Policy Issues

Human Rights

The death penalty and its application are topics of significant concern among international human rights organizations and are the subject of numerous international treaties and agreements.

Webinar Series on Human Rights and the U.S. Death Penalty

Webinar Series on Human Rights and the U.S. Death Penalty

In 2022, DPIC hosted a series of webinars on topics related to human rights in the U.S. death penalty

DPIC Analysis—At Least 1,300 Prisoners are on U.S. Death Rows in Violation of U.S. Human Rights Obligations

DPIC Analysis — At Least 1,300 Prisoners are on U.S. Death Rows in Violation of U.S. Human Rights Obligations

Half of U.S. death row has been imprisoned 20 years or more, in violation of international human rights agreements

Overview

International human rights treaties declare that “Every human being has the inherent right to life.” This right, set forth in Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted by the United Nations (UN) in 1966, further provides that “no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.” Article 6 further states that “In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime.” The ICCPR prohibits the use of the death penalty “for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age” and bars the execution of women while they are pregnant. Article 7 of the ICCPR declares that “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

When the United States ratified the ICCPR in 1992, it did so with specific reservations relating to the use of the death penalty. First, it “reserve[d] the right, subject to its Constitutional constraints, to impose capital punishment on any person (other than a pregnant woman) duly convicted under existing or future laws permitting the imposition of capital punishment, including such punishment for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age.” Second, it stated that “the United States considers itself bound by article 7 to the extent that `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ means the cruel and unusual treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.” It further declared that the treaty’s provisions “are not self-executing,” meaning that they are not enforceable under U.S. domestic law without enabling legislation by Congress.

The ICCPR establishes the end of the death penalty as a human rights goal, declaring that “Nothing in [Article 6] shall be invoked to delay or to prevent the abolition of capital punishment by any State Party to the present Covenant.” This goal was codified in the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty, which was promulgated on December 15, 1989. As of December 2022, ninety nations were parties to the optional protocol.

Article IV of the American Convention on Human Rights expands upon the right to life recognized in the ICCPR, providing that the death penalty “shall not be extended to crimes to which it does not presently apply” and “shall not be re-established in states that have abolished it.” It also provides that capital punishment shall not be imposed upon individuals who were age 70 or older at the time of the offense, or while a petition seeking clemency is pending decision. The United States is not a party to the American Convention.

Some of the other international human rights treaties that have an impact on the administration of capital punishment in the U.S. are: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, and the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules).

At Issue

Globally, the death penalty is typically examined through a human rights framework, but the U.S. generally views the issue through a criminal legal lens. Annual UN reports on the use of capital punishment worldwide regularly focus on the ways in which the administration of the death penalty violate fundamental human rights, including the denial of due process, racial discrimination, secrecy, and inhumane conditions of confinement and methods of execution. The European Union has repeatedly stated its opposition in all circumstances to capital punishment as an inherent violation of the human right to life, as has Pope Francis on behalf of the worldwide Catholic Church. Human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have also stated their universal opposition to the death penalty.

This discrepancy between international and domestic discourse is reflected in the a lack of emphasis on human rights in the U.S.. In August 2022, UN Committee Expert and Country Rapporteur Faith Dikeledi Pansy Tlakula, on behalf of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, “expressed concern at the lack of an institutionalised coordinating mechanism such as a national human rights institution” in the U.S.

In 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution calling for a worldwide moratorium on the death penalty with a view to abolition. In each of the eight General Assembly biennial sessions since, the UN has approved new versions of this resolution, with its December 15, 2022 vote receiving 125 votes in favor, 37 against, and 22 abstentions. The United States, along with Iran, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, China, and Vietnam, voted no. A memorandum explaining the U.S. vote asserted that “judicial enforcement of the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ensures substantive due process that applies at both the federal and state levels and prohibits methods of execution that would constitute cruel and unusual punishment.”

A July 2022 report of the UN Secretary-General on the Question of the Death Penalty noted that “170 States have abolished or introduced a moratorium on the death penalty either in law or in practice, or have suspended executions for more than 10 years.” Abolition of the death penalty is a prerequisite for membership in the European Union and the U.S. remains an outlier as one of the only western democracies to retain capital punishment.

The U.S. rarely ratifies international human rights instruments and when it does, it typically declares them non-self-executing and includes reservations exempting itself from certain provisions. The five ratifications of human rights treaties by the U.S. are notably fewer than the numbers ratified by its neighbors, Canada (13) and Mexico (16), and its allies in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.

