Time Magazine

May 102004

What Makes Teens Tick; A flood of hormones, sure. But also a host of structural changes in the brain. Can those explain the behaviors that make adolescence so exciting – and so exasperating?

By Claudia Wallis; Kristina Dell, with report­ing by Alice Park/​New York

Five young men in sneak­ers and jeans troop into a wait­ing room at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, Md., and drape them­selves all over the chairs in clas­sic col­lapsed-teenag­er mode, trail­ing back­packs, a CD play­er and a lap­top loaded with com­put­er games. It’s midafter­noon, and they are, of course, tired, but even so their pres­ence adds a jan­g­ly, hor­mon­al buzz to the bland, insti­tu­tion­al set­ting. Fair-haired twins Corey and Skyler Mann, 16, and their burli­er big broth­ers Anthony and Brandon, 18, who are also twins, plus eldest broth­er Christopher, 22, are here to have their heads exam­ined. Literally. The five broth­ers from Orem, Utah, are the lat­est recruits to a giant study that’s been going on in this build­ing since 1991. Its goal: to deter­mine how the brain devel­ops from child­hood into ado­les­cence and on into early adulthood.

It is the project of Dr. Jay Giedd (pro­nounced Geed), chief of brain imag­ing in the child psy­chi­a­try branch at the National Institute of Mental Health. Giedd, 43, has devot­ed the past 13 years to peer­ing inside the heads of 1,800 kids and teenagers using high-pow­ered mag­net­ic res­o­nance imag­ing (MRI). For each vol­un­teer, he cre­ates a unique pho­to album, tak­ing MRI snap­shots every two years and build­ing a record as the brain morphs and grows. Giedd start­ed out inves­ti­gat­ing the devel­op­men­tal ori­gins of atten­tion-deficit/hy­per­ac­tiv­i­ty dis­or­der (ADHD) and autism (“I was going alpha­bet­i­cal­ly,” he jokes) but soon dis­cov­ered that so lit­tle was known about how the brain is sup­posed to devel­op that it was impos­si­ble to fig­ure out where things might be going wrong. In a way, the vast project that has become his life’s work is noth­ing more than an attempt to estab­lish a gigan­tic con­trol group. It turned out that nor­mal brains were so inter­est­ing in them­selves,” he mar­vels. And the ado­les­cent stud­ies have been the most sur­pris­ing of all.”

Before the imag­ing stud­ies by Giedd and his col­lab­o­ra­tors at UCLA, Harvard, the Montreal Neurological Institute and a dozen oth­er insti­tu­tions, most sci­en­tists believed the brain was large­ly a fin­ished prod­uct by the time a child reached the age of 12. Not only is it full-grown in size, Giedd explains, but in a lot of psy­cho­log­i­cal lit­er­a­ture, traced back to [Swiss psy­chol­o­gist Jean] Piaget, the high­est rung in the lad­der of cog­ni­tive devel­op­ment was about age 12 – for­mal oper­a­tions.” In the past, chil­dren entered ini­ti­a­tion rites and start­ed learn­ing trades at about the onset of puber­ty. Some the­o­rists con­clud­ed from this that the idea of ado­les­cence was an arti­fi­cial con­struct, a phe­nom­e­non invent­ed in the post – Industrial Revolution years. Giedd’s scan­ning stud­ies proved what every par­ent of a teenag­er knows: not only is the brain of the ado­les­cent far from mature, but both gray and white mat­ter under­go exten­sive struc­tur­al changes well past puber­ty. When we start­ed,” says Giedd, we thought we’d fol­low kids until about 18 or 20. If we had to pick a num­ber now, we’d prob­a­bly go to age 25.”

