec­tive for fail­ing to inves­ti­gate and present avail­able mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence in his case, includ­ing evi­dence relat­ed to​“a head injury he sus­tained as a child when an auto­mo­bile rolled over his head.” The court also found that the state courts had denied Jefferson a…

Read More

News 

May 052017

Death-Row Exoneree, Law Professor, Attorney Voice Opposition to Alabama’s Fair Justice Act”

Soon after pass­ing leg­is­la­tion to make death penal­ty tri­als fair­er by pre­vent­ing judges from over­rid­ing jury rec­om­men­da­tions of life sen­tences, the Alabama leg­is­la­ture is tak­ing steps to enact a bill that crit­ics say would make cap­i­tal appeals far less fair. The bill, denom­i­nat­ed the​“Fair Justice Act,” would con­strict the amount of time death-row pris­on­ers have to file appeals, impose dead­lines for judges to rule on appeals,…

Read More

News 

May 042017

Supreme Court Tells Alabama to Reconsider the Factors It Has Used to Determine Intellectual Disability

The U.S. Supreme Court has vacat­ed the Alabama state courts’ rejec­tion of a pris­on­er’s claim that he is inel­i­gi­ble for the death penal­ty because of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty, and direct­ed the state to recon­sid­er his claim in light of the Court’s recent deci­sion in Moore v. Texas requir­ing states to employ sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly accept­ed stan­dards in deter­min­ing whether a death-row pris­on­er is intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled. On May…

Read More

News 

May 022017

Review Commission Report: Oklahoma Death Penalty Cases Cost Triple That Of Non-Capital Cases

An inde­pen­dent study of the costs of seek­ing and impos­ing the death penal­ty in Oklahoma, pre­pared for the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission, has con­clud­ed that seek­ing the death penal­ty in Oklahoma​“incurs sig­nif­i­cant­ly more time, effort, and costs on aver­age, as com­pared to when the death penal­ty is not sought in first degree mur­der cas­es.” The report — pre­pared by Seattle University crim­i­nal jus­tice pro­fes­sors Peter A. Collins and Matthew J.

Read More

News 

May 012017

BOOKS: The Trials of Walter Ogrod” Chronicles Pennsylvania Possible Innocence Case

Walter Ogrod was con­vict­ed and sen­tenced to death in Philadelphia in 1996 for the 1988 mur­der of a 4‑year-old girl, whose body was found in a dis­card­ed tele­vi­sion box. Ogrod, who is devel­op­men­tal­ly dis­abled, has long main­tained his inno­cence, but despite sig­nif­i­cant irreg­u­lar­i­ties in the case and amidst alle­ga­tions of offi­cial mis­con­duct, local pros­e­cu­tors have fought efforts to obtain DNA test­ing of the phys­i­cal evi­dence and to inves­ti­gate the role…

Read More

News 

Apr 262017

Bipartisan Oklahoma Report Recommends Moratorium on Executions Pending Significant Reforms’

After spend­ing more than a year study­ing Oklahoma​’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment prac­tices, the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission has unan­i­mous­ly rec­om­mend­ed that the state extend its cur­rent mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions​“until sig­nif­i­cant reforms are accom­plished.” The bipar­ti­san com­mis­sion issued its report on April 25, 2017, reach­ing what it char­ac­ter­ized as​“dis­turb­ing” find­ings that​“led Commission mem­bers to question…

Read More