John Whitehead, pres­i­dent of the con­ser­v­a­tive Rutherford Institute, recent­ly voiced con­cerns in the Huffington Post about expand­ing the death penal­ty in Virginia. He not­ed, As cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment stud­ies have shown, whether or not you are sen­tenced to death often has lit­tle to do with the crime com­mit­ted and every­thing to do with your race, where you live, and who pros­e­cutes your case.” Whitehead cit­ed sev­er­al rea­sons for not expand­ing the death penal­ty, includ­ing the risk of exe­cut­ing the inno­cent, the open­ing to pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al over­reach, the lack of a deter­rent effect from the death penal­ty and its high costs. He cit­ed Death Penalty Information Center data that showed the mur­der rate in states with­out the death penal­ty was near­ly 40% low­er than in states with the death penal­ty. The expan­sion bill was defeat­ed in a Virginia Senate committee.

Rutherford con­clud­ed, It is time for our elect­ed rep­re­sen­ta­tives to ensure that their leg­isla­tive efforts reflect the pri­or­i­ties of their con­stituents. For most Virginians, that means keep­ing a roof over their heads, food on the table and ensur­ing that their tax­pay­er dol­lars are being used where they can do the most good. At a time when Virginia law­mak­ers are being forced to elim­i­nate thou­sands of jobs, slash agen­cies’ spend­ing and trim mil­lions from edu­ca­tion and Medicaid pro­grams for the indi­gent, elder­ly and dis­abled, the last thing our rep­re­sen­ta­tives need to be doing is adding to the tax bur­den by expand­ing the scope of the death penalty.”

(J. Whitehead, Virginians Should Say No to Expanding Death Penalty,” Huffington Post, February 16, 2010). See also Costs and Deterrence.

Citation Guide