Publications & Testimony

After mem­bers of the Wisconsin Senate passed a res­o­lu­tion call­ing for a ref­er­en­dum on rein­stat­ing the death penalt, a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel edi­to­r­i­al crit­i­cized the vote and urged mem­bers of the state Assembly to reject the pro­pos­al. ThoughWisconsin has not had the death penal­ty since 1853, the state leg­is­la­ture has con­sid­ered a rein­state­ment mea­sure dur­ing each of the past 20 years. The Sentinel voiced con­cerns about inno­cence, race, deter­rence, and…

South Dakota has sched­uled the exe­cu­tion of 24-year-old Elijah Page on August 28 for a mur­der com­mit­ted in 2000. Page has dropped his remain­ing appeals. He would be the first per­son exe­cut­ed in the state since it rein­stat­ed cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in 1979. The last exe­cu­tion in the state was in 1947. South Dakota has only four peo­ple on its death row. Among church lead­ers in South…

After spend­ing 18 years in prison for a crime he did not com­mit, Arthur Mumphrey received a full par­don from Texas Governor Rick Perry. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles had unan­i­mous­ly rec­om­mend­ed that Perry par­don Mumphrey based on DNA test results that showed he was not respon­si­ble for assault­ing a 13-year-old girl in 1986, a crime for which Mumphrey was sen­tenced to serve 35 years in prison.​“My action today can­not give back the time he spent in prison, but it does…

New Jersey Attorney General Zulima Farber (pic­tured) recent­ly voiced her sup­port for extend­ing the state’s mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions, not­ing that she does not believe the death penal­ty is a​“nec­es­sary tool” for pros­e­cu­tors and believes cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment does not deter crime. ​“I don’t think it’s a deter­rent. And I under­stand revenge. I think some peo­ple deserve it. But I don’t think it’s a nec­es­sary tool.… I don’t have a philo­soph­i­cal or religious…

Each year, DPIC col­lects rel­e­vant death penal­ty arti­cles that have appeared in print and on media Web sites. Our col­lec­tion cer­tain­ly does not con­tain all such arti­cles, nor do we claim that it rep­re­sents the​“best” arti­cles. It is only a rep­re­sen­ta­tive sam­ple of the exten­sive cov­er­age giv­en to cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in print in a par­tic­u­lar year. For those inter­est­ed in exam­in­ing this cov­er­age, we have pre­pared an index of the arti­cles from 2005 in PDF…

A jury in Georgia elect­ed to sen­tence James Sullivan to life with­out parole after find­ing him guilty of hir­ing a hit­man to kill his wife in 1987.​“We thought that life impris­on­ment with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole was enough. We did­n’t want to be the judge about some­body else’s life. We want­ed God to be the judge,” said juror Debra Klayman after the sen­tence was hand­ed down. The jury had the option of the death penal­ty, life with­out parole, or life with parole.

The President’s DNA Initiative has released Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court, a CD-ROM that address­es the use of DNA in judi­cial pro­ceed­ings. This resource is designed for pros­e­cu­tors, defense attor­neys, and judges, and pro­vides a sim­ple overview of DNA tech­nolo­gies and the issues that arise when DNA evi­dence is pre­sent­ed in court. The top­ics are cov­ered in short para­graphs accom­pa­nied by illus­tra­tions, and links to oth­er resources are…

A new report issued by Amnesty International exam­ines the issue of men­tal ill­ness and the death penal­ty. The report notes that the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sions to halt the exe­cu­tions of juve­nile offend­ers and those with men­tal retar­da­tion left a ques­tion mark over anoth­er cat­e­go­ry of offend­er, the men­tal­ly ill. In the report, Amnesty asks:​“If the dimin­ished cul­pa­bil­i­ty asso­ci­at­ed with youth and men­tal retar­da­tion ren­der the death penal­ty an excessive…

According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, hous­ing an inmate in California’s cor­rec­tions sys­tem costs an aver­age of $34,150 per year, though that fig­ure is high­er for those on death row or serv­ing a sen­tence of life-with­­out-parole. In cap­i­tal cas­es, a more expen­sive inves­ti­ga­tion and pros­e­cu­tion process, as well as long and com­pli­cat­ed appeals, rais­es the costs sig­nif­i­cant­ly. Only about 1% of homi­cides in the state are tried as…

The British Privy Council in London unan­i­mous­ly struck down the impo­si­tion of manda­to­ry death sen­tences in the Bahamas. This land­mark deci­sion held that the law​“should be con­strued as impos­ing a dis­cre­tionary and not a manda­to­ry sen­tence of death.” The Privy Council rul­ing said that the manda­to­ry death penal­ty should have been regard­ed as inhu­mane and degrad­ing pun­ish­ment as ear­ly as 1973.​“The ram­i­fi­ca­tions and con­se­quences of the Privy Council’s ruling…