Voters in three states approved pro-death penal­ty bal­lot ques­tions Tuesday, while in a fourth, vot­ers turned back an effort to oust four Justices who had been crit­i­cized for grant­i­ng defen­dants relief in cap­i­tal cas­es. Amid wide­spread agree­ment that Californias death penal­ty sys­tem is bro­ken, the state’s vot­ers reject­ed Proposition 62, which would have abol­ished the state’s death penal­ty and replaced it with life with­out pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole plus resti­tu­tion, and nar­row­ly approved a com­pet­ing bal­lot ini­tia­tive, Proposition 66, which seeks to lim­it state court death penal­ty appeals and expe­dite exe­cu­tions. With 99% of precincts report­ing, Prop 62 trailed 54%-46%, with 3,964,862 Yes votes and 4,643,413 No votes. Prop 66 pre­vailed 51%-49%, with 4,203,801 Yes votes and 4,051,749 No votes. Earlier in the day, Nebraska vot­ers, in a close­ly watched ref­er­en­dum, over­turned the state leg­is­la­ture’s repeal of the state’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment statute and rein­stat­ed the death penal­ty. With 99% per­cent of precincts report­ing, Nebraskans vot­ed in favor of the death penal­ty by a mar­gin of 61%-39%, cast­ing 443,506 repeal” votes on Referendum 426 to over­turn the leg­is­la­ture’s abo­li­tion of the death penal­ty, against 280,587 retain” votes to keep the leg­isla­tive repeal in place. Wednesday morn­ing, Governor Pete Ricketts pledged to take action to car­ry out exe­cu­tions in Nebraska, while long-time death penal­ty oppo­nent, State Senator Ernie Chambers, vowed to intro­duce a new bill in the next leg­isla­tive ses­sion to abol­ish cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. In Oklahoma, vot­ers by a near­ly 2 – 1 mar­gin approved State Question 776, which con­sti­tu­tion­al­izes the state leg­is­la­ture’s pow­er to adopt any exe­cu­tion method not pro­hib­it­ed by the U.S. Constitution and pre­vents Oklahoma’s state courts from declar­ing the death penal­ty cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment. With 100% of precincts report­ing, Question 776 pre­vailed 66%-34%, with 941,336 Yes votes and 477,057 No votes. The death penal­ty was also a cen­tral focus in judi­cial reten­tion elec­tions in Kansas, where pro-death penal­ty groups tar­get­ed four jus­tices of the state supreme court and spent more than $1 mil­lion in an attempt to oust them for their votes over­turn­ing sev­er­al Kansas death sen­tences. Voters retained all four Justices. Chief Justice Lawton Nuss, speak­ing on behalf of the chal­lenged jus­tices, said The supreme court’s abil­i­ty to make deci­sions based on the rule of law — and the people’s con­sti­tu­tion — has been pre­served.” Ryan Wright of Kansans for Fair Courts, which opposed the efforts to remove the Justices, added Kansans have sent a very clear mes­sage … : hands off our court.” 

(J. Ollua, California vot­ers reject mea­sure to repeal death penal­ty, approve plan to expe­dite it,” Los Angeles Times, November 9, 2016; P. Hammel, Nebraskans vote over­whelm­ing­ly to restore death penal­ty, nul­li­fy his­toric 2015 vote by state Legislature,” Omaha World-Herald, November 9, 2016; J. Duggan, With death penal­ty rein­stat­ed in Nebraska, Ricketts to focus on car­ry­ing it out,” Omaha World-Herald, November 9, 2016; State Question 776: Oklahoma vot­ers reaf­firmed their sup­port of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment,” Tulsa World, November 8, 2016; S. Zeff, All Kansas Supreme Court Justices Retained,” KCUR, November 9, 2016.) See Recent Legislative Activity.

Citation Guide