DPI Podcast: Discussions With DPIC
Does Capital Punishment Deter Murder? Exploring murder rates, killings of police officers, and the death penalty
DPI Page: Murder Rates
View DPI's information about state-by-state murder rates. State and regional murder statistics show no correlation between use of the death penalty and reduced crime.
Overview
Deterrence is probably the most commonly expressed rationale for the death penalty. The essence of the theory is that the threat of being executed in the future will be sufficient to cause a significant number of people to refrain from committing a heinous crime they had otherwise planned. Deterrence is not principally concerned with the prevention of further killing by an already convicted death-penalty defendant. That falls under the topic of incapacitation.
Deterrence should not be considered in a vacuum. The critical question is not whether potential criminals will be dissuaded from killing because they would face the death penalty rather than no punishment at all. Other punishments such as life without parole might provide equal deterrence at far less costs and without the attendant risk of executing an innocent person. Whether the death penalty is a proven method of lowering the murder rate has been subjected to many studies over many decades.
It is not enough to compare jurisdictions with the death penalty to those without unless the study controls for the many other variables that could affect the murder rate. For example, lower unemployment rates correlate with lower crime rates. More police involvement in the local community seems to reduce crime. The death penalty affects only a tiny percentage of even those who commit murder. Its effect is very difficult to pinpoint, and the National Academy of Sciences has concluded that past studies have neither proven nor disproven a deterrent effect.
At Issue
If the death penalty is not a proven deterrent to murder, is it worth the excessive costs, risks of error, uncertainty of completion, and other problems that are inherent to its practice? On the political level, the deterrent value of the death penalty is often taken for granted without a careful examination of the research or a consideration of less risky alternatives. This is especially relevant given that death penalty use has been declining dramatically. Most states are not carrying out any executions in a given year.
What DPI Offers
DPI has collected many of the deterrent studies that have been conducted in the modern era and has summarized their results. It also provides some of the raw data on which such studies rely, such as the murder rate for each state in each year in the modern era, along with the number of executions and death sentences for each state in the same periods.
News & Developments
News
Mar 04, 2026
What to Know: Deterrence and the Death Penalty
DPI’s“What to Know” series examines capital punishment from multiple angles, one topic at a time. Each installment provides essential facts and data on specific aspects of the death penalty. Why it matters: Deterrence is among the most commonly cited justifications for the death penalty, yet decades of research have failed to produce credible evidence that use of the death penalty has an impact on homicide rates. ### Key Facts: — 88% of the nation’s…
Read MoreNews
Dec 04, 2025
When Conservative Principles Meet 48 Years of Injustice
Glynn Simmons keeps a copy of his death warrant, signed by the Oklahoma governor 50 years ago, ordering his execution in the electric chair. He was 22 years old at the time, convicted of a murder he did not commit. Forty-eight years later, after becoming the longest-incarcerated wrongfully convicted person in U.S. history, Mr. Simmons’ story has become central to a growing conservative movement questioning capital punishment — one that Nan Tolson is…
Read MoreNews
Oct 30, 2025
Low Death Sentencing, Lack of Deterrence, and High Costs Raise Questions Over Capital Punishment in Indiana
Indiana’s seemingly paradoxical resumption of executions, with three over the last year, is drawing scrutiny from many corners of the state. Governor Mike Braun, legislators from both political parties, public defenders and even prosecutors have raised questions about the costs of prosecuting capital cases and obtaining drugs for executions; the failure of capital punishment to deter crime; and the increasing reluctance of Indiana juries to sentence…
Read MoreNews
Sep 12, 2025
30 Years Ago, South Africa Abolished the Death Penalty to Prioritize Life and Dignity
30 years ago, the newly formed Constitutional Court of South Africa issued a landmark decision abolishing the death penalty and prioritizing the core constitutional rights to life and dignity above all else. Published on June 6, 1995, the Court’s opinion in S v. Makwanyane drew on international legal frameworks, as well as death penalty debates in other countries, such as the United States. The Court weighed inherent issues in the application of the death…
Read MoreNews
Aug 25, 2025
State Spotlight: California Death Row Shrinks Sharply in 2024, Driven by the Resentencing of At Least 45 People to Life Sentences or Less
This week we are featuring some articles from the first part of 2025 that we think are worth another look. We’ll be back with new articles next week. This article originally ran on February 11, 2025. When California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a moratorium on executions in 2019, he said that the state’s“death penalty system has been, by all measures, a failure.” He explained that the death penalty“has discriminated against defendants who are mentally ill,…
Read More
