On May 24, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to con­sid­er whether a Texas death row inmate’s request for DNA test­ing can be con­sid­ered as a civ­il rights claim rather than part of his death penal­ty appeal. The Court stayed Hank Skinners exe­cu­tion on March 24, just one hour before he was to be put to death. Skinner, who has always main­tained his inno­cence of the 1993 mur­ders of his girl­friend and her two sons, has request­ed that Texas per­form DNA test­ing on key pieces of evi­dence that may point to anoth­er sus­pect. Although some evi­dence from the crime scene was test­ed pri­or to Skinner’s tri­al, Texas has sub­se­quent­ly repeat­ed­ly blocked DNA test­ing of oth­er evi­dence from the vic­tim’s body. The orig­i­nal DNA test­ing tend­ed to show that Skinner was present at the crime scene, a fact he does not dis­pute. Lower fed­er­al courts have been split on whether such a chal­lenge can be brought as a civ­il rights claim, there­by avoid­ing the tight restric­tions applied to death penal­ty appeals. The case is Skinner v. Switzer, No. 09 – 9000, and is like­ly to be argued in the fall of 2010.

(A. Turner, High court to review Skinner’s request for DNA test,” Houston Chronicle, May 24, 2010). See also Innocence and U.S. Supreme Court.

Citation Guide