Policy

International

More than 70% of the world’s countries have abolished capital punishment in law or practice. The U.S. is an outlier among its close allies in its continued use of the death penalty.

DPI Page: Foreign Nationals on United States' Death Rows

DPI Page: Foreign Nationals on United States’ Death Rows

Some of those on death row in the U.S. are cit­i­zens of oth­er coun­tries, rais­ing human rights issues and issues of U.S. com­pli­ance with inter­na­tion­al treaties.

Cornell Law School: International Death Penalty Database

Cornell Law School: International Death Penalty Database

Maintained by the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide (Cornell Law School)

Overview

More than 70% of the world’s coun­tries have abol­ished cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in law or prac­tice. However, the death penal­ty con­tin­ues to exist in many parts of the world, espe­cial­ly in coun­tries with large pop­u­la­tions and those with author­i­tar­i­an rule. In recent decades, there has been a clear trend away from cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, as many coun­tries have either abol­ished the death penal­ty or dis­con­tin­ued its use. The U.S. remains an out­lier among its close allies and oth­er democ­ra­cies in its con­tin­ued appli­ca­tion of the death penalty.

While inter­na­tion­al law does not pro­hib­it the death penal­ty, most coun­tries con­sid­er it a vio­la­tion of human rights. The use of the death penal­ty world­wide is rel­e­vant in eval­u­at­ing U.S. stan­dards of decen­cy and what should be con­sid­ered cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment under the Eighth Amendment. Some Justices of the Supreme Court have referred to inter­na­tion­al law as fur­ther affir­ma­tion of their own con­clu­sions about the death penal­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly as it may apply to spe­cif­ic class­es of defen­dants such as juvenile offenders.

At Issue

There are a num­ber of dis­agree­ments that may arise between coun­tries that impose the death penal­ty and those that do not. Countries with­out the death penal­ty are par­tic­u­lar­ly con­cerned when one of their cit­i­zens faces exe­cu­tion in the U.S. Some coun­tries refuse to extra­dite indi­vid­u­als to the U.S., or even to pro­vide incrim­i­nat­ing evi­dence, if the defen­dant could face the death penal­ty. In addi­tion, many coun­tries and inter­na­tion­al bod­ies con­sid­er the death penal­ty to be a human rights issue and var­i­ous U.S. death-penal­ty prac­tices have been crit­i­cized as vio­lat­ing U.S. treaty oblig­a­tions and inter­na­tion­al human rights law. The con­cern for human rights around the world has always been impor­tant in U.S. diplo­ma­cy, but the U.S. is often chal­lenged because of its use of the death penal­ty and the pro­tec­tion that affords to oth­er coun­tries that use it in par­tic­u­lar­ly abusive ways.

What DPI Offers

International research on the use of the death penal­ty owes par­tic­u­lar grat­i­tude to Amnesty International, which has reg­u­lar­ly mon­i­tored and report­ed on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment around the world. DPI pass­es this infor­ma­tion on with attri­bu­tion through its web­site and makes an effort to high­light those areas where inter­na­tion­al norms and prac­tices reflect on the death penal­ty in the U.S. DPI has issued one report focus­ing on this top­ic and reg­u­lar­ly high­lights rel­e­vant research and devel­op­ments that occur around the world.

News & Developments


News

Jul 14, 2026

Nearly 71 Years After Her Execution, Ruth Ellis, the Last Woman Executed in the UK, Receives Conditional Pardon from King Charles

On July 8, 2026, King Charles, fol­low­ing the advice of Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, grant­ed a posthu­mous con­di­tion­al par­don to Ruth Ellis, con­vert­ing her death sen­tence to a term of life impris­on­ment. Ms. Ellis was orig­i­nal­ly sen­tenced to death for the April 10, 1955 mur­der of her roman­tic part­ner David Blakely, and she was the last woman hanged in the United Kingdom on July 13, 1955. A press release from the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Justice explains that this…

Read More

News

Jul 01, 2026

Death Penalty Information Center Brings Expertise to Global Stage at 9th World Congress Against the Death Penalty

As glob­al experts gath­er in Paris this week to exam­ine the state of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment world­wide, the Death Penalty Information Center will be among them, as a source of author­i­ta­tive data and research on how the death penal­ty is oper­at­ing in the United States. The 9th World Congress Against the Death Penalty, orga­nized by ECPM (Ensemble Contre la Peine de Mort) and host­ed by the French Republic, runs June 30 through July 2 at the Maison de la Radio et de la Musique in…

Read More

News

Jun 24, 2026

Jordan Resumes Executions After 9‑Year Hiatus with the Hanging of 6 Men

On June 21, 2026, Jordan per­formed its first exe­cu­tions since March 2017, hang­ing six men con­vict­ed of ter­ror­ism-relat­ed or drug-traf­­fick­­ing charges on a sin­gle day, all accused of direct­ly or indi­rect­ly caus­ing the deaths of law enforce­ment or secu­ri­ty forces. On the same day the exe­cu­tions were car­ried out, Prime Minister Jafar Hassan announced dur­ing a cab­i­net ses­sion that Parliament intends to expand cap­i­tal crimes to include​“major drug traffickers and…

Read More

News

Jun 12, 2026

Amnesty International Global Report (2025): 78% Increase in Executions Globally Mark Highest Number Since 1981

According to Amnesty International’s annu­al death penal­ty report, 17 coun­tries car­ried out a total of at least 2,707 exe­cu­tions in 2025. Although the low num­ber of exe­cut­ing coun­tries was con­sis­tent with the annu­al total of 20 exe­cut­ing coun­tries or few­er since 2018, the num­ber of exe­cu­tions marked the high­est glob­al total since 1981. The 78% increase in known exe­cu­tions from 2024 to 2025 was pri­mar­i­ly dri­ven by Iran, which account­ed for 80% of the global total…

Read More

News

May 27, 2026

Article of Interest: Academic Chapter Examines the Use of Neuroscience Evidence in Brain Injury Cases Across 6 Countries

In her chap­ter of the new­ly pub­lished book Neuroscience in Criminal Justice Systems: The Positive Impact of Neurojustice, Fordham Law Professor and Founding Director of the Neuroscience and Law Center Deborah Denno explores the use of neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence in crim­i­nal cas­es involv­ing brain injury, both from exter­nal caus­es (e.g., car acci­dents or gun­shot wounds) and inter­nal caus­es (e.g., demen­tia or alco­hol-induced brain dam­age). The chap­ter titled,​“The…

Read More