Publications & Testimony

Items: 2781 — 2790


Feb 04, 2015

COSTS: Pre-Trial Expenses Exceed $5 Million in Aurora Death Penatly Case

Trial prepa­ra­tions in the death penal­ty pros­e­cu­tion of James Holmes in Colorado have already cost the state about $5.5 mil­lion, and the tri­al and like­ly appeals will add sig­nif­i­cant­ly more. Holmes is accused of the mass shoot­ing in a movie the­ater in Aurora. Most of the costs — $4.5 mil­lion — have come from the salaries of per­son­nel work­ing on the case, includ­ing the pros­e­cu­tors, defense attor­neys, the judge, inves­ti­ga­tors, and…

Read More

Feb 03, 2015

January’s Executions Underscore Core Death Penalty Problems

Even as exe­cu­tions have declined in the U.S., those being car­ried out often illus­trate seri­ous prob­lems that have plagued the death penal­ty for many years. Of the six exe­cu­tions January, two (in Florida and Oklahoma) involved a lethal injec­tion pro­to­col that is now under review by the U.S. Supreme Court. Georgia exe­cut­ed Andrew Brannan, a dec­o­rat­ed Vietnam War veteran with…

Read More

Feb 02, 2015

LAW REVIEWS: Disparities in Determinations of Intellectual Disability

A recent law review arti­cle report­ed wide vari­a­tions among states in exempt­ing defen­dants with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty from the death penal­ty. Professor John Blume (l.) of Cornell Law School, along with three co-authors, ana­lyzed claims filed under the Supreme Court’s deci­sion in Atkins v. Virginia (2002) against exe­cut­ing defen­dants with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty (for­mer­ly,​“men­tal retar­da­tion”). Overall, from 2002 through 2013, only…

Read More

Jan 30, 2015

EDITORIALS: Washington Post Calls for Transparency in Executions

In light of the three botched exe­cu­tions that took place in 2014, the Washington Post pub­lished an edi­to­r­i­al urg­ing states not to drop​“a veil of secre­cy over exe­cu­tions.” In par­tic­u­lar, the edi­to­r­i­al board oppos­es a pro­posed law in Virginia, which,​“would make prac­ti­cal­ly every­thing about exe­cu­tions in Virginia a state secret — even the build­ing in which they take place. ”​“It’s hard to see the com­pelling need for that…

Read More

Jan 29, 2015

NEW VOICES: Bi-Partisan Bill Introduced to Abolish Washington’s Death Penalty

Seattle’s Mayor Ed Murray, all 9 mem­bers of the Seattle City Council, and City Attorney Pete Holmes signed a let­ter in sup­port of a bi-par­ti­san bill to abol­ish the death penal­ty in Washington. Tim Burgess (l.), the President of the City Council, is a for­mer police offi­cer and detec­tive. The joint let­ter said:​“There is no cred­i­ble evi­dence show­ing that the death penal­ty deters homi­cide or makes our com­mu­ni­ties safer. Instead, pursuing…

Read More

Jan 28, 2015

STUDIES: Death Penalty Overwhelmingly Used for White-Victim Cases

According to a new study prin­ci­pal­ly authored by Prof. Frank Baumgartner of the University of North Carolina, the death penal­ty is far more like­ly to be used if the under­ly­ing mur­der vic­tim was white rather than black. The study exam­ined every U.S. exe­cu­tion from 1976 – 2013 and found,​“The sin­gle most reli­able pre­dic­tor of whether a defen­dant in the United States will be exe­cut­ed is the race of the vic­tim.… Capital pun­ish­ment is very rarely used where the victim is…

Read More

Jan 27, 2015

The Case of Warren Hill

The U.S. Supreme Court in Atkins v. Virginia (2002) banned the exe­cu­tion of indi­vid­u­als with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties (men­tal retar­da­tion), but allowed each state to set guide­lines for deter­min­ing whether an inmate has such a con­di­tion. In Georgia, cap­i­tal defen­dants are required to prove​“men­tal retar­da­tion” beyond a rea­son­able doubt. It is the only state in the coun­try that sets such a high bur­den of proof for such claims. Warren Hill had a strong…

Read More

Jan 26, 2015

Supreme Court Agrees to Review Oklahoma’s Lethal Injections

On January 23 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a chal­lenge to Oklahoma’s lethal injec­tion pro­ce­dures, par­tic­u­lar­ly its use of mida­zo­lam that was used in three botched exe­cu­tions in 2014. Four Oklahoma inmates asked the Court to review the state’s pro­ce­dures, but one of them, Charles Warner, was exe­cut­ed before the Court agreed to take the case. It is like­ly the oth­er three defen­dants will be grant­ed stays. When Warner…

Read More

Jan 23, 2015

UPCOMING EXECUTION: Texas Defendant with Low IQ Would Be Spared in Other States

UPDATE: (1/​27). Ladd was denied a stay by the TX Ct. of Crim. Appeals. Robert Ladd is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in Texas on January 29, despite hav­ing an IQ of 67, an indi­ca­tion of intel­lec­tial dis­abil­i­ty ren­der­ing him inel­i­gi­ble for exe­cu­tion. Howver, Texas courts reject­ed Ladd’s pre­vi­ous appeal because the state has a unique way of eval­u­at­ing intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. Courts in Texas often con­sid­er what is…

Read More