Publications & Testimony

Items: 5691 — 5700


Oct 12, 2004

NEW RESOURCE: An Account of Life on Death Row

In Waiting to Die: Life on Death Row,” Richard M. Rossi pro­vides a first-hand account of his dai­ly life on Arizona’s death row. Rossi was sen­tenced to death in 1983 and has tak­en respon­si­bil­i­ty for the mur­der he com­mit­ted. He was orig­i­nal­ly offered a plea bar­gain with a life sen­tence, but he decid­ed to go to tri­al. He has been on death row for 20 years. In his book, Rossi details how pris­on­ers sur­vive on death row, the con­di­tions under which they live, and the psy­cho­log­i­cal toll that…

Read More

Oct 10, 2004

LEGISLATION: Senate and House Pass Versions of Innocence Protection Act

On October 9, the U.S. Senate passed by voice vote a bill called the Justice for All Act of 2004” that con­tains impor­tant ele­ments of the Innocence Protection Act, orig­i­nal­ly intro­duced in 2000. A sim­i­lar bill recent­ly over­whelm­ing­ly passed the House of Representatives (HR 5107), and it is expect­ed that the final leg­is­la­tion will now be signed into law. The bill pro­vides for expand­ed access to DNA test­ing for prison inmates and assis­tance to states for both defense and prosecution in…

Read More

Oct 08, 2004

ARBITRARINESS: Execution May Go Forward Despite Nearly Even Split on Innocence

A deeply divid­ed U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled 8 – 7 that the exe­cu­tion of Tennessee death row inmate Paul Gregory House may move for­ward despite the fact that near­ly half of the judges believe he is not guilty and should be freed imme­di­ate­ly. We are faced with a real-life mur­der mys­tery, an authen­tic who-done-it’ where the wrong man may be exe­cut­ed,” wrote dis­sent­ing judge Ronald Lee Gilman. A N.Y. Times arti­cle not­ed that although courts are often close­ly divided on…

Read More

Oct 08, 2004

NEW RESOURCE: Research with Jurors Finds Reluctance to Sentence Juveniles to Death

A recent­ly pub­lished study by Northeastern crim­i­nal jus­tice pro­fes­sors William J. Bowers and Michael E. Antonio, in con­junc­tion with University of Delaware pro­fes­sors Valerie P. Hans and Benjamin D. Fleury-Steiner, finds jurors very reluc­tant to give the death penal­ty to juve­nile defen­dants because of their imma­tu­ri­ty and dys­func­tion­al fam­i­ly back­grounds. “ In inter­view­ing almost 1,200 jurors, we’ve found that jurors across the nation would near­ly always sen­tence a juve­nile to life,” said…

Read More

Oct 06, 2004

Former President Leads Worldwide Call For An End To Juvenile Death Penalty

FORMER PRESIDENT LEADS WORLDWIDE CALL FOR AN END TO JUVENILE DEATH PENALTY The U. S. Supreme Court will hear argu­ments on Wednesday, October 13, 2004, in Roper v. Simmons to deter­mine the future of the juve­nile death penal­ty. Amicus briefs in sup­port of ban­ning the prac­tice have been filed by many promi­nent groups and indi­vi­dals, including:Nobel Peace Prize Winners (includ­ing Jimmy Carter, Mikhail Gorbachev, Desmond Tutu and Lech Walesa) American Medical Association American…

Read More

Oct 05, 2004

NEW RESOURCES: Research Shows Significant Decline in Death Sentences for Juveniles

In a forth­com­ing arti­cle, Columbia University researchers found that, since 1994, when death sen­tences for juve­nile offend­ers peaked, these sen­tences have declined sig­nif­i­cant­ly. In par­tic­u­lar, the decline in juve­nile death sen­tences since 1999 is sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant after con­trol­ling for the mur­der rate, the juve­nile homi­cide arrest rate, and the rate of adult death sen­tences. This down­ward trend in juve­nile death sen­tences is indica­tive of an evolv­ing stan­dard in state trial…

Read More

Oct 05, 2004

Another Innocent Inmate Close to Release in Texas

Ernest Willis is like­ly to be the eighth per­son exon­er­at­ed and freed from Texas’s death row. He would be the 117th per­son freed nation­wide since 1973. Willis was sen­tenced to death 17 years ago for alleged­ly set­ting a house fire that killed two peo­ple. Now the state’s own fire expert, Gerald Hurst, has con­clud­ed: There is not a sin­gle item of phys­i­cal evience in this case which sup­ports a find­ing of arson.” He labeled some of the sci­en­tif­ic” evi­dence at Willis’s first trial as…

Read More