Now that MRI stud­ies have cracked open a win­dow on the devel­op­ing brain, researchers are look­ing at how the new­ly detect­ed phys­i­o­log­i­cal changes might account for the ado­les­cent behav­iors so famil­iar to par­ents: emo­tion­al out­bursts, reck­less risk tak­ing and rule break­ing, and the impas­sioned pur­suit of sex, drugs and rock n’ roll. Some experts believe the struc­tur­al changes seen at ado­les­cence may explain the tim­ing of such major men­tal ill­ness­es as schiz­o­phre­nia and bipo­lar dis­or­der. These dis­eases typ­i­cal­ly begin in ado­les­cence and con­tribute to the high rate of teen sui­cide. Increasingly, the wild con­duct once blamed on rag­ing hor­mones” is being seen as the by-prod­uct of two fac­tors: a sur­feit of hor­mones, yes, but also a pauci­ty of the cog­ni­tive con­trols need­ed for mature behavior.

In recent years, Giedd has shift­ed his focus to twins, which is why the Manns are such excit­ing recruits. Although most brain devel­op­ment seems to fol­low a set plan, with changes fol­low­ing cues that are pre­pro­grammed into genes, oth­er, sub­tler changes in gray mat­ter reflect expe­ri­ence and envi­ron­ment. By fol­low­ing twins, who start out with iden­ti­cal – or, in fra­ter­nal twins, sim­i­lar – pro­gram­ming but then diverge as life takes them on dif­fer­ent paths, he hopes to tease apart the influ­ences of nature and nur­ture. Ultimately, he hopes to find, for instance, that Anthony Mann’s plan to become a pilot and Brandon’s to study law will lead to brain dif­fer­ences that are detectable on future MRIs. The brain, more than any oth­er organ, is where expe­ri­ence becomes flesh.

Throughout the after­noon, the Mann broth­ers take turns com­plet­ing tests of intel­li­gence and cog­ni­tive func­tion. Between ses­sions they occa­sion­al­ly nee­dle one anoth­er in the wait­ing room. If the oth­er per­son is in a bad mood, you’ve got to pro­voke it,” Anthony asserts sly­ly. Their moth­er Nancy Mann, a sun­ny paragon of patience who has three daugh­ters in addi­tion to the five boys, smiles and rolls her eyes.

Shortly before 5 p.m., the Manns head down­stairs to the imag­ing floor to meet the mag­net. Giedd, a trim, ener­getic man with a red­dish beard, twinkly blue eyes and an imp­ish sense of humor, greets Anthony and tells him what to expect. He asks Anthony to remove his watch, his neck­lace and a high school ring, labeled KEEPER. Does Anthony have any met­al in his body? Any pierc­ings? Not this clean-cut, soc­cer-play­ing Mormon. Giedd tapes a vit­a­min E cap­sule onto Anthony’s left cheek and one in each ear. He explains that the oil-filled cap­sules are opaque to the scan­ner and will define a plane on the images, as well as help researchers tell left from right. The scan­ning will take about 15 min­utes, dur­ing which Anthony must lie com­plete­ly still. Dressed in a red sweat shirt, jeans and white K‑Swiss sneak­ers, he stretch­es out on the exam­in­ing table and slides his head into the machine’s giant magnetic ring.

MRI, Giedd points out, made study­ing healthy kids pos­si­ble” because there’s no radi­a­tion involved. (Before MRI, brain devel­op­ment was stud­ied most­ly by using cadav­ers.) Each of the Mann boys will be scanned three times. The first scan is a quick sur­vey that lasts one minute. The sec­ond lasts two min­utes and looks for any dam­age or abnor­mal­i­ty. The third is 10 min­utes long and tak­en at max­i­mum res­o­lu­tion. It’s the mon­ey shot. Giedd watch­es as Anthony’s brain appears in cross sec­tion on a com­put­er screen. The machine scans 124 slices, each as thin as a dime. It will take 20 hours of com­put­er time to process the images, but the analy­sis is done by humans, says Giedd. The human brain is still the best at pat­tern recog­ni­tion,” he marvels.

Some peo­ple get ner­vous as the MRI machine clangs nois­i­ly. Claustrophobes pan­ic. Anthony, lying still in the soul of the machine, sim­ply falls asleep.

