• Indiana Bars Execution of Juvenile Offenders - Indiana became the 16th state to for­bid the death penal­ty for those who were under 18 years-of-age at the time of their crime. Gov. Frank O’Bannon signed SB 426 on March 26. The law also requires judges to fol­low juries’ unan­i­mous sen­tenc­ing rec­om­men­da­tions. (Associated Press, 3/​26/​02.) Federal death penal­ty law sim­i­lar­ly excludes juve­nile offend­ers. An addi­tion­al 5 states restrict the death penal­ty to those who are at least 17 at the time of their crime
  • A tri­al court judge in Indianapolis ruled that the state’s death penal­ty statute was uncon­sti­tu­tion­al in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court deci­sion. Judge Grant W. Hawkins held that the state’s statute effec­tive­ly denied death row inmate Charles Barker his right to tri­al by jury, and dis­missed the death penal­ty as a sen­tenc­ing option at Barker’s upcom­ing resen­tenc­ing hear­ing. Hawkins based his rul­ing on Apprendi v. New Jersey (530 U.S. 466 (2000)). In Apprendi, the U.S. Supreme Court held that any fact, oth­er than a pri­or con­vic­tion, that increas­es the penal­ty for a crime beyond the pre­scribed statu­to­ry max­i­mum must be sub­mit­ted to a jury and proved beyond a rea­son­able doubt. In Indiana, the jury makes an unbind­ing rec­om­men­da­tion to the judge, who sen­tences the defen­dant. Judge Hawkins ruled that the Indiana statute vio­lates Apprendi because it is pos­si­ble that a judge could sen­tence an inmate to death even though a jury has failed to find, beyond a rea­son­able doubt, the exis­tence of an aggra­vat­ing fac­tor. (Order on Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Death Penalty, September 102001