During a recent pre­sen­ta­tion, University of Houston Law Professor David R. Dow shared lessons learned from the 20 years dur­ing which he defend­ed over 100 death row inmates. Professor Dow assert­ed that there are com­mon fac­tors in the lives of those who are cur­rent­ly fac­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Dow said, “[I]f you tell me the name of a death row inmate — does­n’t mat­ter what state he’s in, does­n’t mat­ter if I’ve ever met him before — I’ll write his biog­ra­phy for you. And eight out of 10 times, the details of that biog­ra­phy will be more or less accu­rate… Eighty per­cent of the peo­ple on death row are peo­ple who came from [some] sort of dys­func­tion­al fam­i­ly…. Eighty per­cent of the peo­ple on death row are peo­ple who had expo­sure to the juve­nile jus­tice sys­tem.” Professor Dow asserts that inter­ven­tion dur­ing ear­li­er stages of defen­dants’ lives may be one of the most effec­tive ways of pre­vent­ing them from com­mit­ting vio­lent crimes lat­er on: People might dis­agree about whether [a mur­der­er] should have been exe­cut­ed. But I think every­body would agree that the best pos­si­ble ver­sion … would be a sto­ry where no mur­der ever occurs.” Professor Dow con­cludes that ear­ly inter­ven­tion is also a more prac­ti­cal use of tax­pay­ers’ mon­ey. He said, “[F]or every $15,000 that we spend inter­ven­ing in the lives of eco­nom­i­cal­ly and oth­er­wise dis­ad­van­taged kids in those ear­li­er chap­ters, we save $80,000 in crime-relat­ed costs down the road. Even if you don’t agree that there’s a moral imper­a­tive that we do it, it just makes economic sense.”

(D. Dow, Lessons from Death Row Inmates,” Tedx Austin, January 2012; DPIC Posted, June 27, 2012). Read full tran­script of the pre­sen­ta­tion. Listen to our pod­cast on Death Row.

Citation Guide