CONSTRUCTION AHEAD

One rea­son sci­en­tists have been sur­prised by the fer­ment in the teenage brain is that the brain grows very lit­tle over the course of child­hood. By the time a child is 6, it is 90% to 95% of its adult size. As a mat­ter of fact, we are born equipped with most of the neu­rons our brain will ever have – and that’s few­er than we have in utero. Humans achieve their max­i­mum brain-cell den­si­ty between the third and sixth month of ges­ta­tion – the cul­mi­na­tion of an explo­sive peri­od of pre­na­tal neur­al growth. During the final months before birth, our brains under­go a dra­mat­ic prun­ing in which unnec­es­sary brain cells are elim­i­nat­ed. Many neu­ro­sci­en­tists now believe that autism is the result of insuf­fi­cient or abnor­mal prenatal pruning.

What Giedd’s long-term stud­ies have doc­u­ment­ed is that there is a sec­ond wave of pro­lif­er­a­tion and prun­ing that occurs lat­er in child­hood and that the final, crit­i­cal part of this sec­ond wave, affect­ing some of our high­est men­tal func­tions, occurs in the late teens. Unlike the pre­na­tal changes, this neur­al wax­ing and wan­ing alters not the num­ber of nerve cells but the num­ber of con­nec­tions, or synaps­es, between them. When a child is between the ages of 6 and 12, the neu­rons grow bushi­er, each mak­ing dozens of con­nec­tions to oth­er neu­rons and cre­at­ing new path­ways for nerve sig­nals. The thick­en­ing of all this gray mat­ter – the neu­rons and their branch­like den­drites – peaks when girls are about 11 and boys 12 1/​2, at which point a seri­ous round of prun­ing is under way. Gray mat­ter is thinned out at a rate of about 0.7% a year, taper­ing off in the ear­ly 20s. At the same time, the brain’s white mat­ter thick­ens. The white mat­ter is com­posed of fat­ty myelin sheaths that encase axons and, like insu­la­tion on a wire, make nerve-sig­nal trans­mis­sions faster and more effi­cient. With each pass­ing year (maybe even up to age 40) myelin sheaths thick­en, much like tree rings. During ado­les­cence, says Giedd, sum­ming up the process, you get few­er but faster con­nec­tions in the brain.” The brain becomes a more effi­cient machine, but there is a trade-off: it is prob­a­bly los­ing some of its raw poten­tial for learn­ing and its abil­i­ty to recov­er from trauma.

Most sci­en­tists believe that the prun­ing is guid­ed both by genet­ics and by a use-it-or-lose-it prin­ci­ple. Nobel prizewin­ning neu­ro­sci­en­tist Gerald Edelman has described that process as neur­al Darwinism” – sur­vival of the fittest (or most used) synaps­es. How you spend your time may be crit­i­cal. Research shows, for instance, that prac­tic­ing piano quick­ly thick­ens neu­rons in the brain regions that con­trol the fin­gers. Studies of London cab dri­vers, who must mem­o­rize all the city’s streets, show that they have an unusu­al­ly large hip­pocam­pus, a struc­ture involved in mem­o­ry. Giedd’s research sug­gests that the cere­bel­lum, an area that coor­di­nates both phys­i­cal and men­tal activ­i­ties, is par­tic­u­lar­ly respon­sive to expe­ri­ence, but he warns that it’s too soon to know just what dri­ves the buildup and prun­ing phas­es. He’s hop­ing his stud­ies of twins will help answer such ques­tions: We’re look­ing at what they eat, how they spend their time – is it video games or sports? Now the fun begins,” he says.

No mat­ter how a par­tic­u­lar brain turns out, its devel­op­ment pro­ceeds in stages, gen­er­al­ly from back to front. Some of the brain regions that reach matu­ri­ty ear­li­est – through pro­lif­er­a­tion and prun­ing – are those in the back of the brain that medi­ate direct con­tact with the envi­ron­ment by con­trol­ling such sen­so­ry func­tions as vision, hear­ing, touch and spa­tial pro­cess­ing. Next are areas that coor­di­nate those func­tions: the part of the brain that helps you know where the light switch is in your bath­room even if you can’t see it in the mid­dle of the night. The very last part of the brain to be pruned and shaped to its adult dimen­sions is the pre­frontal cor­tex, home of the so-called exec­u­tive func­tions – plan­ning, set­ting pri­or­i­ties, orga­niz­ing thoughts, sup­press­ing impuls­es, weigh­ing the con­se­quences of one’s actions. In oth­er words, the final part of the brain to grow up is the part capa­ble of decid­ing, I’ll fin­ish my home­work and take out the garbage, and then I’ll IM my friends about see­ing a movie.

