On June 24, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Billy Joe Magwood, an Alabama defen­dant con­vict­ed of a 1979 mur­der whose chal­lenge to the state’s death penal­ty law had been ruled untime­ly by low­er courts. Magwood’s first death sen­tence was over­turned, but he was sen­tenced to death a sec­ond time. When Magwood filed a habeas peti­tion chal­leng­ing his new death sen­tence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that Magwood’s chal­lenge to his new death sen­tence was an unre­view­able sec­ond or suc­ces­sive” chal­lenge since he could have brought the same chal­lenge to his first death sen­tence. Justice Clarence Thomas, writ­ing for the major­i­ty of the U.S. Supreme Court, said because Magwood’s habeas appli­ca­tion chal­lenges a new judg­ment for the first time, it is not sec­ond or suc­ces­sive.’ ” The Supreme Court deci­sion allows Magwood to chal­lenge his sec­ond death sen­tence as a brand new judg­ment, even if it rais­es issues that could have been made against the orig­i­nal sen­tence. Justices Stevens, Scalia, Breyer, and Sotomayor con­curred. Justice Kennedy, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Ginsburg and Alito, dissented.

(K. Russell, Court rules in favor of cap­i­tal defen­dant in Magwood v. Patterson,” SCOTUSblog, June 24, 2010; M. Orndorff, Alabama death sen­tence reversed by U.S. Supreme Court,” Birmingham News, June 24, 2010; Magwood v. Patterson, No. 09 – 158 (June 24, 2010)). Read full text of the opin­ion here. Read more U.S. Supreme Court deci­sions here.

Citation Guide