A recent arti­cle in the Liberty Champion, a pub­li­ca­tion of Liberty University, dis­cussed the con­cerns some con­ser­v­a­tive Christians have about the death penal­ty. The arti­cle by stu­dent Whitney Rutherford focused on the finan­cial costs of the death penal­ty and its emo­tion­al toll on mur­der vic­tims’ fam­i­lies: Rather than pro­vid­ing vic­tims, their fam­i­lies, and the fam­i­ly of the accused an expe­di­ent result, these groups are dragged through the emo­tion­al upheaval of wait­ing and watch­ing the jus­tice sys­tem work.” The author also quot­ed James R. Acker, a dis­tin­guished pro­fes­sor at the School of Criminal Justice at the University of Albany, who ques­tioned the role of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in a recent Colorado case. Acker asked, Would the time and mon­ey devot­ed to achiev­ing this man’s death not be bet­ter spent on ser­vices and law enforce­ment ini­tia­tives meant to repair and pre­vent the mind­less dev­as­ta­tion of crim­i­nal homi­cide?” The arti­cle con­clud­ed, Christians may sup­port cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment with­out negat­ing their beliefs, but the mod­ern approach to cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment is an expen­sive and emo­tion­al­ly destruc­tive path. The death penal­ty has become a pit of mon­ey and lost years with­out pro­vid­ing the jus­tice that victims expect.”

(W. Rutherford, Death penal­ty a dif­fi­cult dilem­ma,” Liberty Champion, April 16, 2013). See Religion and New Voices.

Citation Guide