Scientists and the gen­er­al pub­lic had attrib­uted the bad deci­sions teens make to hor­mon­al changes,” says Elizabeth Sowell, a UCLA neu­ro­sci­en­tist who has done sem­i­nal MRI work on the devel­op­ing brain. But once we start­ed map­ping where and when the brain changes were hap­pen­ing, we could say, Aha, the part of the brain that makes teenagers more respon­si­ble is not fin­ished maturing yet.”

RAGING HORMONES

Hormones, how­ev­er, remain an impor­tant part of the teen-brain sto­ry. Right about the time the brain switch­es from pro­lif­er­at­ing to prun­ing, the body comes under the hor­mon­al assault of puber­ty. (Research sug­gests that the two events are not close­ly linked because brain devel­op­ment pro­ceeds on sched­ule even when a child expe­ri­ences ear­ly or late puber­ty.) For years, psy­chol­o­gists attrib­uted the intense, com­bustible emo­tions and unpre­dictable behav­ior of teens to this bio­chem­i­cal onslaught. And new research adds fresh sup­port. At puber­ty, the ovaries and testes begin to pour estro­gen and testos­terone into the blood­stream, spurring the devel­op­ment of the repro­duc­tive sys­tem, caus­ing hair to sprout in the armpits and groin, wreak­ing hav­oc with the skin, and shap­ing the body to its adult con­tours. At the same time, testos­terone-like hor­mones released by the adren­al glands, locat­ed near the kid­neys, begin to cir­cu­late. Recent dis­cov­er­ies show that these adren­al sex hor­mones are extreme­ly active in the brain, attach­ing to recep­tors every­where and exert­ing a direct influ­ence on sero­tonin and oth­er neu­ro­chem­i­cals that reg­u­late mood and excitability.

The sex hor­mones are espe­cial­ly active in the brain’s emo­tion­al cen­ter – the lim­bic sys­tem. This cre­ates a tin­der­box of emo­tions,” says Dr. Ronald Dahl, a psy­chi­a­trist at the University of Pittsburgh. Not only do feel­ings reach a flash point more eas­i­ly, but ado­les­cents tend to seek out sit­u­a­tions where they can allow their emo­tions and pas­sions to run wild. Adolescents are active­ly look­ing for expe­ri­ences to cre­ate intense feel­ings,” says Dahl. It’s a very impor­tant hint that there is some par­tic­u­lar hor­mone-brain rela­tion­ship con­tribut­ing to the appetite for thrills, strong sen­sa­tions and excite­ment.” This thrill seek­ing may have evolved to pro­mote explo­ration, an eager­ness to leave the nest and seek one’s own path and part­ner. But in a world where fast cars, illic­it drugs, gangs and dan­ger­ous liaisons beck­on, it also puts the teenag­er at risk.

That is espe­cial­ly so because the brain regions that put the brakes on risky, impul­sive behav­ior are still under con­struc­tion. The parts of the brain respon­si­ble for things like sen­sa­tion seek­ing are get­ting turned on in big ways around the time of puber­ty,” says Temple University psy­chol­o­gist Laurence Steinberg. But the parts for exer­cis­ing judg­ment are still matur­ing through­out the course of ado­les­cence. So you’ve got this time gap between when things impel kids toward tak­ing risks ear­ly in ado­les­cence, and when things that allow peo­ple to think before they act come online. It’s like turn­ing on the engine of a car with­out a skilled dri­ver at the wheel.”

