On May 24, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a deci­sion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, there­by giv­ing the defen­dant anoth­er chance to show that his tri­al coun­sel was con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly inef­fec­tive. Lawrence Jefferson was sen­tenced to death in Georgia, despite the fact that he had suf­fered seri­ous head injuries as a child. In an appeal in state court, he claimed that his attor­ney failed to inves­ti­gate this ear­ly trau­ma. The state court reject­ed this claim, and asked the pros­e­cu­tors to draw up an opin­ion deny­ing the appeal. The court then issued the opin­ion ver­ba­tim with­out giv­ing the defense a chance to inter­vene. The Eleventh Circuit gave great def­er­ence to the state court’s deci­sion and upheld the death sen­tence. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeals failed to ade­quate­ly con­sid­er whether Jefferson had been afford­ed a fair hear­ing in state court. The Court held that the Court of Appeals only con­sid­ered one of the eight excep­tions to the usu­al def­er­ence giv­en state court find­ings. As with a num­ber of cap­i­tal cas­es this term, the Supreme Court grant­ed cer­tio­rari and ren­dered its deci­sion the same day, with­out oral argu­ment or a signed opin­ion. Justices Scalia and Thomas dis­sent­ed from the per curiam opinion.

(Jefferson v. Upton, No. 09 – 8852 (U.S., cert. grant­ed, reversed and remand­ed May 24, 2010) (per curi­am)). Read the Supreme Court opin­ion here. See also U.S. Supreme Court.

Citation Guide