Publications & Testimony

Items: 1931 — 1940


Feb 28, 2018

OUTLIER COUNTIES: Death Sentences, Executions More Likely in Hamilton County Than Elsewhere in Ohio

With 24 pris­on­ers cur­rent­ly con­demned to die, Hamilton County—home to Cincinnati—has the largest death row of any coun­ty in Ohio, despite a small­er pop­u­la­tion and a low­er mur­der rate than oth­er parts of the state. Ten of the 55 pris­on­ers exe­cut­ed in the state since the 1970s were sen­tenced to death in Hamilton County, again more than any other Ohio…

Read More

Feb 27, 2018

Arizona Prosecutors Drop Death Penalty in Two Cases, Citing High Costs and Lengthy Legal Process

Prosecutors in Mohave County, Arizona announced in February that they will drop the pur­suit of the death penal­ty in two mur­der cas­es in the coun­ty. Justin Rector and Darrell Ketchner were sep­a­rate­ly charged with first-degree mur­der, and offi­cials said their defense teams had already spent over $2.2 mil­lion prepar­ing for tri­als that are still far from tak­ing place. Mohave County Attorney Matt Smith said, Everybody’s look­ing to save mon­ey and these death penal­ty cases are…

Read More

Feb 22, 2018

Tennessee Attorney General Seeks Eight Execution Dates as Prisoners Challenge Torturous” Drug Protocol

Thirty-three Tennessee death-row pris­on­ers have filed a law­suit chal­leng­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty and legal­i­ty of the state’s new exe­cu­tion pro­to­col, after Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery (pic­tured) asked the state supreme court to expe­dite exe­cu­tions before one of the state’s exe­cu­tion drugs expires. On February 14, Slatery asked the court to sched­ule eight exe­cu­tion to be car­ried out before June 1. Attorneys for the death-row pris­on­ers, who were…

Read More

Feb 21, 2018

Missouri Executed 17 Prisoners With Drugs Secretly Obtained From High-Risk’ Pharmacy Cited for Hazardous Practices

BuzzFeed News inves­ti­ga­tion has dis­closed that Missouri car­ried out sev­en­teen exe­cu­tions between 2014 and 2017 using sup­plies of the drug pen­to­bar­bi­tal it secret­ly obtained from a phar­ma­cy the Food and Drug Administration had clas­si­fied as high risk” because of repeat­ed seri­ous health vio­la­tions. The February 20 exposé describes a com­plex sys­tem of clan­des­tine meet­ings, code names, and undoc­u­ment­ed cash pay­ments that Missouri employed to con­ceal the identity of…

Read More

Feb 20, 2018

Lack of Death-Penalty Counsel Brings Guantánamo War Crimes Trial to a Halt

A Guantánamo mil­i­tary com­mis­sion judge has indef­i­nite­ly sus­pend­ed pro­ceed­ings in the death-penal­ty tri­al of Abd al Rahim al Nashiri, accused of plan­ning al-Qaida’s alleged 2000 bomb­ing of the Navy war­ship USS Cole off the coast of Yemen. Expressing exas­per­a­tion over his con­tin­u­ing inabil­i­ty to com­pel civil­ian death-penal­ty lawyers to return to the case, Air Force Colonel Vance Spath (pic­tured) halt­ed the pro­ceed­ings on February 16. I am…

Read More

Feb 19, 2018

Junk Forensics, Misconduct, and an Inept Defense Raise Questions of Innocence in Arizona Child-Rape/Murder Case

Arizona death-row pris­on­er Barry Jones (pic­tured) has said for the twen­ty-three years he has been on death row that he nev­er raped or mur­dered his girl­friend’s 4‑year-old daugh­ter, Rachel Gray. In a pair of recent arti­cles for The Intercept, reporter Liliana Segura describes the incon­sis­tent med­ical tes­ti­mo­ny, police tun­nel vision,” inept defense lawyer­ing, and oth­er hall­marks of wrong­ful con­vic­tions” that led to a fed­er­al court evidentiary hearing…

Read More

Feb 16, 2018

Is Racially Biased Testimony Wrongly Subjecting Intellectually Disabled Defendants to the Death Penalty?

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2002 deci­sion in Atkins v. Virginia cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly bars states from exe­cut­ing any per­son who has Intellectual Disability. (Daryl Atkins is pic­tured.) However, as report­ed in recent sto­ries in Pacific Standard Magazine and the news­pa­per, The Atlanta Black Star, some states have attempt­ed to cir­cum­vent the Atkins rul­ing by using social stereo­types and race as grounds to argue that defen­dants of col­or are not intellectually…

Read More