DUMB DECISIONS

Increasingly, psy­chol­o­gists like Steinberg are try­ing to con­nect the famil­iar pat­terns of ado­les­cents’ wacky behav­ior to the new find­ings about their evolv­ing brain struc­ture. It’s not always easy to do. In all like­li­hood, the behav­ior is chang­ing because the brain is chang­ing,” he says. But that is still a bit of a leap.” A crit­i­cal tool in mak­ing that leap is func­tion­al mag­net­ic res­o­nance imag­ing (fMRI). While ordi­nary MRI reveals brain struc­ture, fMRI actu­al­ly shows brain activ­i­ty while sub­jects are doing assigned tasks.

At McLean Hospital in Belmont, Mass., Harvard neu­ropsy­chol­o­gist Deborah Yurgelun-Todd did an ele­gant series of FMRI exper­i­ments in which both kids and adults were asked to iden­ti­ty the emo­tions dis­played in pho­tographs of faces. In doing these tasks,” she says, kids and young ado­les­cents rely heav­i­ly on the amyg­dala, a struc­ture in the tem­po­ral lobes asso­ci­at­ed with emo­tion­al and gut reac­tions. Adults rely less on the amyg­dala and more on the frontal lobe, a region asso­ci­at­ed with plan­ning and judg­ment.” While adults make few errors in assess­ing the pho­tos, kids under 14 tend to make mis­takes. In par­tic­u­lar, they iden­ti­fy fear­ful expres­sions as angry, con­fused or sad. By fol­low­ing the same kids year after year, Yurgelun-Todd has been able to watch their brain-activ­i­ty pat­tern – and their judg­ment – mature. Fledgling phys­i­ol­o­gy, she believes, may explain why ado­les­cents so fre­quent­ly mis­read emo­tion­al sig­nals, see­ing anger and hos­til­i­ty where none exists. Teenage rant­i­ng (“That teacher hates me!”) can be bet­ter under­stood in this light.

At Temple University, Steinberg has been study­ing anoth­er kind of judg­ment: risk assess­ment. In an exper­i­ment using a dri­ving-sim­u­la­tion game, he stud­ies teens and adults as they decide whether to run a yel­low light. Both sets of sub­jects, he found, make safe choic­es when play­ing alone. But in group play, teenagers start to take more risks in the pres­ence of their friends, while those over age 20 don’t show much change in their behav­ior. With this manip­u­la­tion,” says Steinberg, we’ve shown that age dif­fer­ences in deci­sion mak­ing and judg­ment may appear under con­di­tions that are emo­tion­al­ly arous­ing or have high social impact.” Most teen crimes, he says, are com­mit­ted by kids in packs.

Other researchers are explor­ing how the ado­les­cent propen­si­ty for unin­hib­it­ed risk tak­ing pro­pels teens to exper­i­ment with drugs and alco­hol. Traditionally, psy­chol­o­gists have attrib­uted this exper­i­men­ta­tion to peer pres­sure, teenagers’ attrac­tion to nov­el­ty and their roar­ing inter­est in loos­en­ing sex­u­al inhi­bi­tions. But researchers have raised the pos­si­bil­i­ty that rapid changes in dopamine-rich areas of the brain may be an addi­tion­al fac­tor in mak­ing teens vul­ner­a­ble to the stim­u­lat­ing and addic­tive effects of drugs and alco­hol. Dopamine, the brain chem­i­cal involved in moti­va­tion and in rein­forc­ing behav­ior, is par­tic­u­lar­ly abun­dant and active in the teen years.

Why is it so hard to get a teenag­er off the couch and work­ing on that all impor­tant col­lege essay? You might blame it on their imma­ture nucle­us accum­bens, a region in the frontal cor­tex that directs moti­va­tion to seek rewards. James Bjork at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism has been using fMRI to study moti­va­tion in a chal­leng­ing gam­bling game. He found that teenagers have less activ­i­ty in this region than adults do. If ado­les­cents have a moti­va­tion­al deficit, it may mean that they are prone to engag­ing in behav­iors that have either a real­ly high excite­ment fac­tor or a real­ly low effort fac­tor, or a com­bi­na­tion of both.” Sound famil­iar? Bjork believes his work may hold valu­able lessons for par­ents and soci­ety. When pre­sent­ing sug­ges­tions, any­thing par­ents can do to empha­size more imme­di­ate pay­offs will be more effec­tive,” he says. To per­suade a teen to quit drink­ing, for exam­ple, he sug­gests stress­ing some­thing imme­di­ate and tan­gi­ble – the dan­ger of get­ting kicked off the foot­ball team, say – rather than a future on skid row.

