Policy

Sentencing Alternatives

Alternative sentences avoid some of the key problems with capital punishment, including the high cost of the death penalty and the risk of executing an innocent person.

DPIC Podcast: Discussions With DPIC

DPIC Podcast: Discussions With DPIC

Missouri Attorney Discusses Winning Life Sentence in Federal Prison-Killing Case

Overview 

Discussion around the death penal­ty has increas­ing­ly shift­ed away from a moral debate to a com­par­i­son of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and its viable alter­na­tives. The choice today for pros­e­cu­tors, jurors, leg­is­la­tors, and the courts is usu­al­ly between the death penal­ty and a sen­tence of life with­out parole (LWOP). Some vic­tims’ fam­i­lies pre­fer LWOP to the uncer­tain­ty of secur­ing a death sen­tence and the like­li­hood of many years of appeals before an exe­cu­tion would occur. Many pros­e­cu­tors have also con­clud­ed that the high costs asso­ci­at­ed with cap­i­tal cas­es are unaf­ford­able, espe­cial­ly with the high rate of rever­sals. As the avail­abil­i­ty and use of LWOP has expand­ed, the num­ber of death sen­tences has declined dramatically.

States have also looked beyond pun­ish­ment to alter­na­tive ways of reduc­ing vio­lent crime, includ­ing com­mu­ni­ty polic­ing, the intro­duc­tion of crime-fight­ing tech­nol­o­gy, and restora­tive jus­tice efforts. In some juris­dic­tions, resources not expend­ed in seek­ing the death penal­ty could be used to sup­port these initiatives.

At Issue 

Many pros­e­cu­tors are reluc­tant to elim­i­nate the death penal­ty as an option because they see it as a bar­gain­ing chip that results in cap­i­tal defen­dants plead­ing guilty in exchange for tak­ing the death penal­ty off the table. Commentators have not­ed that the use of the death penal­ty as a threat is con­cern­ing on both eth­i­cal and con­sti­tu­tion­al grounds.

Some oppo­nents of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment also char­ac­ter­ize the use of life-with­out-parole sen­tences as just anoth­er kind of death sen­tence and note its expand­ed use even in non-cap­i­tal cas­es con­tributed to the cur­rent prob­lem of mass incar­cer­a­tion. According to a 2021 report from The Sentencing Project, the num­ber of peo­ple serv­ing sen­tences of life with­out parole has increased 66% since 2003; one out of sev­en incar­cer­at­ed per­sons is serv­ing a sen­tence of either LWOP, life with parole, or a sen­tence of 50 years or more. Aligning with larg­er racial dis­par­i­ties in prison sen­tenc­ing, there is a dis­pro­por­tion­ate num­ber of Black peo­ple serv­ing LWOP sen­tences, accord­ing to 2020 data from the Prison Policy Initiative. The U.S. con­tin­ues to have the world’s high­est prison pop­u­la­tion per capi­ta, with 629 peo­ple per 100,000 in prison, accord­ing to Penal Reform International’s 2022 Global Prison Trends. On the oth­er hand, LWOP has been avail­able as an option in every state that has abol­ished the death penal­ty in recent years, and some defense lawyers acknowl­edge that with­out LWOP many of their clients would be in dan­ger of receiv­ing death sentences.

What DPI Offers 

Recent opin­ion polls note the public’s view of using the death penal­ty vs. alter­na­tive sen­tences, and DPI has col­lect­ed the results of those sur­veys. DPI also pro­vides infor­ma­tion on state leg­isla­tive efforts to adopt LWOP and exam­ines when and how LWOP results in cas­es where juries can­not agree on a death sentence.

News & Developments


News

May 06, 2026

Reclaiming Life From the Ashes”: How Clemency Can Honor Rehabilitation on Death Row

On death row, pris­on­ers expe­ri­ence some of the harsh­est con­di­tions in the American prison sys­tem, which often take a severe psy­cho­log­i­cal and phys­i­cal toll. Despite these chal­lenges, many death-sen­­tenced pris­on­ers com­plete­ly trans­form in prison — they become remorse­ful, accept respon­si­bil­i­ty, and devote them­selves to edu­ca­tion, men­tor­ship, faith, and advo­ca­cy. Their sto­ries stand in stark con­trast to the com­mon nar­ra­tive that peo­ple sen­tenced to death…

Read More

News

Apr 20, 2026

Texas Death Sentence Vacated for Mentally Ill and Intellectually Disabled Man After Half-Century on Death Row — And Nearly 40 Years Without a Lawyer

By the time 21-year-old Clarence Curtis Jordan shot a man dur­ing a gro­cery store bur­glary in 1977, he had been strug­gling for most of his life with hal­lu­ci­na­tions and intel­lec­tu­al deficits. His IQ score placed him in the bot­tom 0.5% of the pop­u­la­tion. He iden­ti­fied the pres­i­dent as​“John Hill” and said he often saw​“old, weird, burnt-up look­ing peo­ple” watch­ing him. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) found him incom­pe­tent to be exe­cut­ed in 1988. But Mr.

Read More

News

Mar 09, 2026

What to Know: Costs and the Death Penalty

DPI’s​“What to Know” series exam­ines cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment from mul­ti­ple angles, one top­ic at a time. Each install­ment pro­vides essen­tial facts and data on spe­cif­ic aspects of the death penal­ty. This install­ment looks at the costs asso­ci­at­ed with pur­suit of death sen­tences and exe­cu­tions. Why it mat­ters: The ques­tion at the heart of this issue is whether the assumed ben­e­fits of the death penal­ty are worth its costs and whether oth­er sys­tems might provide…

Read More

News

Jan 12, 2026

Marking a Decade Since Hurst v. Florida

Today is the ten-year anniver­sary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sion in Hurst v. Florida. Heralded as a water­shed rul­ing for cap­i­tal defen­dants, Hurst reaf­firmed the prin­ci­ple that the jury alone must find the facts nec­es­sary to con­demn a per­son to die — impli­cat­ing the death sen­tences of hun­dreds of pris­on­ers across three states. The Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury…

Read More

News

Oct 30, 2025

Low Death Sentencing, Lack of Deterrence, and High Costs Raise Questions Over Capital Punishment in Indiana

Indiana’s seem­ing­ly para­dox­i­cal resump­tion of exe­cu­tions, with three over the last year, is draw­ing scruti­ny from many cor­ners of the state. Governor Mike Braun, leg­is­la­tors from both polit­i­cal par­ties, pub­lic defend­ers and even pros­e­cu­tors have raised ques­tions about the costs of pros­e­cut­ing cap­i­tal cas­es and obtain­ing drugs for exe­cu­tions; the fail­ure of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment to deter crime; and the increas­ing reluc­tance of Indiana juries to sentence…

Read More