Publications & Testimony

Items: 2281 — 2290


Dec 02, 2016

OUTLIER COUNTIES: Dallas County, Texas Imposing Fewer Death Sentences After Years of Discrimination

With 55 exe­cu­tions since the 1970s, Dallas County, Texas, ranks sec­ond among all U.S. coun­ties — behind only Harris County (Houston), Texas — in the num­ber of pris­on­ers it has put to death. It is also among the 2% of coun­ties that account for more than half of all pris­on­ers on death row across the coun­try, and pro­duced sev­en new death sen­tences and one resen­tence between 2010 and 2015, more than 99.5% of all U.S. counties…

Read More

Dec 01, 2016

Missouri is Disproportionately Producing Federal Death Sentences Amidst Pattern of Inadequate Representation

Federal cap­i­tal defen­dants are dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly sen­tenced to death in Missouri com­pared to oth­er states, with 14.5% of the 62 pris­on­ers cur­rent­ly on fed­er­al death row hav­ing been pros­e­cut­ed in Missouri’s fed­er­al dis­trict courts. By con­trast, a DPIC analy­sis of FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Statistics shows that Missouri account­ed for only 2.26% of mur­ders in the United States between 1988, when the cur­rent fed­er­al death penal­ty statute was…

Read More

Nov 30, 2016

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Argument in Texas Intellectual Disability Case

During argu­ment November 29 in the case of Moore v. Texas, the U.S. Supreme Court expressed skep­ti­cism about Texas’ idio­syn­crat­ic method of decid­ing whether a cap­i­tal defen­dant has Intellectual Disability and is there­fore inel­i­gi­ble for the death penal­ty. A tri­al court, apply­ing the cri­te­ria for Intellectual Disability estab­lished by the med­ical com­mu­ni­ty, found that Bobby James Moore (pic­tured) was not…

Read More

Nov 29, 2016

Florida Supreme Court Orders Re-Sentencing, Suggesting Hurst May Affect Many Florida Cases

On November 23, the Florida Supreme Court over­turned the death sen­tence imposed by a judge on Richard Franklin after his jury split 9 – 3 in rec­om­mend­ing he receive the death penal­ty for a 2012 mur­der.​“In light of the non-unan­i­­mous jury rec­om­men­da­tion to impose a death sen­tence,” the court found that the death sen­tence vio­lat­ed Franklin’s right to have a unan­i­mous jury deter­mi­na­tion of all facts nec­es­sary to impose a death penalty…

Read More

Nov 28, 2016

Judge Grants Dylann Roof’s Request to Represent Himself in Federal Death Penalty Trial

U.S. District Court Judge Richard M. Gergel grant­ed a request on November 28 from Dylann Roof (pic­tured), the 22-year-old charged with the mur­ders of nine mem­bers of the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, to rep­re­sent him­self in his fed­er­al cap­i­tal tri­al. Judge Gergel described Roof’s deci­sion as​“strate­gi­cal­ly unwise,” but said,​“It is a deci­sion you have the right to make.” A crim­i­nal defen­dan­t’s right to…

Read More

Nov 23, 2016

NEW VOICES: Special Olympics Chair Urges Supreme Court to Strike Down Texas’ Horrific’ Criteria for Determining Intellectual Disability

Timothy Shriver (pic­tured), the Chairman of the Special Olympics, has called on the U.S. Supreme Court to end Texas’​“use of stig­ma­tiz­ing stereo­types” in deter­min­ing whether a defen­dant has Intellectual Disability and is there­fore inel­i­gi­ble for exe­cu­tion. On November 29, the Court will hear argu­ment in Moore v. Texas, a case chal­leng­ing Texas’ use of the​“Briseño fac­tors” — a set of…

Read More

Nov 21, 2016

OUTLIER COUNTIES: Los Angeles County Has Nation’s Largest — And Still Expanding — Death Row

Los Angeles County, California is the home of the nation’s largest death row, one that sta­tis­tics show con­tin­ues to rapid­ly grow. In January 2013, Los Angeles was respon­si­ble for more death row pris­on­ers than any oth­er coun­ty in the United States, and it has ranked as one of the two most pro­lif­ic coun­ties in impos­ing new death sen­tences each year since. The 31 death sen­tences imposed in the coun­ty between 2010 and 2015 are more than any…

Read More

Nov 18, 2016

BOOKS: The Case of Rose Bird,” and the Continuing Power of Money in Judicial Elections

In 1986, California vot­ers removed Rose Bird, the state’s first female supreme court chief jus­tice, from office after con­ser­v­a­tive groups spent more than $10 mil­lion in a recall effort that por­trayed her as​“soft on crime,” empha­siz­ing her court opin­ions over­turn­ing death sen­tences that had been uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly imposed. Ten years lat­er, Tennessee Supreme Court Justice Penny White lost a reten­tion elec­tion after death penalty…

Read More