Persuading a teenag­er to go to bed and get up on a rea­son­able sched­ule is anoth­er mat­ter entire­ly. This kind of deci­sion mak­ing has less to do with the frontal lobe than with the pineal gland at the base of the brain. As night­time approach­es and day­light recedes, the pineal gland pro­duces mela­tonin, a chem­i­cal that sig­nals the body to begin shut­ting down for sleep. Studies by Mary Carskadon at Brown University have shown that it takes longer for mela­tonin lev­els to rise in teenagers than in younger kids or in adults, regard­less of expo­sure to light or stim­u­lat­ing activ­i­ties. The brain’s pro­gram for start­ing night­time is lat­er,” she explains.

PRUNING PROBLEMS

The new dis­cov­er­ies about teenage brain devel­op­ment have prompt­ed all sorts of ques­tions and the­o­ries about the tim­ing of child­hood men­tal ill­ness and cog­ni­tive dis­or­ders. Some sci­en­tists now believe that ADHD and Tourette’s syn­drome, which typ­i­cal­ly appear by the time a child reach­es age 7, may be relat­ed to the brain pro­lif­er­a­tion peri­od. Though both dis­or­ders have genet­ic roots, the rapid growth of brain tis­sue in ear­ly child­hood, espe­cial­ly in regions rich in dopamine, may set the stage for the increase in motor activ­i­ties and tics,” says Dr. Martin Teicher, direc­tor of devel­op­men­tal biopsy­chi­a­try research at McLean Hospital. When it starts to prune in ado­les­cence, you often see symptoms recede.”

Schizophrenia, on the oth­er hand, makes its appear­ance at about the time the pre­frontal cor­tex is get­ting pruned. Many peo­ple have spec­u­lat­ed that schiz­o­phre­nia may be due to an abnor­mal­i­ty in the prun­ing process,” says Teicher. Another hypoth­e­sis is that schiz­o­phre­nia has a much ear­li­er, pre­na­tal ori­gin, but as the brain prunes, it gets unmasked.” MRI stud­ies have shown that while the aver­age teenag­er los­es about 15% of his cor­ti­cal gray mat­ter, those who devel­op schiz­o­phre­nia lose as much as 25%.

WHAT’S A PARENT TO DO?

Brain sci­en­tists tend to be reluc­tant to make the leap from the lab­o­ra­to­ry to real-life, hard-core teenagers. Some feel a lit­tle burned by the way ear­li­er neu­ro­log­i­cal dis­cov­er­ies result­ed in Baby Einstein tapes and oth­er mar­ket­ing schemes that mis­ap­plied their sci­ence. It is clear, how­ev­er, that there are impli­ca­tions in the new research for par­ents, edu­ca­tors and lawmakers.

In light of what has been learned, it seems almost arbi­trary that our soci­ety has decid­ed that a young American is ready to dri­ve a car at 16, to vote and serve in the Army at 18 and to drink alco­hol at 21. Giedd says the best esti­mate for when the brain is tru­ly mature is 25, the age at which you can rent a car. Avis must have some pret­ty sophis­ti­cat­ed neu­ro­sci­en­tists,” he jokes. Now that we have sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence that the ado­les­cent brain is not quite up to scratch, some legal schol­ars and child advo­cates argue that minors should nev­er be tried as adults and should be spared the death penal­ty. Last year, in an offi­cial state­ment that sum­ma­rized cur­rent research on the ado­les­cent brain, the American Bar Association urged all state leg­is­la­tures to ban the death penal­ty for juve­niles. For social and bio­log­i­cal rea­sons,” it read, teens have increased dif­fi­cul­ty mak­ing mature deci­sions and under­stand­ing the con­se­quences of their actions.”

