On April 14, 2021, com­mit­tees in both cham­bers of the Tennessee leg­is­la­ture vot­ed to advance bills that would cre­ate a legal mech­a­nism for death-row pris­on­ers to chal­lenge their death sen­tences on the grounds that they have intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. The leg­is­la­tion would close a loop­hole in Tennessee law that denies pris­on­ers whose con­vic­tions became final before the U.S. Supreme Court barred the exe­cu­tion of indi­vid­u­als with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty any oppor­tu­ni­ty to present their claims of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty to the Tennessee courts. House Bill 1026 passed the Criminal Justice Committee by a voice vote, and Senate Bill 1349 passed the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 7 – 1.

The Tennessee Black Caucus of State Legislators intro­duced leg­is­la­tion to cre­ate a pro­ce­dure to lit­i­gate intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty in response to the case of Pervis Payne, who faced exe­cu­tion despite strong evi­dence that he has intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty and may be inno­cent. Those bills, which died in com­mit­tee with­out a vote, and the bills that were approved by the com­mit­tees would have estab­lished the same pro­ce­dures to present a prisoner’s claim of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty but dif­fered in their def­i­n­i­tion of the dis­or­der. HB 2016 and SB 1349 con­form the def­i­n­i­tion of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty to the diag­nos­tic cri­te­ria con­tained in the cur­rent edi­tion of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association.”