On June 9, 2026, an Alabama fed­er­al dis­trict judge per­ma­nent­ly enjoined” state offi­cials from using nitro­gen gas to exe­cute death-sen­tenced pris­on­er Jeffery Lee after find­ing that the state’s nitro­gen exe­cu­tion pro­to­col vio­lates the Eighth Amendment’s pro­hi­bi­tion on cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment. Judge Emily Marks issued her rul­ing after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found the pro­to­col uncon­sti­tu­tion­al and remand­ed the case for con­sid­er­a­tion of Mr. Lee’s pro­posed alter­na­tive method of exe­cu­tion — the fir­ing squad. Judge Marks first found that Alabama’s nitro­gen gas pro­to­col presents a sub­stan­tial risk of seri­ous harm’ — severe pain over and above death itself.” She then found that Mr. Lee’s fir­ing squad pro­pos­al is fea­si­ble, read­i­ly imple­ment­ed, and sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduces the sub­stan­tial risk of seri­ous harm posed by” Alabama’s nitro­gen pro­to­col. Alabama appealed the dis­trict court’s deci­sion; how­ev­er, the same Eleventh Circuit pan­el upheld the low­er court’s rul­ing by a vote of 2:1. No stay of exe­cu­tion is in place, how­ev­er; Mr. Lee’s exe­cu­tion remains sched­uled for June 112026.

Alabama state offi­cials have now filed a peti­tion for cer­tio­rari at the U.S. Supreme Court, ask­ing it to allow them to use nitro­gen gas to exe­cute Mr. Lee.* While the Supreme Court has nev­er inval­i­dat­ed a method of exe­cu­tion as uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, it has also nev­er con­sid­ered the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of nitro­gen gas executions. 

To pre­vail on an Eighth Amendment chal­lenge to an exe­cu­tion method, the U.S. Supreme Court requires pris­on­ers to demon­strate two things: first, that an exe­cu­tion method pos­es a sub­stan­tial risk” of caus­ing severe pain, and sec­ond, to iden­ti­fy a rea­son­able, avail­able alter­na­tive method of exe­cu­tion which sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduces the risk of severe pain. The Eleventh Circuit con­clu­sion that Alabama’s pro­to­col con­sti­tutes a sub­stan­tial risk” of pain, not­ed that “[c]ounting to 60 or 180 sec­onds is not a quick exer­cise, and con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly speak­ing, that time­frame is intol­er­a­ble giv­en the suf­fer­ing that would like­ly take place under Alabama’s nitro­gen hypox­ia pro­to­col.” The pan­el added that “[s]uch suf­fer­ing, we believe, is over and above the men­tal dis­tress that typ­i­cal­ly accom­pa­nies the knowl­edge of impending death.” 

Following the appeals court’s direc­tion, Judge Marks found that Alabama failed to artic­u­late a legit­i­mate peno­log­i­cal rea­son for refus­ing to adopt Lee’s pro­posed alter­na­tive.” She con­clud­ed, “[t]herefore, Lee has shown by a pre­pon­der­ance of the evi­dence that the pro­to­col con­sti­tutes cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment in vio­la­tion of the Eighth Amendment.” Judge Marks wrote that while her order blocks the state from using its nitro­gen gas pro­to­col, her rul­ing does not dis­turb the state’s abil­i­ty to admin­is­ter cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment,” as the state offers two oth­er autho­rized meth­ods of exe­cu­tion: lethal injec­tion and the electric chair.

Judge Marks’ rul­ing blocks Alabama’s use of its nitro­gen gas pro­to­col. Nitrogen gas has been used in eight exe­cu­tions since 2024 — sev­en times in Alabama and once in Louisiana. The method involves strap­ping a gas mask to the prisoner’s face and replac­ing breath­able air with pure nitro­gen gas, caus­ing death from a lack of oxy­gen. Witnesses at all of the exe­cu­tions using nitro­gen gas have not­ed that pris­on­ers appear to be in pain and dis­tress

Mr. Lee was con­vict­ed and sen­tenced to death for the 1998 mur­ders of Jimmy Ellis and Elaine Thompson dur­ing a rob­bery in Orrville, Alabama. At tri­al, Mr. Lee’s jury vot­ed 7 – 5 to rec­om­mend a life sen­tence with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. Under Alabama’s judi­cial over­ride law, Mr. Lee’s tri­al judge reject­ed the jury’s rec­om­men­da­tion and instead imposed a death sen­tence. In 2017, Alabama abol­ished the prac­tice of judi­cial over­ride; how­ev­er, the law did not apply retroac­tive­ly. Mr. Lee is among more than two dozen pris­on­ers still sen­tenced to death in Alabama as a result of judi­cial over­ride, the major­i­ty of whom had life sen­tences from juries over­rid­den by judges. Two jurors from Mr. Lee’s orig­i­nal tri­al have said in a video sub­mit­ted as part of his clemen­cy cam­paign that they are frus­trat­ed with the tri­al judge’s deci­sion to over­rule their rec­om­men­da­tion for a life sentence.

*This sto­ry will be updat­ed on June 12, 2026, to reflect the out­come of the state’s appeal to the Supreme Court.

Citation Guide