Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Mar 052025

Public Officials and Advocates Respond to SCOTUS’ Decision to Overturn Richard Glossip’s Conviction

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sion to vacate Richard Glossip’s 2004 death sen­tence, pub­lic offi­cials and advo­cates have expressed strong reac­tions. Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond acknowl­edged the sig­nif­i­cance of the rul­ing, stat­ing,​“Our jus­tice sys­tem is great­ly dimin­ished when an indi­vid­ual is con­vict­ed with­out a fair tri­al, but today we can cel­e­brate that a great injus­tice has been swept away.” While main­tain­ing his belief that Mr.

Read More

News 

Mar 032025

Alabama Governor Grants Clemency to Robin Rocky’ Myers, Sparing Him from Execution

On February 28, 2025, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey com­mut­ed the death sen­tence of Robin​‘Rocky’ Dion Myers to Life Without Parole (LWOP). Myers was con­vict­ed in the 1991 mur­der of Ludie Mae Tucker in Decatur, Alabama. His jury rec­om­mend­ed that he be sen­tenced to LWOP, but the judge in his case over­rode the jury’s rec­om­men­da­tion and hand­ed down a death sen­tence. The prac­tice of judi­cial over­ride was abol­ished in Alabama in 2017. In her state­ment, Gov. Ivey repeated her…

Read More

News 

Feb 272025

New Podcast: The Past, Present, and Future of the California Racial Justice Act

In the February 2025 episode of 12:01: The Death Penalty in Context, DPI Managing Director Anne Holsinger speaks with three experts on California’s Racial Justice Act (RJA). Natasha Minsker, an attor­ney and con­sul­tant, for­mer­ly of the ACLU, speaks on the his­to­ry of the RJA and the impe­tus for its pas­sage. Genevie Gold, research and writ­ing fel­low at the Office of the State Public Defender (OSPD), describes the process that an RJA claim fol­lows through the legal sys­tem, and…

Read More

News 

Feb 262025

Robert Roberson Once Again Asks Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to Consider New Evidence Supporting His Actual Innocence and Grant Him Relief

On February 19, 2025, in new fil­ings, Robert Roberson returned to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) with a request for relief, pre­sent­ing sub­stan­tial new evi­dence that sup­ports his claim of actu­al inno­cence. Mr. Roberson’s lat­est habeas appli­ca­tion incor­po­rates new expert opin­ions and ref­er­ences sci­en­tif­ic advance­ments that have emerged since October 2024, when the CCA acknowl­edged in a sim­i­lar case that the sci­en­tif­ic foun­da­tion for​“Shaken Baby”…

Read More

News 

Feb 242025

Article of Interest: Cato Institute Fellow Critiques Medical Ethics Double Standard Around Executions

In a February blog post, Cato Institute Senior Fellow Jeffrey A. Singer crit­i­cizes the use of med­ical­ized lethal injec­tion, high­light­ing the dou­ble stan­dard under which pro­ce­dures that med­ical pro­fes­sion­als are eth­i­cal­ly barred from car­ry­ing out are not only allowed, but required, of law enforce­ment per­son­nel.​“A doc­tor who inten­tion­al­ly per­forms cru­el and med­ical­ly unjus­ti­fi­able pro­ce­dures that cause pain and suf­fer­ing could face crim­i­nal charges. If…

Read More

News 

Feb 192025

Alabama House Joins Florida and Tennessee to Advance Unconstitutional Expansion of Death Penalty that Advocates Say Would Harm Children

On February 11, 2025, the Alabama House of Representatives vot­ed 86 – 5, with nine absten­tions, in favor of a bill that would expand the use of the death penal­ty to those con­vict­ed of the rape or sodomy of a child under the age of 12. This bill will be head­ed to the state Senate. If passed, the law would direct­ly vio­late United States Supreme Court prece­dent estab­lished in Kennedy V. Louisiana (2008)which found the death penal­ty an uncon­sti­tu­tion­al form of…

Read More

News 

Feb 132025

Montana House Legislators Defeat Bill that Would Have Broadened Lethal Injection Methods

On January 30, 2025, the Montana House of Representatives reject­ed by a vote of 51 – 49 House Bill 205 (HB 205), which would have mod­i­fied the state’s lethal injec­tion pro­to­col. The bill sought to remove lan­guage in the Montana lethal injec­tion pro­to­col that requires the use of an​“ultra-fast act­ing” drug in com­bi­na­tion with a​“chem­i­cal par­a­lyt­ic agent” and replace it with broad­er ter­mi­nol­o­gy that would allow for the use of any​“sub­stance or sub­stances in a lethal…

Read More

News 

Feb 042025

Florida Legislature Passes Unconstitutional Bill that Mandates the Death Penalty for Unauthorized Aliens”

On January 28, 2025, the Florida Legislature passed an immi­gra­tion bill that includes a pro­vi­sion man­dat­ing the auto­mat­ic impo­si­tion of the death penal­ty for​“unau­tho­rized aliens” con­vict­ed of a cap­i­tal offense, despite long­stand­ing U.S. prece­dent and inter­na­tion­al law pro­hibit­ing manda­to­ry death sen­tences. The bill was intro­duced dur­ing a short spe­cial leg­isla­tive ses­sion called by Governor Ron DeSantis (pic­tured), leav­ing lit­tle to no time for public…

Read More

News 

Feb 032025

Fired Federal Judge Raises Serious Concerns About Arizona’s Lethal Injection Protocol

Retired fed­er­al mag­is­trate Judge David Duncan, who was hired and then abrupt­ly fired by Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs to review the state’s exe­cu­tion pro­to­col, con­tin­ues to raise sig­nif­i­cant con­cerns about the state’s lethal injec­tion pro­to­col. In an inter­view with ABC15, Judge Duncan high­light­ed issues with the chain of com­mand for lethal injec­tion drugs, trans­paren­cy, and the state doc­u­men­ta­tion process.​“It’s shock­ing irony that one of my tasks was…

Read More

News 

Jan 302025

Arizona’s Hourly Compensation for Post-Conviction Capital Counsel Found Inadequate for Certification by Outgoing Attorney General Merrick Garland

In one of his final acts before leav­ing office, out­go­ing Attorney General Merrick Garland denied a long­stand­ing request by Arizona state offi­cials for the state to be​“cer­ti­fied” so it could take advan­tage of cer­tain pro­ce­dur­al ben­e­fits in fed­er­al habeas review of cap­i­tal cas­es. These changes are avail­able only when a state sat­is­fies cer­tain require­ments, and ben­e­fit state actors by impos­ing greater restric­tions on a prisoner’s abil­i­ty to raise claims and by…

Read More