An analy­sis of the death penal­ty in Utah shows how rarely it has been used in recent years. Prosecutors have sought it in only 7 cas­es in the last 5 years, and none has result­ed in a death sen­tence. Utah has had only 1 exe­cu­tion in the past 13 years. Experts have offered sev­er­al rea­sons for the declin­ing use: the alter­na­tive sen­tence of life with­out parole is now ava­ial­ble; the appeal of a death sen­tence is cost­ly and slow; and many vic­tims’ fam­i­lies wish to see a more time­ly end to the crim­i­nal case. Salt Lake County District Attorney Sam Gill said the death penal­ty should be used spar­ing­ly, and only with great con­sid­er­a­tion: What you want is a pros­e­cu­tor who strug­gles with the death penal­ty, because it’s a deci­sion to take some­body’s life. It should­n’t be some­thing we do arbi­trar­i­ly. It’s not some­thing that we should be cav­a­lier about. It is not some­thing we should reach to with indis­cre­tion.” Prosecutors also said they con­sid­er the wish­es of the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly when decid­ing whether to seek a death sen­tence. Mark Anderson, whose cousin was mur­dered, said he believed life with­out parole was an appro­pri­ate pun­ish­ment in that case. When you have a crime that’s com­mit­ted, you need to pro­tect two enti­ties. You need to pro­tect the vic­tim and the pub­lic in gen­er­al, and in both of those sit­u­a­tions jus­tice was sat­is­fied,” Anderson said.

The major­i­ty of those exe­cut­ed in Utah since 1976 (4 of 7 inmates) waived all or parts of their appeal.

(E. Morgan, Is the death penal­ty dead in Utah?,” Deseret News, September 30, 2013). See Sentencing and New Voices.

Citation Guide