Policy

Costs

Studies consistently find that the death penalty is more expensive than alternative punishments.

DPI Report: The 2% Death Penalty

DPI Report: The 2% Death Penalty

How a Minority of Counties Produce Most Death Cases at Enormous Costs to All

DPI Report: Smart on Crime

DPI Report: Smart on Crime

Reconsidering the Death Penalty in a Time of Economic Crisis

Overview

The death penalty is a moral issue for some and a policy issue for others. However, it is also a government program with related costs. Many people assume that the state saves money by employing the death penalty since an executed person no longer requires confinement, health care, and related expenses. But in the modern application of capital punishment, that assumption has been repeatedly proven to be wrong.

The death penalty is far more expensive than a system utilizing life-without-parole sentences as an alternative punishment. Some of the reasons for the high cost of the death penalty are the longer trials and appeals required when a person’s life is on the line, the need for more lawyers and experts on both sides of the case, and the relative rarity of executions. Most cases in which the death penalty is sought do not end up with the death penalty being imposed. And once a death sentence is imposed, the most likely outcome of the case is that the conviction or death sentence will be overturned in the courts. Most defendants who are sentenced to death essentially end up spending life in prison, but at a highly inflated cost because the death penalty was involved in the process.

At Issue

How much the death penalty actually costs and how that compares to a system in which a life sentence is the maximum punishment can only be determined by sophisticated research and studies, usually at the state level. Many such studies have been conducted and their conclusions are consistent: the death penalty imposes a net cost on the taxpayers compared to life without parole. The question is whether the assumed benefits of the death penalty are worth its costs and whether other systems might provide similar benefits at less cost. The assessments of law enforcement experts are particularly relevant in identifying what expenditures are most effective in reducing crime.

What DPI Offers

This section contains summaries of each of the main cost studies on the death penalty and links to many of the entire studies. In addition, DPI has prepared a number of reports that relate to the question of costs and to the opinions of police chiefs and other experts in this field.

Why is the death penalty so expensive?

  • Legal costs: Almost all people who face the death penalty cannot afford their own attorney. The state must assign public defenders or court-appointed lawyers to represent them (the accepted practice is to assign two lawyers), and pay for the costs of the prosecution as well.
  • Pre-trial costs: Capital cases are far more complicated than non-capital cases and take longer to go to trial. Experts will probably be needed on forensic evidence, mental health, and the background and life history of the defendant. County taxpayers pick up the costs of added security and longer pre-trial detention.
  • Jury selection: Because of the need to question jurors thoroughly on their views about the death penalty, jury selection in capital cases is much more time consuming and expensive.
  • Trial: Death-penalty trials can last more than four times longer than non-capital trials, requiring juror and attorney compensation, in addition to court personnel and other related costs.
  • Incarceration: Most death rows involve solitary confinement in a special facility. These require more security and other accommodations as the prisoners are kept for 23 hours a day in their cells.
  • Appeals: To minimize mistakes, every prisoner is entitled to a series of appeals. The costs are borne at taxpayers’ expense. These appeals are essential because some inmates have come within hours of execution before evidence was uncovered proving their innocence.

News & Developments


News

Nov 05, 2026

Jeffrey Weisheit Executed Despite Urging of Attorneys and State Lawmakers to Pause Execution Over Concerns with Lethal Injection Drug Supplier

Five vials of clear liquid, varying sizes. One is on its side with a syringe in it.

Attorneys for death row prisoner Jeffrey Weisheit and a group of state lawmakers urged Indiana Governor Mike Braun to grant a temporary reprieve ahead of Mr. Weisheit’s November 5 execution date, arguing the state should not proceed until questions about its lethal injection drug supply were answered. After Gov. Braun rejected those calls, Mr. Weisheit was executed by lethal injection before sunrise on the 5th at Indiana State Prison. He was convicted of killing two children, Alyssa and Caleb…

Read More

News

Nov 03, 2026

Three Executions on November 5 Highlight Concerns about Fairness and Constitutionality of Death Sentences

On November 5, three people will be put to death in a single day across the United States, all by lethal injection. Indiana officials will execute Jeffrey Weisheit; Florida officials will execute Jesse Guardado; and Alabama officials will execute Michael Taylor. All three cases raise serious questions regarding the fairness of their trials and the constitutionality of their executions. This is the second time this year that three people are scheduled to die on the same day; the same occurred…

Read More

News

Oct 26, 2026

Newly Obtained Records Reveal Tennessee Spent $1.2 Million for Lethal Injection Drugs, Despite Failed Execution Attempts

Reporting from The Tennessean has revealed that since January 2023, Tennessee officials have spent nearly $1.2 million on drugs for lethal injection executions, despite failing to carry out two of its last three scheduled executions in 2026. Records obtained by the outlet indicate the Tennessee Department of Correction has made two payments since January 2023 related to lethal injection drugs: one payment for $525,000, and the other for $650,000. The records do not offer any information about…

Read More
Five vials of clear liquid, varying sizes. One is on its side with a syringe in it.

News

Sep 30, 2026

Arizona Co-Victims Speak Out, Wanting Death Penalty Money Redirected

During a local news conference on September 21, 2026, family members of homicide victims whose cases remain unsolved in Arizona called for sustained attention and resources for unsolved homicide cases. The call, supported by Arizonans for Effective Public Safety — a project of Death Penalty Alternatives for Arizona — comes amid broader questions about the costs and effectiveness of capital punishment in Arizona, and whether resources devoted to capital punishment and felony murder prosecutions…

Read More

News

Sep 17, 2026

Article of Interest: Georgia Records Reveal Rising Costs and Continued Secrecy Around Lethal Injection

The state of Georgia planned to execute Stacey Humphreys by lethal injection on September 16, 2026, but Cobb County Superior Court Judge Tyler Browning issued a stay that was upheld by the Georgia Supreme Court citing the Georgia Survivor Justice Act — a state law that allows the courts to consider a defendant’s history of abuse and trauma in sentencing. Mr. Humphreys’ execution would have marked Georgia’s first execution in two years. Critics have long raised concerns about Georgia’s lethal…

Read More