Death-Penalty News and Developments for the Week of June 2430, 2019: New Mexico Supreme Court Clears the State’s Death Row

NEWS: JUNE 28The New Mexico Supreme Court has over­turned the death sen­tences of the two pris­on­ers who had remained on the state’s death row after the leg­is­la­ture repealed the state’s death-penal­ty statute in 2009. In 3 – 2 deci­sions in Fry v. Lopez and Allen v. Lemaster, the court found that the death sen­tences imposed on Robert Fry and Timothy Allen were dis­pro­por­tion­ate to oth­er equal­ly hor­ren­dous cas­es in which defen­dants were not sen­tenced to death.” The jus­tices vacat­ed the death sen­tences and direct­ed that Fry and Allen be resen­tenced to life without parole. 


NEWS: JUNE 28 — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld the death sen­tence imposed on Georgia death-row pris­on­er Billy Raulerson, Jr., rul­ing that that the Georgia courts had not unrea­son­ably applied clear­ly estab­lished fed­er­al con­sti­tu­tion­al law when they reject­ed his chal­lenges to his death sen­tence based upon intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty and inef­fec­tive rep­re­sen­ta­tion. Georgia is the only state that requires a defen­dant to prove his or her intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty beyond a rea­son­able doubt as a pre­con­di­tion for enforc­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­hi­bi­tion against exe­cut­ing a per­son with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty.


NEWS: JUNE 27The en banc U.S Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has over­turned a pan­el deci­sion that had grant­ed a new sen­tenc­ing hear­ing to Oklahoma death-row pris­on­er James Pavatt. The pan­el had over­turned Pavatt’s death sen­tence on the grounds that the Oklahoma state courts had applied an uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly vague inter­pre­ta­tion of the state’s espe­cial­ly heinous, atro­cious, or cru­el” aggra­vat­ing cir­cum­stances to jus­ti­fy Pavatt’s death sen­tence. The en banc court did not reach the mer­its of Pavatt’s chal­lenge to the aggra­vat­ing cir­cum­stance, instead rul­ing that his claim was procedurally barred.


NEWS: The U.S. Supreme Court has issued sev­er­al deci­sions relat­ing to death-penalty cases.

JUNE 24The Court grant­ed a motion by National Public Radio and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press to unseal the plead­ings in Price v. Dunn relat­ing to Christopher Price’s unsuc­cess­ful chal­lenge to Alabamas exe­cu­tion pro­to­col. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office did not oppose the motion.

The Court denied cer­tio­rari in Weisheit v. Indiana, declin­ing to review the Indiana courts’ denial of Jeffrey Weisheits post-con­vic­tion chal­lenge to the death sen­tence imposed in con­nec­tion with his con­vic­tions for arson and mur­der in a house fire in which his two chil­dren were killed. Weisheit had asked the Court to review the state courts’ res­o­lu­tion of his claim that his lawyer pro­vid­ed inef­fec­tive rep­re­sen­ta­tion in the penal­ty-phase of his trial.

The Court also denied cer­tio­rari in Wood v. Carpenter, in which Oklahoma death-row pris­on­er Tremane Wood had sought review of the Oklahoma fed­er­al courts’ han­dling of his claim that his lawyer was inef­fec­tive in the penal­ty-phase of his cap­i­tal tri­al. Wood pre­sent­ed evi­dence that his lawyer, John Albert, was abus­ing alco­hol dur­ing the tri­al and faced dis­ci­pli­nary based upon his con­duct in two oth­er cap­i­tal cas­es around the time rep­re­sent­ed Mr. Wood. Albert was found to have pro­vid­ed inef­fec­tive rep­re­sen­ta­tion in both of those cases.

JUNE 28 — The Court sched­uled Carpenter v. Murphy for rear­gu­ment in the Fall Supreme Court term. The case, which was orig­i­nal­ly argued in November 2018, rais­es the ques­tion of whether the mur­der for which Muscogee (Creek) Nation mem­ber Patrick Dwayne Murphy was sen­tenced to death in Oklahoma occurred on trib­al lands under exclu­sive fed­er­al juris­dic­tion or on state lands. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit inval­i­dat­ed Murphy’s con­vic­tion and death sen­tence in August 2017, rul­ing that the mur­der occurred on trib­al lands with­in the bor­ders of the Creek Reservation.


RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITYThe Oregon leg­is­la­ture has tak­en the final steps in pass­ing a bill to sig­nif­i­cant­ly lim­it the scope of the state’s death-penal­ty statute. In a Saturday vote on June 29 — the day before the close of the state leg­isla­tive ses­sion — the Oregon Senate con­curred in House amend­ments to the pro­pos­al, which restricts the death penal­ty to acts of ter­ror­ism in which more than one per­son is killed; mur­ders by pris­on­ers already incar­cer­at­ed for a pri­or homi­cide; mur­ders of chil­dren aged 13 or younger; and killings of police offi­cers or oth­er law enforce­ment offi­cials. The bill now advances to Gov. Kate Brown, who has pre­vi­ous­ly imposed a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions in the state.


NEWS: JUNE 19The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has denied a cer­tifi­cate of appeal­a­bil­i­ty to Texas death-row pris­on­er John Steven Gardner, refus­ing him per­mis­sion to appeal a fed­er­al dis­trict court’s dis­missal of his chal­lenge to his con­vic­tion and death sen­tence. The Fifth Circuit denies a high­er per­cent­age of cer­tifi­cates of appeal­a­bil­i­ty in cap­i­tal cas­es than any oth­er cir­cuit, dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly depriv­ing death-row pris­on­ers of appel­late review in their habeas corpus cases.