Professor Samuel R. Gross (pic­tured) of the University of Michigan Law School has pub­lished an arti­cle in the Iowa Law Review exam­in­ing the his­tor­i­cal impor­tance of a series of stud­ies show­ing racial bias in the death penal­ty. The issue of race was brought to a head by the Supreme Court’s con­sid­er­a­tion of McCleskey v. Kemp in 1987. McCleskey focused on a sta­tis­ti­cal exam­i­na­tion of Georgia death sen­tences con­duct­ed by David Baldus. Though the study found com­pelling and sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant evi­dence of racial bias in sen­tenc­ing, the Court held (5 – 4) this evi­dence insuf­fi­cient to over­turn Warren McCleskey’s death sen­tence. Prof. Gross argues that, despite the Court’s neg­a­tive hold­ing, the Justices were con­vinced that racial bias exist­ed in the death penal­ty. Even on the Supreme Court that sent Warren McCleskey to his death, even among the Justices who most strong­ly sup­port the death penal­ty, nobody has tried to deny that racial sym­pa­thies and antipathies’ decide who lives and who dies. No Justice said oth­er­wise in McCleskey and none have denied it since.” Gross con­cludes that Baldus’ lega­cy was in forc[ing] reluc­tant judges to face up to facts they would have pre­ferred to ignore.” Prof. Baldus of the University of Iowa died in 2011.

(S. Gross, Baldus and the Legacy of McCleskey v. Kemp,” 97 Iowa Law Review 1906 (2012); DPIC post­ed Jan. 24, 2013). See Studies, Race, and Law Reviews.

Citation Guide