A bill to repeal the death penal­ty and use the funds saved to inves­ti­gate unsolved mur­der cas­es in Colorado was defeat­ed in the state sen­ate by a vote of 18 – 17 on May 6. The House had ear­li­er approved the bill by a vote of 33 – 32. On May 4, the sen­ate had approved an amend­ment, drop­ping the repeal of the death penal­ty and fund­ing the cost of inves­ti­gat­ing cold cas­es through a $2.50 fine to con­vict­ed felons. However, the con­fer­ence com­mit­tee restored the repeal pro­vi­sion and the sen­ate reject­ed the com­mit­tee’s pro­pos­al after an impas­sioned debate. The repeal bill’s co-spon­sor, Senator Morgan Carroll, expressed con­cerns about the risks of the death penal­ty, includ­ing exe­cut­ing the inno­cent. In a democ­ra­cy,” she said, the deci­sions of the state come with blood on all of our hands in the event that we are wrong.” In all, 50 leg­is­la­tors vot­ed for repeal, and 50 vot­ed against repeal. 

Concerns over the cost of the death penal­ty, which have risen with state bud­get short­falls, have been voiced in oth­er states as well. The Republican spon­sor of a death penal­ty repeal pro­pos­al in Kansas specif­i­cal­ly cit­ed the cost-ben­e­fit analy­sis in tough eco­nom­ic times as a rea­son for recon­sid­er­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Governor Bill Richardson also cit­ed cost as part of his rea­son for sign­ing New Mexico’s repeal measure.

(K. Johnson, Death Penalty Repeal Fails in Colorado,” N.Y. Times, May 5, 2009; Bid to repeal death penal­ty fails in Senate,” Denver Post, May 6, 2009). See Recent Legislation and Costs.

Citation Guide