40 active1 death warrants have been issued in the United States thus far in 2025 — more than a third of them were issued by one individual, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, in a process cloaked in secrecy. The only two states that place authority solely in the hands of the governor to issue an execution warrant are Florida, which has executed more individuals in 2025 than any other state, and Pennsylvania, which has not executed anyone in over 25 years and where a moratorium on executions is currently in place. In all other states, courts are deeply involved in the process of issuing an execution warrant, exercising an important check on the final stage in a capital punishment case.
DPI looked at all 27 states that currently permit the death penalty, including California, Pennsylvania and Oregon, which have paused executions, to understand better the process of execution warrants. Among the questions: Who is vested with responsibility for setting an execution warrant? What safeguards ensure that individuals with pending appeals are not executed? What notice is required, if any, between the issuance of the execution warrant and the execution itself?
An execution warrant is an official document conveying both the instruction to execute an individual and stating the authority to do so, usually issued by a court or an executive body (usually the governor of a state) to the prison warden. The warrant sometimes outlines relevant legal proceedings, the timing for the execution, and sometimes the manner of execution. The earliest documented execution warrants in the United States date back to the Salem witch trials in 1692.
At one time, most execution warrants were issued solely by governors — a practice that is now the exception, rather than the rule. In recent decades, legislatures generally expanded the role of the judiciary, requiring the courts to weigh in before an execution is set. Courts are best positioned both to understand the complexity of the capital appeal process, where multiple claims can be pending simultaneously in state and federal court, and to legally protect an individual from execution while appeals remain in consideration.
Most states also require a period of time, often defined by statute, between issuance of the warrant and the execution. This ensures that prisoners have some time to legally challenge the execution, including raising claims that are not ripe before an execution date is set, such as claims of incompetency. The designated period between the issuance of the execution warrant and the execution date can be as short as seven days (Kansas) and as long as a year (Indiana), but most time periods are between 30 and 90 days. Some are quite specific: South Carolina’s statute mandates that the execution take place “on the fourth Friday” after the warden receives notice from the court that “judgment below has been affirmed or the appeal dismissed or abandoned[.]” Ohio, South Dakota, Arkansas, Kentucky, California, North Carolina, and Mississippi do not define by statute the length of time between the issuance of a warrant and execution, but all still enshrine a role for the courts the process of determining the date.
Two states stand out in this analysis for their deviation from these norms: Florida and Louisiana.
In Florida, the governor enjoys sole plenary authority to issue execution warrants. Current Governor Ron DeSantis, who has overseen eleven executions thus far in 2025, has been criticized for setting executions and deciding clemency requests in complete secrecy. In addition, the 30 days allocated between the date of the warrant and execution can be insufficient, as was the case of Curtis Windom, executed on August 28, 2025. In filings prior to his execution, Mr. Windom’s counsel challenged the scheduling order in his case, arguing that they had less than five days between July 29 when the warrant was signed and August 3, the court-imposed deadline for filing any successive motions in the case. Former Florida Governor Bob Martinez signed 139 death warrants in four years, including for some who had not completed all their appeals.
In February 2025, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry ended the state’s 15-year pause on executions, and his call for a resumption of the death penalty prompted multiple district attorneys to request execution warrants for prisoners. In one case, Rapides Parish District Attorney Phillip Terrell sought and obtained an execution warrant for Larry Roy, only to have it declared “null and void” by District Judge Lowell Hazel after attorneys for Mr. Roy argued that he has not exhausted all of his legal avenues for relief. In two other cases, the Louisiana Supreme Court recalled death warrants for Darrell Draughn and Marcus Reed, agreeing with the two men that a judge must consider their state post-conviction claims before setting execution dates.
Oregon stands out for different reasons. The last execution in the state was in 1997 and in 2011 then-Governor John Kitzhaber declared a moratorium on executions. Section 137.463 of the state code outlines the most elaborate process for determining whether it is proper to issue an execution warrant of any state DPI reviewed. Among other novelties, the statute calls for the convening of a death warrant hearing in the trial court where the death sentence was handed down, in the presence of the individual sentenced and their attorney. The hearing is to ascertain whether the individual sentenced to death is competent to be executed, to appoint counsel for any post-conviction proceedings if the individual is eligible; and to determine if the individual intends to challenge their sentence or conviction.
The next execution scheduled in Florida is that of David Joseph Pittman on September 17, 2025.
-
14 additional death warrants scheduled for 2025 are considered “inactive,” which means upon information and belief, the defendant will likely not be executed on the scheduled execution date. This could be for a number of reasons, including the fact that the date was withdrawn or rescheduled , the individual died in prison before their execution date, or the execution was stayed.