Policy Issues

Sentencing Alternatives

Alternative sentences avoid some of the key problems with capital punishment, including the high cost of the death penalty and the risk of executing an innocent person.

DPIC Podcast: Discussions With DPIC

DPIC Podcast: Discussions With DPIC

Missouri Attorney Discusses Winning Life Sentence in Federal Prison-Killing Case

Overview 

Discussion around the death penal­ty has increas­ing­ly shift­ed away from a moral debate to a com­par­i­son of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and its viable alter­na­tives. The choice today for pros­e­cu­tors, jurors, leg­is­la­tors, and the courts is usu­al­ly between the death penal­ty and a sen­tence of life with­out parole (LWOP). Some vic­tims’ fam­i­lies pre­fer LWOP to the uncer­tain­ty of secur­ing a death sen­tence and the like­li­hood of many years of appeals before an exe­cu­tion would occur. Many pros­e­cu­tors have also con­clud­ed that the high costs asso­ci­at­ed with cap­i­tal cas­es are unaf­ford­able, espe­cial­ly with the high rate of rever­sals. As the avail­abil­i­ty and use of LWOP has expand­ed, the num­ber of death sen­tences has declined dramatically.

States have also looked beyond pun­ish­ment to alter­na­tive ways of reduc­ing vio­lent crime, includ­ing com­mu­ni­ty polic­ing, the intro­duc­tion of crime-fight­ing tech­nol­o­gy, and restora­tive jus­tice efforts. In some juris­dic­tions, resources not expend­ed in seek­ing the death penal­ty could be used to sup­port these initiatives.

At Issue 

Many pros­e­cu­tors are reluc­tant to elim­i­nate the death penal­ty as an option because they see it as a bar­gain­ing chip that results in cap­i­tal defen­dants plead­ing guilty in exchange for tak­ing the death penal­ty off the table. Commentators have not­ed that the use of the death penal­ty as a threat is con­cern­ing on both eth­i­cal and con­sti­tu­tion­al grounds.

Some oppo­nents of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment also char­ac­ter­ize the use of life-with­out-parole sen­tences as just anoth­er kind of death sen­tence and note its expand­ed use even in non-cap­i­tal cas­es con­tributed to the cur­rent prob­lem of mass incar­cer­a­tion. According to a 2021 report from The Sentencing Project, the num­ber of peo­ple serv­ing sen­tences of life with­out parole has increased 66% since 2003; one out of sev­en incar­cer­at­ed per­sons is serv­ing a sen­tence of either LWOP, life with parole, or a sen­tence of 50 years or more. Aligning with larg­er racial dis­par­i­ties in prison sen­tenc­ing, there is a dis­pro­por­tion­ate num­ber of Black peo­ple serv­ing LWOP sen­tences, accord­ing to 2020 data from the Prison Policy Initiative. The U.S. con­tin­ues to have the world’s high­est prison pop­u­la­tion per capi­ta, with 629 peo­ple per 100,000 in prison, accord­ing to Penal Reform International’s 2022 Global Prison Trends. On the oth­er hand, LWOP has been avail­able as an option in every state that has abol­ished the death penal­ty in recent years, and some defense lawyers acknowl­edge that with­out LWOP many of their clients would be in dan­ger of receiv­ing death sentences.

What DPIC Offers 

Recent opin­ion polls note the public’s view of using the death penal­ty vs. alter­na­tive sen­tences, and DPIC has col­lect­ed the results of those sur­veys. DPIC also pro­vides infor­ma­tion on state leg­isla­tive efforts to adopt LWOP and exam­ines when and how LWOP results in cas­es where juries can­not agree on a death sentence.

News & Developments


News

Oct 04, 2024

A Chance at Life, Withdrawn: When Politics Interferes with Plea Deals

American pros­e­cu­tors have immense pow­er and rel­a­tive­ly unchecked dis­cre­tion in cap­i­tal cas­es. But in sev­er­al recent cas­es, death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers reached agree­ments with pros­e­cu­tors that would have saved them from exe­cu­tion, only to learn that anoth­er offi­cial had inter­fered to block the agree­ment. Critics have argued that these deci­sions sow pub­lic dis­trust in the legal process and raise con­cerns that gov­ern­ment offi­cials may be exploit­ing death penal­ty cas­es for political…

Read More

News

Aug 30, 2024

Articles of Interest: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Editorial Board Argues that Death Penalty Will Not Bring Justice for Leon Katz

In a new edi­to­r­i­al, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette argues that the death penal­ty is nev­er the jus­tice that is called for” and achieves noth­ing of val­ue except the sat­is­fac­tion of vengeance.” The Post-Gazette describes the death of 6‑week-old Leon Katz in June as an almost unfath­omable” crime and a vio­la­tion of pri­mor­dial inno­cence” — but argues that Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.’s deci­sion to seek the death penal­ty against Nicole Virzi, Leon’s alleged…

Read More

News

Jan 03, 2024

Overwhelming Percentage of Florida’s Hurst Resentencing Hearings End in Life Sentences

According to new research by the Death Penalty Information Center, 82% of Florida death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers who com­plet­ed new sen­tenc­ing pro­ceed­ings under Hurst v. Florida (2016) have been resen­tenced to life in prison with­out parole. Hurst found Florida’s death penal­ty scheme uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, and the Florida Supreme Court sub­se­quent­ly held that new death sen­tences must be unan­i­mous, neces­si­tat­ing new sen­tenc­ing hear­ings. Of the 157 cas­es DPIC pre­vi­ous­ly identified as…

Read More

News

Nov 27, 2023

Florida Judge Imposes Life Sentence for Joshua McClellan, Overriding Non-Unanimous Jury Recommendation for Death

On November 20, Florida Circuit Judge Heidi Davis sen­tenced Joshua McClellan to life in prison after a non-unan­i­mous jury returned a rec­om­men­da­tion of death in September by a 10 – 2 vote. Judge Davis not­ed the mit­i­ga­tion evi­dence pre­sent­ed by Mr. McClellan’s defense, includ­ing men­tal health eval­u­a­tions and tes­ti­mo­ny regard­ing his trau­mat­ic upbring­ing, as an expla­na­tion for her deci­sion. Mr. McClellan was one of the first defen­dants to receive a non-unan­i­mous death rec­om­men­da­tion under a new law…

Read More

News

Aug 21, 2023

Brain Scans of Tennessee Man Who Admits to Killing Eight Convince Prosecutors to Drop Death Penalty

On August 16, 2023, Michael Cummins, who was fac­ing the death penal­ty for the 2019 killings of eight indi­vid­u­als in rur­al Tennessee, pled guilty to all eight counts of first-degree mur­der in exchange for life in prison with­out parole. Sumner County District Attorney Ray Whitley told the press that he had reversed his deci­sion to seek a death sen­tence and agreed to the plea based on new evi­dence regard­ing Mr. Cummins’ men­tal health. That evi­dence includ­ed Mr. Cummins’ brain scans, which showed…

Read More