Biases & Vulnerabilities

Race

Racial bias against defendants of color and in favor of white victims has a strong effect on who is capitally prosecuted, sentenced to death, and executed.

Racial Justice Reports

DPI's reports on the racial history of the death penalty in individual states

Overview

The death penal­ty has long come under scruti­ny for being racial­ly biased. Earlier in the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry when it was applied for the crime of rape, 89 per­cent of the exe­cu­tions involved black defen­dants, most for the rape of a white woman. In the mod­ern era, when exe­cu­tions have been car­ried out exclu­sive­ly for mur­der, 75 per­cent of the cas­es involve the mur­der of white vic­tims, even though about half of all homi­cide vic­tims in America are black.

A bias towards white-vic­tim cas­es has been found in almost all of the sophis­ti­cat­ed stud­ies explor­ing this area over many years. These stud­ies typ­i­cal­ly con­trol for oth­er vari­ables in the cas­es stud­ied, such as the num­ber of vic­tims or the bru­tal­i­ty of the crime, and still found that defen­dants were more like­ly to be sen­tenced to death if they killed a white person.

The issue of racial dis­par­i­ties in the use of the death penal­ty was con­sid­ered by the Supreme Court in 1987. In a close vote, the Court held that stud­ies alone could not pro­vide the required proof of racial dis­crim­i­na­tion in a par­tic­u­lar defendant’s case. This deci­sion appeared to close the door to broad chal­lenges to the death penal­ty. However, the Court has found racial dis­crim­i­na­tion in the selec­tion of the jury in indi­vid­ual cap­i­tal cas­es.
 

At Issue

Today there is grow­ing evi­dence that racial bias con­tin­ues in soci­ety, par­tic­u­lar­ly with­in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. The exis­tence of implic­it racial bias among some law enforce­ment offi­cers, wit­ness­es, jurors, and oth­ers allows harsh­er pun­ish­ment of minori­ties, even with­out legal sanc­tion or inten­tion. Although these prej­u­dices are hard to uproot, the unfair appli­ca­tion of the death penal­ty could be halt­ed by elim­i­nat­ing that sen­tenc­ing option altogether.

What DPIC Offers 

DPIC tracks the race of those on death row, those who have been exe­cut­ed, the vic­tims in the under­ly­ing crime, and many relat­ed sta­tis­tics. It col­lects the sophis­ti­cat­ed stud­ies on racial bias that have been pub­lished over many years. Many of DPIC’s reports focus on aspects of this ques­tion and some are devot­ed entire­ly to the issue of race.

News & Developments


News

Aug 27, 2025

Mid-Year Review 2025: New Death Sentences Remain Low Amidst Increase in Executions

This week we are fea­tur­ing some arti­cles from the first part of 2025 that we think are worth anoth­er look. We’ll be back with new arti­cles next week. This arti­cle orig­i­nal­ly ran on July 7, 2025. At the mid­point of 2025, the Death Penalty Information Center (DPI) offers this detailed analy­sis of the key facts and themes emerg­ing in the use of the death penal­ty across the U.S. For more than 30 years, DPI has been the pre­em­i­nent nation­al resource for time­ly and trustworthy…

Read More

News

Aug 26, 2025

DPI Report Examines the Legacy of Roper v. Simmons and Its Implications for 18- to 20-Year-Olds in Death Penalty Cases

This week we are fea­tur­ing some arti­cles from the first part of 2025 that we think are worth anoth­er look. We’ll be back with new arti­cles next week. This arti­cle was orig­i­nal­ly post­ed on April 30, 2025. In com­mem­o­ra­tion of the 20th anniver­sary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s land­mark deci­sion end­ing the juve­nile death penal­ty, the Death Penalty Information Center (DPI) today released a new report: Immature Minds in a​“Maturing Society”: Roper v. Simmons at 20, detailing…

Read More

News

Aug 25, 2025

State Spotlight: California Death Row Shrinks Sharply in 2024, Driven by the Resentencing of At Least 45 People to Life Sentences or Less

This week we are fea­tur­ing some arti­cles from the first part of 2025 that we think are worth anoth­er look. We’ll be back with new arti­cles next week. This arti­cle orig­i­nal­ly ran on February 11, 2025. When California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions in 2019, he said that the state’s​“death penal­ty sys­tem has been, by all mea­sures, a fail­ure.” He explained that the death penal­ty​“has dis­crim­i­nat­ed against defen­dants who are mentally ill,…

Read More

News

Aug 20, 2025

Former Alabama Governor Urges Use of Clemency, Criticizes Florida’s Execution Process as Shrouded in Secrecy”

In an August 14, 2025, op-ed in the South Florida Sun Sentinel, for­mer Alabama Governor Don Siegelman revealed he has​“lived to regret” not com­mut­ing death sen­tences while he was in office, and crit­i­cized Florida’s exe­cu­tion selec­tion process, cit­ing seri­ous con­cerns with secre­cy and racial bias. Writing about two sched­uled exe­cu­tions in Florida — Kayle Bates on August 19 and Curtis Windom on August 28 — Gov. Siegelman argues the cas­es sur­face sys­temic problems in…

Read More

News

Jul 08, 2025

ACLU Report Shows How Death Penalty Jury Selection Discriminates Against Black Americans, Women, and People of Faith

A new report from the ACLU doc­u­ments how the process of select­ing juries for death penal­ty cas­es sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly excludes Black prospec­tive jurors, women, and peo­ple of faith, fun­da­men­tal­ly under­min­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al promise of a tri­al by a jury of one’s peers. The report, Fatal Flaws: Revealing the Racial and Religious Gerrymandering of the Capital Jury, exam­ines the prac­tice of​“death qual­i­fi­ca­tion,” a require­ment that poten­tial jurors must be…

Read More