Death Penalty News and Developments for November 4 — November 102019

NEWS — November 8: Georgia death-row pris­on­er Ray Cromartie, sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed November 13, filed a motion to reopen his fed­er­al habeas cor­pus pro­ceed­ings based upon new evi­dence of inno­cence. Cromartie’s motion con­tains an affi­davit from his co-defen­dant — pros­e­cu­tion wit­ness, Thaddeus Lucas — that a sec­ond co-defen­dant, Corey Clark, had admit­ted to hav­ing shot Richard Slysz dur­ing the rob­bery of a con­ve­nience store. Cromartie was sen­tenced to death by the jury under the belief that he was the shoot­er. The Georgia courts have denied Cromartie’s request for DNA test­ing of the mur­der weapon, which he says will prove he was not the killer. Mr. Slyz’s daugh­ter, Elizabeth Legette, sup­ports Cromartie’s efforts to obtain DNA testing.

Lucas, who was a long-time friend of Clark’s, is Cromartie’s step-broth­er, but did not know Cromartie or that he had a step-broth­er until Lucas was 18 years old.


NEWS — November 7: The Ohio Supreme Court has vacat­ed the death sen­tence imposed on Shawn Ford and returned the case to the tri­al court to prop­er­ly deter­mine” whether Ford has Intellectual Disability. The court said the tri­al court had erred in reject­ing Ford’s claim of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty when it failed to account for cer­tain fac­tors that may have inflat­ed Ford’s IQ score and when it ana­lyzed the adap­tive skills he pos­sessed instead of con­sid­er­ing the areas in which he had functional deficits.


NEWS — November 7: The Florida Supreme Court issued opin­ions deny­ing relief in two cap­i­tal post-conviction cases. 

In the case of Michael Bell, sen­tenced to death in 1995, the court reject­ed Bell’s claim that his lawyer was inef­fec­tive for inject­ing racial bias and prej­u­dice into his death penal­ty tri­al. Bell had argued that the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017 deci­sion in Buck v. Davis estab­lished that defense coun­sel’s per­for­mance is inef­fec­tive per se when he or she injects racial bias and prej­u­dice into a crim­i­nal tri­al. The court ruled that Bell’s claim was untime­ly because Buck did not cre­ate a new rule of law that would have per­mit­ted Bell to file a new post-con­vic­tion peti­tion. It fur­ther held that Bell’s inef­fec­tive­ness claim had been pre­vi­ous­ly lit­i­gat­ed and reject­ed in an ear­li­er pro­ceed­ing under the pre-Buck caselaw on inef­fec­tive assis­tance of counsel.

In the case of Charles Brant, the court ruled that the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sion in Hurst v. Florida, which pro­vides that a cap­i­tal defen­dant has the right to a jury deter­mi­na­tion of all facts nec­es­sary to impose the death penal­ty, did not enti­tle him to a new sen­tenc­ing tri­al because he had waived his right to a jury tri­al and elect­ed to be sen­tenced in a judge-only proceeding. 


NEWS — November 6: Quentin Smith was sen­tenced to life in prison after a Franklin County (Columbus), Ohio jury was unable to reach a unan­i­mous sen­tenc­ing rec­om­men­da­tion in a high-pro­file cap­i­tal mur­der tri­al involv­ing the killing of two police offi­cers. The aggra­vat­ing evi­dence in the case was off­set by defense evi­dence that Smith suf­fers from post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­or­der, bipo­lar dis­or­der, and bor­der­line per­son­al­i­ty dis­or­der as a result of chron­ic child­hood trau­ma, abuse, and neglect. 


2019 Executions Through November 10

South Dakota’s exe­cu­tion of Charles Rhines on November 3 and Texas’ exe­cu­tion of Justen Hall on November 6 were the 18th and 19th exe­cu­tions in the United States in 2019. As of November 10, sev­en death war­rants were pend­ing for the remain­der of 2019, includ­ing one Texas case, Patrick Murphy, in which a deci­sion was still pend­ing on Texas pros­e­cu­tors’ appeal of a stay of execution. 

Status of Remaining 2019 Death Warrants