Publications & Testimony

Items: 5661 — 5670


Oct 27, 2004

NEW VOICES: Texas Judge Calls for Halt to Executions

Judge Tom Price, a 30-year vet­er­an Republican jurist on Texas’s high­est crim­i­nal court, recent­ly stat­ed that those on the state’s death row con­vict­ed with evi­dence from the Houston Police Department crime lab should not be exe­cut­ed until ques­tions about its work are resolved. Price called for a lim­it­ed mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions, say­ing, I think it would be pru­dent to delay fur­ther exe­cu­tions until we have had a chance to have this evi­dence inde­pen­dent­ly ver­i­fied. Once a death sentence…

Read More

Oct 21, 2004

NEW RESOURCE: New Book Examines Flawed Texas Death Penalty

In No Justice: No Victory — The Death Penalty in Texas,” author Susan Lee Campbell Solar exam­ines cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in Texas through a polit­i­cal lens and with a con­cen­tra­tion on cas­es and anec­dotes that illus­trate the sys­temic flaws she uncov­ered dur­ing her research. The book, com­plet­ed by friends and fam­i­ly of the author after she died unex­pect­ed­ly, fea­tures inter­views with attor­neys, judges and law pro­fes­sors, as well as with those on death row, their fam­i­ly mem­bers, and families…

Read More

Oct 21, 2004

Chicago Tribune Series Examines How Arson Myths May Lead to Wrongful Convictions

As part of its five-part series on foren­sic sci­ence and wrong­ful con­vic­tions, the Chicago Tribune exam­ined how sci­en­tif­ic devel­op­ments in fire inves­ti­ga­tions have called into ques­tion cru­cial expert tes­ti­mo­ny in many cas­es, includ­ing some death penal­ty pros­e­cu­tions. As a result of untest­ed the­o­ries, shod­dy analy­sis and a resis­tance to rig­or­ous review, long-time arson inves­ti­ga­tors are now see­ing their con­clu­sions con­tra­dict­ed by col­leagues who ques­tion the reli­a­bil­i­ty of the folk wisdom that…

Read More

Oct 21, 2004

NEW VOICES: California Bar Association Urges Death Penalty Moratorium

A group of 450 attor­neys par­tic­i­pat­ing in the Conference of Delegates of the California Bar Association has urged a mora­to­ri­um on the death penal­ty in California until the state reviews whether cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment laws are enforced fair­ly and uni­form­ly. If you make a mis­take, it’s not like you can go back and cor­rect a mis­take because the per­son is dead,” said Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney Danette Meyers, sup­port­er of the mea­sure and a mem­ber of the Bar…

Read More

Oct 21, 2004

Many African Nations Abandoning Death Penalty

During the past 15 years, the num­ber of African nations aban­don­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment has risen from one to 10, and anoth­er 10 nations have abol­ished the death penal­ty in prac­tice accord­ing to a recent tal­ly by Amnesty International. As this trend toward abol­ish­ing the death penal­ty con­tin­ues, few­er Africans than ever are being exe­cut­ed by their gov­ern­ments. The anti-cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment move­ment has been espe­cial­ly pow­er­ful in West Africa, where the num­ber of coun­tries in the Economic…

Read More

Oct 21, 2004

DPIC SUMMARY: Chicago Tribune Series, Forensics Under the Microscope”

A CHICAGO TRIBUNE INVESTIGATIVE SERIESChicago Tribune vet­er­an project reporters Flynn McRoberts, Steve Mills and Maurice Possley, togeth­er with researcher Judith Marriott, scru­ti­nized crim­i­nal cas­es includ­ing sci­en­tif­ic” or foren­sic evi­dence, con­duct­ing hun­dreds of inter­views across the coun­try and exam­in­ing thou­sands of court doc­u­ments. From October 17, 2004 to October 21, 2004 the Tribune pub­lished a five-part inves­tiga­tive series which details the use of forensic evidence…

Read More

Oct 19, 2004

Chicago Tribune Investigates Forensic Science and Wrongful Convictions

A five-part Chicago Tribune inves­ti­ga­tion of foren­sics in the court­room has revealed that flawed test­ing analy­sis, ques­tion­able sci­ence once con­sid­ered reli­able, and shod­dy crime lab prac­tices can often lead to wrong­ful con­vic­tions. Developments in DNA tech­nol­o­gy have helped shed new light on these prob­lems by reveal­ing the shaky sci­en­tif­ic foun­da­tions of tech­niques like fin­ger­print­ing, firearm iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, arson inves­ti­ga­tion, and bite-mark com­par­i­son. A review of 200 DNA and death row…

Read More

Oct 19, 2004

NEW VOICES: Bush and Kerry Express Views on Executing Juvenile Offenders

In a forum host­ed by the New Voters Project, U.S. Presidential can­di­dates George Bush and John Kerry expressed their views on exe­cut­ing juve­nile offend­ers. Federal law pro­hibits exe­cu­tion of those under 18 when the offense was com­mit­ted, and I see no rea­son to change that statute,” said President Bush. Senator John Kerry stat­ed, I do not think that exe­cut­ing minors is good pol­i­cy.” (Knight-Ridder, October 17, 2004). On October 13th, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argu­ments in Roper v.

Read More