Michael Hall was sen­tenced to death in 2000 in Texas for kid­nap­ping and mur­der. At the time of his tri­al, his IQ was mea­sured at 67. Generally, a per­son with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty is defined as some­one with an IQ of 70 or low­er, along with lim­i­ta­tions in adap­tive skills. In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. Virginia that exe­cut­ing some­one who has an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty (men­tal retar­da­tion) con­sti­tutes cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment, but the high court left it to each state to define and enforce the pro­hi­bi­tion. State and fed­er­al judges in Texas have ruled that, even though Hall is men­tal­ly slow, he does not demon­strate an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty suf­fi­cient to be exempt­ed from cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in Texas. Lawyers for Hall peti­tioned the high court to exam­ine whether Texas has adopt­ed ade­quate pro­ce­dures to deter­mine whether some­one has an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty and whether those pro­ce­dures were fol­lowed in Hall’s case in line with con­sti­tu­tion­al safe­guards. The Supreme Court has declined to take up Hall’s appeal.

(W. Richey, Refused by Supreme Court: Is death row inmate men­tal­ly retard­ed?,” Christian Science Monitor, October 20, 2010). See also Intellectual Disability and U.S. Supreme Court.

Citation Guide