Table of Contents

The Death Penalty in 2024

Introduction

The death penalty is no longer an American story. In 2024, what the death penalty means to you increasingly depends on where you live, how old you are, and who you elect in your community. 

Introduction

Death Row Population By State

Jurisdiction 2024 2023
California 613 647
Florida 289 298
Texas 177 185
Alabama 165 167
North Carolina 138 139
Arizona 116 115
Ohio 116 120
Pennsylvania 109 115
Louisiana 63 64
Nevada 58 61
Tennessee 45 45
U.S. Federal Gov’t 40 44
Georgia 37 40
Mississippi 37 36
Oklahoma 33 37
South Carolina 33 36
Arkansas 27 27
Kentucky 25 26
Missouri 11 13
Nebraska 11 11
Kansas 9 9
Idaho 9 8
Indiana 8 8
Utah 6 7
U.S. Military 4 4
Montana 2 2
New Hampshire† 1 1
South Dakota 1 1
Oregon 0 0
Wyoming 0 0
Total 2,180 2,262
  • Data from NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund for October 1 of the year shown.
  • Persons with death sen­tences in mul­ti­ple states are only includ­ed once in the total.

    New Hampshire prospec­tive­ly abol­ished the death penal­ty May 302019.

In most U.S. states, the death penal­ty is a rel­ic of anoth­er era. If you are age 43 or younger, your gen­er­a­tion increas­ing­ly sup­ports alter­na­tives to the death penal­ty. If you live in one of 34 states, your state either has no death penal­ty, or the last exe­cu­tion was more than ten years ago. Just four states — Alabama, Texas, Missouri, and Oklahoma — were respon­si­ble for 76% of exe­cu­tions this year. 

The twen­­ty-six new death sen­tences in 2024 were scat­tered among ten states, but the only states which per­mit non-unan­i­­mous sen­tenc­ing were respon­si­ble for 42% of them: Florida (7) and Alabama (4). Nine of these eleven death sen­tences were non-unanimous.

Nine states exe­cut­ed 25 peo­ple this year, sim­i­lar to 2023 (24 exe­cu­tions). But if you live in one of the oth­er 41 states, the death penal­ty may not even reg­is­ter as a con­cern. This fact did not go unno­ticed by politi­cians run­ning for nation­al office. In this impor­tant pres­i­den­tial elec­tion year, the death penal­ty was notice­ably absent from both major polit­i­cal par­ty plat­forms and wasn’t an issue in the pres­i­den­tial cam­paign. Use of the death penal­ty also failed to rank as a pri­or­i­ty issue among like­ly vot­ers in national polls. 

Local politi­cians fre­quent­ly drove out­comes in death penal­ty cas­es this year. Alabama’s elect­ed offi­cials chose to use nitro­gen gas to suf­fo­cate three pris­on­ers despite wide­spread con­dem­na­tion of a method many experts called tor­ture. In Missouri, state and local politi­cians fought about the fate of Marcellus Williams, whose exe­cu­tion occurred despite the oppo­si­tion of more than one mil­lion peo­ple. And in Texas and Oklahoma, there was rare pub­lic sup­port from elect­ed offi­cials who helped focus atten­tion on the fail­ure of state laws and pro­ce­dures to ade­quate­ly pro­tect pris­on­ers with com­pelling evi­dence of inno­cence, like Robert Roberson and Richard Glossip. Looking ahead, the pow­er of local politi­cians is like­ly to be deter­mi­na­tive so long as the United State Supreme Court refus­es to inter­vene in state death penalty cases.