Publications & Testimony

This list tracks known Florida death-sen­­tenced pris­on­ers eli­gi­ble for relief under Hurst v. Florida (2016) because 1) their jury rec­om­men­da­tions for death were not unan­i­mous, and 2) their con­vic­tions became final after Ring v. Arizona (2002), which estab­lished that juries must find each aggra­vat­ing fac­tor nec­es­sary to impose death. The ini­tial list was gen­er­at­ed by Michael Radelet, Professor of Sociology at the University of Colorado-Boulder, and reported the…

Two pros­e­cu­tors with dif­fer­ent philo­soph­i­cal per­spec­tives on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment have called on their respec­tive states to abol­ish cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Boulder County, Colorado, District Attorney Michael Dougherty (pic­tured, left), who oppos­es cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in prin­ci­ple, and for­mer Washoe County, Nevada, homi­cide pros­e­cu­tor Thomas E. Viloria (pic­tured, right), who has suc­cess­ful­ly obtained four death ver­dicts, have…

This is an archival page. To see updat­ed news, please view the lethal injec­tion news and developments feed…

On June 21, 2019, the United States Supreme Court vacat­ed Curtis Flowers’ con­vic­tion in a 7 – 2 deci­sion. For more infor­ma­tion about the opin­ion, read DPIC’s sum­ma­ry here. See also Supreme Court Vacates Conviction in Mississippi Death Penalty Case Finding Race Discrimination in…

In October 2018, the Washington Supreme Court unan­i­mous­ly struck down the state’s death penal­ty, find­ing that it had been​“imposed in an arbi­trary and racial­ly biased man­ner.” In reach­ing its deci­sion in State v. Gregory, the court relied upon a study of twen­­ty-five years of Washington State cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tions that demon­strat­ed that Washington juries were 4.5 times more like­ly to impose a death…

California Governor Gavin Newsom on March 13, 2019 declared a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions in the state with the nation’s largest death row. Newsom imple­ment­ed the mora­to­ri­um through an exec­u­tive order grant­i­ng reprieves to the 737 pris­on­ers cur­rent­ly on California’s death row. He also announced that he was with­draw­ing the state’s exe­cu­tion pro­to­col — the admin­is­tra­tive plan by which exe­cu­tions are car­ried out — and was clos­ing down the state’s execution chamber.

In the past few years, the gov­er­nors of California, Pennsylvania, Washington, Colorado, and Oregon have put a halt to exe­cu­tions in their states because of prob­lems in the death penal­ty sys­tem. Below are some of the rea­sons they gave for for…

Prosecutors in sep­a­rate cap­i­tal cas­es in Indiana, Florida, and Texas have dropped pur­suit of the death penal­ty in order to end noto­ri­ous­ly lengthy delays and facil­i­tate heal­ing for the vic­tims’ fam­i­lies. On March 8, 2019, St. Joseph County, Indiana pros­e­cu­tors agreed to a plea deal instead of a third death-penal­­ty tri­al for Wayne Kubsch (pic­tured) at the request of the vic­tims’ fam­i­ly. Kubsch was…

After con­tro­ver­sial exe­cu­tions raised ques­tions of gov­ern­ment com­pe­tence or mis­con­duct, leg­is­la­tures in two states have respond­ed with bills tak­ing sharply dif­fer­ent approach­es to the ques­tions of gov­ern­ment accountability and…

By an over­whelm­ing 279 – 88 mar­gin, a veto-proof major­i­ty of the New Hampshire House of Representatives vot­ed on March 7, 2019 to repeal the state’s death penal­ty. Demonstrating strong bipar­ti­san sup­port that gar­nered the back­ing of 56 more leg­is­la­tors than an iden­ti­cal repeal bill received in April 2018, the vote end­ed spec­u­la­tion as to how the recon­sti­tut­ed cham­ber would respond to repeal. 93 of the 400 rep­re­sen­ta­tives in the state house who…