On March 26, the Maryland House of Delegates approved a bill requir­ing spe­cif­ic evi­dence of guilt if the death penal­ty is sought. The same bill was passed ear­li­er by the Senate, and the gov­er­nor sup­ports the leg­is­la­tion. Calling it a step for­ward,” Gov. O’Malley indi­cat­ed he will sign the bill, lim­it­ing cap­i­tal cas­es to those with bio­log­i­cal or DNA evi­dence of guilt, a video­taped con­fes­sion, or a video­tape link­ing the defen­dant to a homi­cide. The restric­tions derived from an amend­ment dur­ing the Senate’s con­sid­er­a­tion of a bill to abol­ish the death penal­ty. The cur­rent bill is designed to lessen the pos­si­bil­i­ty of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent per­son. Maryland has exe­cut­ed five pris­on­ers since rein­stat­ing the death penal­ty in 1978 and has five oth­er inmates on death row.

(J. Wagner, Md. Lawmakers Approve Tighter Death Penalty Rules,” Washington Post, March 26, 2009). See Innocence and Recent Legislative Activity. In oth­er states, New Mexico recent­ly abol­ished the death penal­ty, while bills to repeal cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment are still being con­sid­ered after pass­ing in one house in Montana and New Hampshire. A bill to abol­ish the fed­er­al death penal­ty was intro­duced by Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin.

Citation Guide