Most par­ents, of course, know this instinc­tive­ly. Still, it’s use­ful to learn that teenage behav­ior is not just a mat­ter of will­ful pig­head­ed­ness or deter­mi­na­tion to dri­ve you crazy – though these, too, can be fac­tors. There’s a debate over how much con­scious con­trol kids have,” says Giedd, who has four teenagers in train­ing” of his own. You can tell them to shape up or ship out, but mak­ing mis­takes is part of how the brain opti­mal­ly grows.” It might be more use­ful to help them make up for what their brain still lacks by pro­vid­ing struc­ture, orga­niz­ing their time, guid­ing them through tough deci­sions (even when they resist) and apply­ing those time-test­ed parental virtues: patience and love.

–With report­ing by Alice Park/​New York

INSIDE THE ADOLESCENT BRAIN

The brain under­goes two major devel­op­men­tal spurts, one in the womb and the sec­ond from child­hood through the teen years, when the organ matures by fits and starts in a sequence that moves from the back of the brain to the front

BRAIN AREA
DESCRIPTION /​DUTIES
CORPUS CALLOSUM

Thought to be involved in prob­lem solv­ing and cre­ativ­i­ty, this bun­dle of nerve fibers con­nects the left and right hemi­spheres of the brain. During ado­les­cence, the nerve fibers thick­en and process infor­ma­tion more and more efficiently
PREFRONTAL CORTEX


The CEO of the brain, also called the area of sober sec­ond thought, is the last part of the brain to mature-which may be why teens get into so much trou­ble. Located just behind the fore­head, the pre­frontal cor­tex grows dur­ing the pre­teen years and then shrinks as neur­al con­nec­tions are pruned during adolescence
BASAL GANGLIA

Larger in females than in males, this part of the brain acts like a sec­re­tary to the pre­frontal cor­tex by help­ing it pri­or­i­tize infor­ma­tion. The basal gan­glia and pre­frontal cor­tex are tight­ly con­nect­ed: at near­ly the same time, they grow neu­ron con­nec­tions and then prune them. This area of the brain is also active in small and large motor move­ments, so it may be impor­tant to expose pre­teens to music and sports while it is growing
AMYGDALA


This is the emo­tion­al cen­ter of the brain, home to such pri­mal feel­ings as fear and rage. In pro­cess­ing emo­tion­al infor­ma­tion, teens tend to rely more heav­i­ly on the amyg­dala. Adults depend more on the ratio­nal pre­frontal cor­tex, a part of the brain that is under­de­vel­oped in teens. That may explain why ado­les­cents often react more impul­sive­ly than adults
CEREBELLUM

Long thought to play a role in phys­i­cal coor­di­na­tion, this area may also reg­u­late cer­tain thought process­es. More sen­si­tive to envi­ron­ment than to hered­i­ty, the cere­bel­lum sup­ports activ­i­ties of high­er learn­ing like math­e­mat­ics, music and advanced social skills. New research shows that it changes dra­mat­i­cal­ly dur­ing ado­les­cence, increas­ing the num­ber of neu­rons and the com­plex­i­ty of their con­nec­tions. The cere­bel­lum is the only part of the brain that con­tin­ues grow­ing well into the early 20s
NERVE PROLIFERATION
By age 11 for girls and 12 1/​2 for boys, the neu­rons in the front of the brain have formed thou­sands of new con­nec­tions. Over the next few years, most of these links will be pruned
AND PRUNING Those that are used and rein­forced-the path­ways involved in lan­guage, for exam­ple-will be strength­ened, while the ones that aren’t used will die out


Sources: Dr. Jay Giedd, chief of brain imag­ing, child psy­chi­a­try branch, NIMH; Paul Thompson, Andrew Lee, Kiralee Hayashi and Arthur Toga, UCLA Lab of Neuro Imaging; Nitin Gogtay and Judy Rapoport, child psy­chi­a­try branch, NIMH

Text by Kristina Dell