Kentucky Governor Supports Ban on Executing Juvenile Offenders


Governor Paul Patton stat­ed that he would sup­port a bill to ban the exe­cu­tion of those who com­mit­ted cap­i­tal crimes as juve­niles. The death penal­ty is for cas­es that cry out for it,” said Patton. It’s not for every case.” Dennis Fleming, Patton’s gen­er­al coun­sel, stat­ed that the gov­er­nor ques­tions whether 16 or 17-year-olds are capa­ble of ful­ly under­stand­ing the con­se­quences of their actions.” The pro­posed leg­is­la­tion may also have sup­port from a num­ber of state pros­e­cu­tors, accord­ing to George Moore, pres­i­dent of the Kentucky Commonwealth’s Attorneys Association. (Courier-Journal (Kentucky), 10/​17/​01)
If passed, the leg­is­la­tion would not apply retroac­tive­ly to Kevin Stanford, the only juve­nile offend­er on Kentucky’s death row. Patton, how­ev­er, stat­ed that he would have reser­va­tions about sign­ing a death war­rant for an inmate con­vict­ed of a mur­der he com­mit­ted when he was 17. The Governor said he would exam­ine Stanford’s case close­ly” if the leg­is­la­tion pro­hibit­ing such exe­cu­tions was enact­ed and Stanford exhaust­ed his appeals dur­ing Patton’s term. (Lexington Herald-Leader, 10/​18/​01)

Juvenile Offender Executed in Texas


Gerald Mitchell was exe­cut­ed in Texas on October 22 for a shoot­ing and rob­bery he com­mit­ted when he was 17-years old. (Associated Press, 10/​23/​01) This is the 18th exe­cu­tion of a juve­nile offend­er since the death penal­ty was rein­stat­ed and the only one this year.
Texas has account­ed for more than half of the juve­nile offend­ers exe­cut­ed in the U.S. since 1976. In the past 2 years, only Texas and Virginia have exe­cut­ed juve­nile offend­ers, and Virginia cur­rent­ly has no such offend­ers on its death row.

No More Juvenile Offenders on Virginia’s Death Row


The Virginia Supreme Court recent­ly over­turned the death sen­tence of the only juve­nile offend­er on Virginia’s death row. The court ruled that Shermaine A. Johnson’s death sen­tence should be vacat­ed and he should receive a new sen­tenc­ing tri­al because his jury was not told that Johnson would not be eli­gi­ble for parole if sen­tenced to life impris­on­ment. The state attor­ney gen­er­al’s office acknowl­edged that Johnson’s jury should have been told that a life sen­tence real­ly meant life. (Washington Post, 9/​25/​01) Last year, the only oth­er juve­nile offend­er on Virginia’s death row, Chauncey Jackson, had his con­vic­tion over­turned. The state decid­ed not to pur­sue the death penal­ty at his re-trial.

Texas Legislators Urge Governor to Commute Juvenile Death Sentence


Eighteen state leg­is­la­tors asked Texas Governor Rick Perry to com­mute Napolean Beazley’s death sen­tence, cit­ing the fact that he was only 17 at the time of the crime. Texas’ prac­tice of exe­cut­ing juve­nile offend­ers like Napoleon runs counter to a well-estab­lished world­wide norm,” the law­mak­ers wrote. Every nation with a work­ing gov­ern­ment, except the United States, has rat­i­fied the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which bars giv­ing the death sen­tence to any­one under 18 at the time of the offense.” The let­ter also not­ed that Smith County state District Judge Cynthia Stevens Kent, who presided over Beazley’s tri­al, had also writ­ten to Perry and rec­om­mend­ed that he com­mute Beazley’s death sen­tence because of his age at the time of the crime. (Houston Chronicle, 9/​20/​01)

Texas Court Grants Stay for Juvenile Offender

Napoleon

Beazley was grant­ed a stay of exe­cu­tion by the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals just hours before his sched­uled exe­cu­tion. (Associated Press, 

8/​15/​01) Beazley, who was 17 at the time of the crime, would have been 

the 18th juve­nile offend­er exe­cut­ed since the death penalty was 

rein­stat­ed, and the 10th juve­nile offend­er exe­cut­ed in Texas.

The American Bar Association, the Children’s Defense Fund, the European

Union, and the National Mental Health Association have all written 

let­ters to Texas Governor Perry ask­ing that he commute Beazley’s 

sen­tence. The let­ters note the inter­na­tion­al con­sen­sus against executing

juve­nile offend­ers, and point out that exe­cut­ing Beazley is contrary to

the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the 

American Convention on Human Rights. Among those call­ing for clemency is

Amnesty International, which released a report on Beazley’s case, 

United States of America: Too young to vote, old enough to be 

exe­cut­ed.” The report high­lights the inter­na­tion­al, racial, and fairness

issues sur­round­ing Beazley’s case. Beazley, an African-American, was 

sen­tenced to death by an all-white jury for the 1994 killing of John 

Luttig, a white busi­ness­man whose son is a fed­er­al appeals court judge. 

At Beazley’s tri­al, his co-defen­dants tes­ti­fied against him, but have 

since signed affi­davits admit­ting that much of their critical trial 

tes­ti­mo­ny was untrue. They also admit that they tes­ti­fied for the state 

against Beazley on the basis of an undis­closed deal that secured them 

life sen­tences. (Amnesty International News Release, 7/​31/​01 and the 

American Bar Association’s Juvenile Justice Project)

Read the report, United States of America: Too young to vote, old enough to be exe­cut­ed.” For more infor­ma­tion, see the American Bar Association’s Juvenile Justice Project’s Web page on Napoleon Beazley.

Victims’ Mother Asks Governor to Grant Clemency in Case of Juvenile Offender Recently Granted a Stay by the U.S. Supreme Court

Antonio Richardson,

who was sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed on March 7, 2001 in Missouri, was 

grant­ed a stay by the U.S. Supreme Court. Among those try­ing to prevent 

his exe­cu­tion is Ginny Kerry, moth­er of the mur­der vic­tims, who asked 

the Governor to spare Richardson’s life. Richardson, who was 16 at the 

time of the crime, was orig­i­nal­ly offered a life sen­tence in exchange 

for a guilty plea. Pressured by a local activist, Richardson rejected 

the plea and was con­vict­ed. Richardson’s lawyer had never participated 

in the penal­ty phase of a cap­i­tal tri­al, and failed to present expert 

tes­ti­mo­ny as to Richardson’s men­tal retar­da­tion and brain dam­age. When 

the jury dead­locked on whether or not to impose the death penal­ty, the 

deci­sion went to the judge, who sen­tenced Richardson to death. 

Currently, a bill is pend­ing in the Missouri leg­is­la­ture to exclude the 

men­tal­ly retard­ed from exe­cu­tion. (American Bar Association’s Juvenile 

Justice Center, Execution Alert, 2/​15/​01).

For more infor­ma­tion on Antonio Richardson and his case, including 

recent news arti­cles, please vis­it the ABA Juvenile Justice Center’s Web

page at www​.abanet​.org/​c​r​i​m​j​u​s​t​/​j​u​v​j​u​s​/​r​i​c​h​a​r​d​s​o​n​.html.