Publications & Testimony

Items: 5571 — 5580


Jan 14, 2005

9th Circuit Weighs Lethal Injection Challenge in California

Note: The Court of Appeals denied the chal­lenge to California’s lethal injec­tion process. Just one week before the sched­uled exe­cu­tion of California death row inmate Donald Beardslee, judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit are con­sid­er­ing a suit filed by the ACLU of California, Death Penalty Focus, and Beardslee’s defense attor­neys con­cern­ing the state’s use of a par­a­lyz­ing chem­i­cal called Pavulon in lethal injec­tions. Beardslee’s attor­neys said that Pavulon could…

Read More

Jan 13, 2005

New Resources Available on DPIC’s Web Site

Among the new resources avail­able on DPIC’s Web site are sum­maries of death penal­ty cas­es the U.S. Supreme Court has recent­ly agreed to hear, includ­ing the case involv­ing Mexican cit­i­zens on U.S. death rows. The upcom­ing cas­es sum­ma­rized include Medellin v. Dretke, Bell v. Thompson, and Mitchell v. Stumpf. In addi­tion to these sum­maries, DPIC has post­ed an overview of the new Innocence Protection Act, as well as an updat­ed ver­sion of it’s 4‑page Death Penalty Fact…

Read More

Jan 12, 2005

NEW RESOURCE: Executed on a Technicality” Scheduled for April Release

Executed on a Technicality: Lethal Injustice on America’s Death Row, by Professor David Dow, to be released in April 2005, is a behind-the-scenes look at the death penal­ty through the lens of an attor­ney who for­mer­ly sup­port­ed cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Dow, who teach­es at the University of Houston Law Center and found­ed the Texas Innocence Network, pro­vides case his­to­ries illus­trat­ing seri­ous flaws in the death penal­ty sys­tem. He uses these cas­es to guide read­ers through a web of coerced…

Read More

Jan 11, 2005

Arizona Case Exposes Prosecutorial Misconduct and Wrongful Convictions

In an exam­i­na­tion of the case against three men sen­tenced to death for a triple mur­der that occurred in Tucson’s El Grande Market, reporter Jeffrey Toobin in the New Yorker describes the inci­dents that led to the fall of the lead pros­e­cu­tor, Kenneth Peasley, for pre­sent­ing false evi­dence in the case. Only one of the co-defen­dants, Martin Soto-Fong, remains on Arizona’s death row. Of the oth­er two defen­dants, Christopher McCrimmon was acquit­ted at a re-tri­al in 1997, and Andre Minnett had his…

Read More

Jan 10, 2005

Indiana Governor Grants Clemency While Calling for Death Penalty Review

With just days remain­ing in his term, Indiana Governor Joe Kernan (pic­tured) has grant­ed clemen­cy to Michael Daniels, whose case under­scored the Governor’s con­cerns about the death penal­ty. I have now encoun­tered two cas­es where doubt about an offend­er’s per­son­al respon­si­bil­i­ty and the qual­i­ty of the legal process lead­ing to the cap­i­tal sen­tence has led me to grant clemen­cy. These instances should cause us to take a hard look at how Indiana admin­is­ters and reviews cap­i­tal sen­tences,”

Read More

Jan 07, 2005

RELIGIOUS VIEWS: Connecticut Archbishop Asks Parishoners to Protest the Death Penalty

As Connecticut pre­pares to car­ry out its first exe­cu­tion in over 40 years, Catholic Archbishop Henry J. Mansell of Hartford called on local parish­es to sign a Church peti­tion that calls for an end to cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. The death penal­ty offers the trag­ic illu­sion that we can defend life only by tak­ing life,” Mansell wrote in a let­ter that will be read dur­ing Masses on January 8 and 9. Other bish­ops in Connecticut are tak­ing sim­i­lar actions pri­or to the scheduled execution…

Read More

Jan 06, 2005

Washington Post Explores Gonzales Clemency Memos

The Washington Post has con­duct­ed fur­ther research into the clemen­cy mem­os pre­pared by U.S. Attorney General nom­i­nee Alberto R. Gonzales, who served as lead coun­sel to then-Governor George W. Bush in Texas. Gonzales craft­ed 62 mem­os regard­ing clemen­cy requests from Texas death row inmates, and sev­er­al Texas attor­neys have voiced their crit­i­cisms that the clemen­cy mem­os con­tained incom­plete and unfair sum­maries of evi­dence and mit­i­gat­ing cir­cum­stances. The mem­os, first reviewed in 2003 by…

Read More

Jan 05, 2005

NEW RESOURCES: Conversations With Extraordinary Women — Sister Helen Prejean

The book In Sweet Company: Conversations With Extraordinary Women About Living a Spiritual Life by Margaret Wolff fea­tures Sister Helen Prejean as one of 14 women whose spir­i­tu­al beliefs have served as the com­pass for their deci­sion-mak­ing and life’s work. Prejean, author of the Pulitzer Prize-nom­i­nat­ed book Dead Man Walking” and the new­ly released The Death of Innocents: An Eyewitness Account of Wrongful Executions,” has been an advi­sor to those on death row and an advocate against…

Read More

Jan 03, 2005

NEW RESOURCE: Sister Helen Prejean’s New Book: The Death of Innocents

In her new book, The Death of Innocents: An Eyewitness Account of Wrongful Executions, Sister Helen Prejean uses her per­son­al expe­ri­ences as a coun­selor to those on death row to explore the issue of inno­cence and the like­li­hood of exe­cut­ing a wrong­ly con­vict­ed per­son. The book also traces the his­tor­i­cal and legal under­pin­nings of the death penal­ty in the U.S. Prejean, who authored the #1 New York Times best­seller Dead Man Walking,” begins her new book by focus­ing on the…

Read More

Jan 03, 2005

NEW VOICES: Federal Judge Discusses His Concerns About the Death Penalty

In an inter­view with The New York Times, Judge Jed S. Rakoff (pic­tured) dis­cussed his rea­sons for find­ing the fed­er­al death penal­ty to be uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. Judge Rakoff ruled in April 2002 that the death penal­ty failed to secure due process because of the demon­strat­ed risk of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent per­son. He not­ed that his con­clu­sions on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment were based in part on his exten­sive review of cas­es includ­ed on the Death Penalty Information Center’s inno­cence list. He…

Read More