The International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) recent­ly pub­lished a report on the use of the death penal­ty for drug crimes around the world. The report dis­tin­guish­es between coun­tries that have leg­is­la­tion allow­ing a death sen­tence for drug offens­es and those that actu­al­ly apply it in prac­tice. According to the report, 32 juris­dic­tions retain the death penal­ty for drug offens­es (out of the 58 coun­tries that have the death penal­ty for any offense), at least 12 of which were known to have car­ried out an exe­cu­tion for such offens­es in the last three years. These coun­tries include China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Viet Nam. Additionally, 13 of the 32 juris­dic­tions use a manda­to­ry death penal­ty for cer­tain cat­e­gories of drug offens­es. Five of the 32 juris­dic­tions are abo­li­tion­ist in prac­tice, i.e. they have not car­ried out an exe­cu­tion in many years. The United States, whose fed­er­al law allows the death penal­ty for cer­tain drug offens­es even where a mur­der has not occurred, is con­sid­ered a juris­dic­tion with only sym­bol­ic com­mit­ment to such a prac­tice since this part of the fed­er­al death penal­ty law has not been applied to any defen­dant. Read full report here.

(P. Gallahue and R. Lines, The Death Penalty for Drug Offences: Global Overview 2010,” International Harm Reduction Association, April 2010). Posted June 9, 2010. The IHRA is a non-gov­ern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tion pro­mot­ing poli­cies to reduce harm from drugs. Click here to learn more about the International Death Penalty or for more Resources on the Death Penalty.

Citation Guide