Entries by Death Penalty Information Center
News
Dec 21, 2004
Massachusetts’ “Foolproof Death Penalty” Idea Achieves Questionable Status
In its annual eclectic collection of ideas from the past year, The New York Times Magazine included the “Foolproof Death Penalty” propsed by Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. The Times attempts “to salute the absurdly wide range of human originality” and culls its entries not only from mainstream sources but also from the “tattoo culture and fast food management, horticulture and shoe design.” In response to Romney’s notion of “error-free capital punishment,” Berkeley law professor…
Read MoreNews
Dec 21, 2004
Poll Finds Waning Support for Death Penalty
According to a recent poll conducted by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, only 62% of respondents support capital punishment for persons convicted of murder, and Americans prefer the sentencing option of life without parole when given the choice. Overall support for capital punishment has fallen since Quinnipiac’s poll in June 2004, when support registered 65%. Similar shifts in public opinion found growing support for life-without-parole sentences. In the December poll when…
Read MoreNews
Dec 20, 2004
California Plans $220 Million Death Row While Inmates Wait 4 Years to Start Appeal
California already has the largest death row in the country and is now planning to build a new $220 million facility designed to house more than 1,400 death row inmates. State Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald M. George said that the large death row reflects the consequences of a careful appeals process that is designed to ensure due process for those facing execution. “The virtues of the system also represent its vices because it does end up causing a lot of delay,” stated the Chief…
Read MoreNews
Dec 17, 2004
Kansas Death Penalty Statute Ruled Unconstitutional
The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s 1994 death penalty law is unconstitutional because it contains a provision giving the state an advantage when jurors find the aggravating and mitigating factors presented at sentencing to be equal. In that circumstance, the current law states that the defendant must be sentenced to death. The Court ruled that such a provision does not allow the jury to express a reasoned moral response to the evidence, and the process does not comport…
Read MoreNews
Dec 16, 2004
NEW VOICES: Manhattan’s DA Says Death Penalty “Exacts a terrible price”
As New York lawmakers conducted the first in a series of hearings on the state’s death penalty, Robert M. Morgenthau, Manhattan’s long-serving District Attorney, recommended that New York abandon the practice: “It’s the deed that teaches, not the name we give it,” Morgenthau said, quoting George Bernard Shaw. He went on to note, “The penalty exacts a terrible price in dollars, lives, and human decency. Rather than tamping down the flames of violence, it fuels them.…I urge all of our…
Read MoreNews
Dec 15, 2004
NEW VOICES: Andrew Cuomo Calls for Reexamination of NY’s Death Penalty
Andrew Cuomo (pictured), who served as U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1997 to 2001, recently urged New York lawmakers to put an end to the death penalty. The state is holding hearings on capital punishment in the wake of a N.Y. Court of Appeals decision finding the statute unconstitutional earlier this year. In his op-ed in The New York Times, Cuomo noted: The Democrats, who control the Assembly, should make it clear that they will not pass a new death penalty law. This…
Read MoreNews
Dec 14, 2004
DPIC RELEASES 2004 REPORT SHOWING SHARP DECLINE IN DEATH PENALTY USE
Read the Press Release. Copies may be obtained by contacting DPIC. The report will be posted on our Web site in the near…
Read MoreNews
Dec 14, 2004
Supreme Court Clarifies the Application of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Standards
On December 13, 2004, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that the effectiveness of defense counsel’s performance must be judged by standards previously set out by the Court in Strickland v. Washington. In Florida v. Nixon, Joe Nixon’s attorney told the jury his client was guilty without his client’s express consent. After the jury sentenced Nixon to death, the Florida Supreme Court overturned Nixon’s conviction, holding that counsel’s concession of guilt automatically fell below an objective…
Read MoreNews
Dec 14, 2004
Supreme Court to Consider Impact of International Ruling in Death Penalty Cases
On December 10, 2004 (Human Rights Day), the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of Jose Medellin to determine what effect the United States should give to a recent ruling by the International Court of Justice at the Hague, the United Nations’ highest court. In the case of Medellin and 50 other Mexican nationals on death row, the World Court ruled that the U.S. failed to inform Mexico of their arrests, in violation of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. This…
Read MoreNews
Dec 10, 2004
NEW RESOURCE: Center on Wrongful Convictions Examines “The Snitch System”
The Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University School of Law has released a new report entitled, The Snitch System: How Snitch Testimony Sent Randy Steidl and Other Innocent Americans to Death Row. The report highlights 51 cases of Americans who were wrongfully convicted and given death sentences based on the testimony of witnesses with incentives to lie. According to the Center, snitch testimony is the primary cause for approximately 45% of all wrongful capital…
Read More