What DPIC Offers

In 2022, DPIC undertook a new project on Human Rights and the U.S. Death Penalty that featured a series of events and activities undertaken with the support of the Foreign Office of the Federal Republic of Germany. The events included a live presentations on human rights and the death penalty in Berlin and at the Germany Embassy in Washington, D.C., a webinar series examining various policy issues relating to the U.S. administration and use of the death penalty, the recording of a podcast viewing racial issues in the administration of the U.S. death penalty through a human rights lens, and the first of DPIC’s human rights webpages. The webinars examined Race, Human Rights, and the U.S. Death Penalty; Human Rights, Excessive Punishment, and Conditions of Death-Row Confinement in the U.S., and Secrecy, Execution Methods, & the International Response.

DPIC provides webpages on Foreign Nationals on U.S. Death Row, including violations of U.S. human rights obligations to provide capitally charged defendants notice of their right to consular assistance and on major reports on human rights issues in the death penalty worldwide. These include Amnesty International’s annual reports on global use of the death penalty, Harm Reduction International’s reports on the use of the death penalty for non-violent drug offenses in violation of international law, and the Cornell Center for the Death Penalty Worldwide’s report on the application of the death penalty against women. DPIC also offers human rights analysis of the confinement of prisoners on death rows across the U.S., documenting more than 1,500 violations of U.S. human rights obligations.


DPIC would like to especially thank our former Executive Director, Robert Dunham, for his inspiration in envisioning and developing this human rights project.

We would also like to acknowledge the generous assistance from the Foreign Office of the Federal Republic of Germany for encouraging and supporting this focus on human rights and the death penalty.

News & Developments


News

Jun 05, 2024

Worldwide Wednesday International Roundup: China, Iran, Malaysia, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and Zimbabwe

On May 7, 2024, Harm Reduction International (HRI) released a spe­cial glob­al overview report on the use of the death penal­ty for drug offens­es, which is a vio­la­tion of inter­na­tion­al law because drug offens­es do not meet the most seri­ous” crimes thresh­old. HRI found that by the end of 2023, there were 34 coun­tries which still retained the death penal­ty for drug-relat­ed offens­es; Pakistan was the only coun­try to recent­ly elim­i­nate the death penal­ty for such offens­es – the first coun­try in more…

Read More

News

May 30, 2024

Amnesty International Global Report (2023): Lowest Number of Countries Carried Out Highest Number of Recorded Executions in Nearly a Decade, Driven by Iran (74% of Total)

According to Amnesty International’s annu­al death penal­ty report for 2023, 16 coun­tries car­ried out the 1,153 known exe­cu­tions last year, con­sti­tut­ing the low­est num­ber of exe­cut­ing coun­tries on record with the orga­ni­za­tion but the high­est record­ed exe­cu­tion num­bers since 2015. The 31% glob­al increase in record­ed exe­cu­tions is attrib­ut­able to the 48% rise in exe­cu­tions in Iran (at least 853 exe­cu­tions), which account­ed for 74% of record­ed exe­cu­tions world­wide. Saudi Arabia came in sec­ond with…

Read More

News

May 01, 2024

Worldwide Wednesday International Roundup: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iran, Japan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Uganda, United States, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe

Missouri’s April 9th exe­cu­tion of Brian Dorsey, despite wide­spread sup­port for his clemen­cy, once again gar­nered con­dem­na­tion from the European Union, which described it as a inhu­man and degrad­ing prac­tice.” The EU’s state­ment high­light­ed the lack of the death penal­ty as a deter­rent and the irre­versibil­i­ty of the pun­ish­ment, not­ing that 197 death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers have been exon­er­at­ed. The EU con­tin­ues to call for the uni­ver­sal abo­li­tion of the death penal­ty and for States, that maintain…

Read More

News

Apr 18, 2024

United States Provides Binding Assurances to the United Kingdom that Julian Assange Will Not Face the Death Penalty If Extradited

On April 16, 2024, the Biden Administration pro­vid­ed assur­ances to the United Kingdom that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is fac­ing extra­di­tion to the United States on espi­onage charges, would not face the death penal­ty. A hear­ing is now sched­uled in London on May 20 to eval­u­ate the assur­ances and decide whether Mr. Assange has any remain­ing legal recourse. A few weeks ear­li­er, the High Court in London grant­ed Mr. Assange a reprieve from extra­di­tion, agree­ing to grant him an appeal if…

Read More

News

Apr 03, 2024

Worldwide Wednesday International Roundup: Afghanistan, Democratic Republic of the Congo, India, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and United States

Georgia’s exe­cu­tion of Willie Pye – the state’s first in more than four years – gar­nered crit­i­cism from the European Union. Although the European Union and its 27 Member States oppose cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in all cir­cum­stances, we are espe­cial­ly con­cerned about the sched­uled exe­cu­tion of Mr. Pye giv­en his intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty and issues regard­ing the qual­i­ty of his legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion,” said the EU’s let­ter to the state’s Board of Pardons and Parole in sup­port of Mr. Pye’s clemency…

Read More