Death-Penalty News and Developments for the Week of August 26 – September 12019

NEWS — August 30: A Tennessee tri­al judge has approved a plea deal to vacate the death sen­tence of Abu-Ali Abdur’Rahman as a result of pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al mis­con­duct. Abdur’Rahman, who was sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed next year, argued that pros­e­cu­tor John Zimmerman exclud­ed poten­tial jurors based on race dur­ing Abdur’Rahman’s 1987 cap­i­tal tri­al. The cur­rent dis­trict attor­ney’s office agreed with Abdur’Rahman that his tri­al was infect­ed by overt racial bias” and that as a result his sen­tence should be reduced. Earlier this week, the defense and pros­e­cu­tion pre­sent­ed to a Davidson County cir­cuit court a pro­posed order to reduce Abdur’Rahman’s sen­tence to life.


NEWS — August 29: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has denied the habeas cor­pus chal­lenge of Kentucky death-row pris­on­er Mitchell Willoughby. Willoughby argued that his con­vic­tion and death sen­tence should be reversed as a result of pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al mis­con­duct and a juror’s use of the Bible instead of state law through­out the tri­al and in delib­er­a­tions. The fed­er­al appeals court ruled that Willoughby could not jus­ti­fy his fail­ure to raise the juror mis­con­duct issue in a time­ly man­ner and that Willoughby’s argu­ments about pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al mis­con­duct had not demon­strat­ed an unrea­son­able appli­ca­tion of fed­er­al law by the Kentucky courts. A dis­sent­ing judge would have grant­ed relief based on a pros­e­cu­tor’s com­ments that min­i­mized the jury’s role in death sentencing.


NEWS — August 26: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has grant­ed fed­er­al habeas relief to Oklahoma death-row pris­on­er Roderick L. Smith on his intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty claim. Smith’s claim was denied by Oklahoma courts, but he argued that these deci­sions were incon­sis­tent with the US Supreme Court prece­dent in Atkins v. Virginia and sub­se­quent cas­es. The 10th Circuit agreed, con­clud­ing that a rea­son­able jury would be com­pelled to find Smith intellectually disabled.