Capital Case Roundup — Death Penalty Court Decisions the Week of July 272020

NEWS (7/​31/​20) — Boston, MA: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has over­turned the death sen­tence imposed on Boston marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. In a 2 – 1 deci­sion, a pan­el of the court ruled that Tsarnaev’s death sen­tence vio­lat­ed the core promise of our crim­i­nal-jus­tice sys­tem … that even the very worst among us deserves to be fair­ly tried and law­ful­ly pun­ished.” The pan­el found that the tri­al judge’s fail­ure to ques­tion 9 of the 12 seat­ed jurors about what they had read and heard about the bomb­ing required that Tsarnaev’s death sen­tence be reversed.

The appeals court also over­turned three of Tsarnaev’s con­vic­tions for car­ry­ing a firearm dur­ing crimes of vio­lence, although that will have no impact on his mur­der con­vic­tions. It ordered the dis­trict court to enter judg­ments of acquit­tal on [those] charges, empan­el a new jury, and pre­side over a new tri­al strict­ly lim­it­ed to what penal­ty [Tsarnaev] should get on the death-eligible counts.”


NEWS (7/​31/​20) — California: A split pan­el of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has grant­ed a new tri­al to California death-row pris­on­er Marvin Walker, who has been on the state’s death row for 40 years. Judges Susan P. Graber and Ronald Lee Gilman court ruled that Santa Clara County pros­e­cu­tors had imper­mis­si­bly exer­cised their dis­cre­tionary jury strikes on the basis of race to remove all three Black poten­tial jurors from ser­vice in the case. 

In dis­sent, Senior Circuit Judge J. Clifford Wallace wrote he would have upheld Walker’s con­vic­tion because the California Supreme Court was not objec­tive­ly unrea­son­able’ in con­clud­ing that sub­stan­tial evi­dence sup­port­ed the tri­al court’s deter­mi­na­tion that the pros­e­cu­tor exer­cised his peremp­to­ry chal­lenges for race-neutral reasons.”


NEWS (7/​30/​20) — California: The California Supreme Court grant­ed a new tri­al to Paul Henderson, sen­tenced to death in Riverside County in May 2001. The direct appeal process took the California courts 19 years to com­plete. The court ruled that Henderson’s con­vic­tion was taint­ed by state­ments obtained as a result of police ques­tion­ing after he had invoked his right to coun­sel, in vio­la­tion of the Fifth Amendment. 


NEWS (7/​28/​20) — North Carolina: A New Hanover County post-con­vic­tion court has grant­ed a new tri­al to North Carolina death-row pris­on­er Keith Wiley, sen­tenced to death in May 1999. Judge R. Kent Harrell ruled that the tri­al court improp­er­ly refused to allow defense coun­sel to strike an impan­eled juror after the tri­al start­ed when a juror who had pre­vi­ous­ly denied know­ing any­one asso­ci­at­ed with the case lat­er indi­cat­ed that he knew the vic­tim and that his sis­ter and moth­er knew the victim’s moth­er through the family’s busi­ness. The court also ruled that Wiley’s appeal lawyer was inef­fec­tive when she failed to raise the issue dur­ing his direct appeal.