Publications & Testimony

Items: 4831 — 4840


Jun 21, 2007

Strong Criticism of Tennessee’s Death Penalty System from Federal Appellate Judge

Dissenting from a U.S. Court of Appeals deci­sion deny­ing relief to Gary Cone, Judge Merritt sharply crit­i­cized the Tennessee Attorney General for fal­si­fi­ca­tion” of the record, and he referred to the state’s judi­cial sys­tem as bro­ken” and inat­ten­tive.” Cone had been grant­ed relief on two oth­er occa­sions by the same Sixth Circuit, but those deci­sions were reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court. In the present case, Cone claimed that sig­nif­i­cant mit­i­gat­ing evi­dence had been with­held by the state…

Read More

Jun 20, 2007

BOOKS: DeathQuest III by Robert Bohm

In the third edi­tion of what some have called the first true text­book on the death penal­ty,” author Robert Bohm, a cor­rec­tion­al offi­cer turned col­lege pro­fes­sor, engages the read­er with a full account of the argu­ments and issues sur­round­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. His book, DeathQuest III: An Introduction to the Theory & Practice of Capital Punishment in the United States,” begins with the his­to­ry of the death penal­ty from colo­nial to mod­ern times, and then exam­ines the moral and…

Read More

Jun 19, 2007

Texas Scores Poorly in Mental Health Services While Executing Many with Mental Illness

A recent study con­duct­ed by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) has revealed that Texas is almost last among states in spend­ing on men­tal health ser­vices and per­forms poor­ly in oth­er men­tal health areas. According to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Texas ranked 47th in the nation in per-capi­ta spend­ing on men­tal health ser­vices, and received a grade of D” for infor­ma­tion access and a grade of C”…

Read More

Jun 17, 2007

IN THEORY: Opinions on the death penalty

June 17, 2007 The Daily PilotMany aca­d­e­mics in recent years have been argu­ing that their stud­ies prove the death penal­ty deters mur­der. The var­i­ous stud­ies show that between 3 and 18 lives could be saved by exe­cut­ing a con­vict­ed killer. Critics ques­tion the data, say­ing that the experts made mis­takes in their method­ol­o­gy. What do you think of this recent data? Has it affect­ed your posi­tion on the issue? Judaism has always believed in cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment based upon Biblical Law. A man must…

Read More

Jun 14, 2007

BOOKS: The Big Eddy Club” Explores Race and the Death Penalty

In his new book, The Big Eddy Club: The Stocking Stranglings and Southern Justice,” author David Rose exam­ines issues of race and the death penal­ty. The book relates the sto­ry of Carlton Gary, who was con­vict­ed of cap­i­tal mur­der in 1986 and remains on Georgia’s death row for the rape and mur­der of sev­er­al elder­ly women in Columbus, Georgia. Rose, a con­tribut­ing edi­tor at Vanity Fair, links Gary’s con­vic­tion to a his­to­ry of bias in Columbus and the South. The Big Eddy Club” details…

Read More

Jun 14, 2007

New Mexico Trial Judge Finds State Death Penalty Unconstitutional

Ruling in a pre-tri­al mat­ter in New Mexico, Judge Timothy Garcia of Santa Fe County’s First Judicial District Court held the state’s death penal­ty law to be uncon­sti­tu­tion­al based on a study by the Capital Jury Project. The Project’s research in 14 states had found that jurors often do not fol­low the law in mak­ing their sen­tenc­ing deci­sion. In par­tic­u­lar, the judge found that the jurors’ propen­si­ty toward mak­ing their sen­tenc­ing deci­sion dur­ing the guilt-inno­cence phase of the…

Read More

Jun 13, 2007

Supreme Court Decision Allows Broader Exclusion of Jurors, But May Further Isolate the Death Penalty

The U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sion in Uttecht v. Brown on June 4, 2007 appears to enhance the state’s abil­i­ty to remove poten­tial jurors with doubts about the death penal­ty. But by expand­ing the class of peo­ple who can­not serve on cap­i­tal juries, the deci­sion may ulti­mate­ly ren­der the death penal­ty invalid as juries fail to rep­re­sent the true diver­si­ty of the American pub­lic. In a 5 – 4 deci­sion over­turn­ing an opin­ion writ­ten by Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the…

Read More

Jun 12, 2007

Texas Court Grants Stay on Basis of Possible Innocence

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals stayed Cathy Hendersons sched­uled exe­cu­tion of June 13 and has remand­ed her case back to the tri­al court for a more care­ful review of new sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence that casts doubt on the state’s claim that she inten­tion­al­ly killed Brandon Baugh, an infant in her care. The appeals court deci­sion was large­ly based on a recent affi­davit sub­mit­ted by for­mer Travis County med­ical exam­in­er Dr. Roberto Bayardo (pic­tured), whose expert tes­ti­mo­ny was crucial to…

Read More

Jun 11, 2007

Tennessee Legislature Overwhelmingly Approves Death Penalty Study

By a vote of 79 – 14, the Tennessee House of Representatives passed bipar­ti­san leg­is­la­tion cre­at­ing a study com­mis­sion to exam­ine the state’s death penal­ty sys­tem. A sim­i­lar mea­sure unan­i­mous­ly passed the state’s Senate in May, just one month after the American Bar Association issued a report find­ing that the state was not in full com­pli­ance with most of the bench­marks estab­lished to guar­an­tee a fair death penal­ty sys­tem. The new com­mis­sion will con­sist of rep­re­sen­ta­tives from the…

Read More

Jun 11, 2007

Rwanda Votes to Abolish the Death Penalty

Rwandas par­lia­ment has vot­ed to abol­ish the death penal­ty and replace it with life with­out parole, a move that offi­cials hope will clear the way for sus­pects in the nation’s 1994 geno­cide to be extra­dit­ed back to Rwanda for tri­al. Many of the sus­pects are believed to be at large in Europe, North America, and West Africa, regions where many coun­tries refuse to extra­dite crim­i­nal sus­pects to nations that con­tin­ue to prac­tice cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment or tor­ture. Rwandan genocide…

Read More