Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Dec 092010

Possible Case of Innocence on California’s Death Row

A recent op-ed by Pulitzer Prize-win­n­ing colum­nist Nicholas Kristof (pic­tured) of the New York Times focus­es on the pos­si­ble inno­cence of Kevin Cooper, a black defen­dant on Californias death row. Kristof writes, This case is a trav­es­ty. It under­scores the cen­tral pit­fall of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment: no sys­tem is fail-safe. How can we be about to exe­cute a man when even some of America’s lead­ing judges believe he has been framed?” Cooper…

Read More

News 

Dec 082010

NEW RESOURCES: Costs of Representation in Federal Death Penalty Cases

A recent report to the Committee on Defender Services of the Judicial Conference of the United States by Jon Gould and Lisa Greenman pro­vid­ed an update on the costs of rep­re­sen­ta­tion in fed­er­al death penal­ty cas­es. The report exam­ined all cas­es in which the fed­er­al death penal­ty was autho­rized by the U.S. Attorney General between 1998 and 2004. The authors found that The medi­an cost of a case in which the Attorney General autho­rized seek­ing the death penal­ty was nearly…

Read More

News 

Dec 072010

Supreme Court Declines to Take Case of Federal Death Row Inmate With Mental Retardation

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the appeal of Bruce Webster, an inmate on the fed­er­al death row with evi­dence that he is intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abed. In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. Virginia that the exe­cu­tion of a per­son with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties (men­tal retar­da­tion) would be uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. Webster’s evi­dence indi­cates that three fed­er­al doc­tors deter­mined he had an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty when he applied for disability…

Read More

News 

Dec 062010

Lack of Qualified Attorneys in California Delays Death Penalty Cases

A short­age of qual­i­fied crim­i­nal defense lawyers in California has caused major delays in the state’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment sys­tem. Nearly half of those sen­tenced to death in California are wait­ing for the state to appoint them a post-con­vic­­tion attor­ney. Death row inmates wait an aver­age of 10 – 12 years. The long delay is attrib­uted to the lack of expe­ri­enced lawyers to take on this part of the appeals process. The California Supreme Court requires that lawyers…

Read More

News 

Dec 032010

OP-ED: Capital Punishment and Human Fallibility”

A recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal by Barry Scheck, co-direc­­tor of the Innocence Project, high­lighs flaws in Texas’s death penal­ty sys­tem that led to the exe­cu­tion of Claude Jones (pic­tured). Then-gov­­er­nor George Bush reject­ed Jones’s appli­ca­tion for a reprieve. Bush was not informed that the reprieve would allow time for DNA tests to be per­formed on a strand of hair that was found at the crime scene. This hair had been…

Read More

News 

Dec 022010

Conditions on Death Row in Texas

In an article entitled Solitary Men” in The Texas Observer, Dave Mann describes the con­di­tions for inmates on Texass death row. Inmates in the Polunsky Unit near Livingston, Texas, spend almost their entire time alone in a 60-square-foot cell. He writes, The cells have a small win­dow at one end. The steel door has a nar­row win­dow and, at the bot­tom, a slit through which guards slide trays of food.…Little pen­e­trates these cement boxes except…

Read More

News 

Dec 012010

OP-ED: America’s Death Penalty Broken Beyond Repair”

An op-ed by Bob Herbert of the New York Times high­lights issues raised by for­mer Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens that changed his mind on the death penal­ty in the U.S. Herbert cites infor­ma­tion col­lect­ed by the Death Penalty Information Center and points to shod­dy defense and state mis­con­duct in the delib­er­ate with­hold­ing of evi­dence as promi­nent abus­es in the system. Executions have been upheld in cas­es in which defense…

Read More

News 

Nov 292010

Revision to List of Exonerated Individuals

Thanks to addi­tion­al research by Prof. Samuel Gross of the University of Michigan, DPIC has learned that one of the indi­vid­u­als on its list of exon­er­at­ed death row inmates had con­ced­ed his guilt to a less­er offense in con­nec­tion with the crime that orig­i­nal­ly sent him to death row. He was, how­ev­er, acquit­ted on the mur­der charge. James Bo Cochran was orig­i­nal­ly found guilty of a 1976 mur­der in Alabama in con­nec­tion with a rob­bery at a gro­cery store. His first…

Read More

News 

Nov 282010

NEW RESOURCES: Congressional Quarterly Publishes Death Penalty Review

Kenneth Jost of Congressional Quarterly has pre­pared a com­pre­hen­sive review of the death penal­ty in the U.S. for the recent edi­tion of the CQ Researcher. The overview looks at death penal­ty trends in the past 10 years, pub­lic opin­ion, and argu­ments for and against repeal­ing the death penal­ty. Jost quotes many experts, includ­ing DPIC’s Executive Director con­cern­ing the recent direc­tion of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in the U.S. “ The decline in the use of the death…

Read More

News 

Nov 242010

Tennessee Judge Declares State’s Execution Process Unconstitutional; Other States Confront Same Issue

On Nov.19, a Davidson County judge ruled that Tennessees lethal injec­tion pro­ce­dure was uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, pos­si­bly delay­ing the exe­cu­tion of Stephen Michael West and oth­ers on death row. Chancellor Claudia Bonnyman, who issued the rul­ing, said that the state’s lethal injection procedure allows for death by suf­fo­ca­tion while con­scious,” because it did not spec­i­fy a suf­fi­cient dosage for sodi­um thiopen­tal, the first of three drugs used in lethal injec­tions. In Baze v.

Read More