Entries by Death Penalty Information Center

Twenty-two years after Walter Ogrod (pic­tured) was sen­tenced to death for a mur­der he insists he did not com­mit, a new Philadelphia District Attorney’s admin­is­tra­tion has dropped the office’s long-time oppo­si­tion to Ogrod’s request for DNA test­ing and has referred the case for review by a revi­tal­ized Conviction Integrity…

Less than three months after the U.S. Supreme Court direct­ed a fed­er­al appeals court to recon­sid­er whether Georgia death-row pris­on­er Keith Tharpe (pic­tured) is enti­tled to fed­er­al-court review of his claim that he was uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly sen­tenced to death because he is Black, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has declined to review Tharpe’s appeal, say­ing he had nev­er pre­sent­ed the issue…

In response to what it calls​“a crit­i­cal and unmet need for edu­ca­tion and train­ing of both lawyers rep­re­sent­ing cap­i­tal pris­on­ers and deci­sion mak­ers who review peti­tions for clemen­cy,” the American Bar Association (ABA) has cre­at­ed a new web resource devot­ed to the clemen­cy process. The Capital Clemency Resource Initiative (CCRI) Clearinghouse — a joint project of the ABA Death Penalty Representation Project and Death Penalty Due Process…

Race dis­crim­i­na­tion exists at every stage of the death-penal­­­ty process, says vet­er­an death-penal­­­ty and civ­il-rights lawyer Stephen B. Bright (pic­tured), but​“the most per­va­sive dis­crim­i­na­tion that is going on is in jury selec­tion.” In a new Discussions With DPIC pod­cast, Bright — the for­mer President of the Southern Center for Human Rights who has argued jury dis­crim­i­na­tion cas­es three times in the U.S. Supreme Court — calls…

A Utah judge has exco­ri­at­ed the Utah Department of Corrections for prac­tices he called​“sneaky” and​“deceit­ful” and a state pros­e­cu­tor has dropped the death penal­ty after learn­ing that state prison offi­cials had with­held near­ly 1,600 pages of prison records from a defen­dant fac­ing cap­i­tal charges in a prison killing. Despite a court order to pro­duce all prison records, the depart­ment had failed to dis­close med­ical and men­tal health records detailing…

A Utah judge has exco­ri­at­ed the Utah Department of Corrections for prac­tices he called​“sneaky” and​“deceit­ful” and a state pros­e­cu­tor has dropped the death penal­ty after learn­ing that state prison offi­cials had with­held near­ly 1,600 pages of prison records from a defen­dant fac­ing cap­i­tal charges in a prison killing. Despite a court order to pro­duce all prison records, the depart­ment had failed to dis­close med­ical and men­tal health records detailing…

The University of Virginia School of Law has cre­at­ed a new inter­ac­tive web resource (click on map) that allows researchers and the pub­lic to visu­al­ly explore death-sen­­­tenc­ing prac­tices in the United States from 1991 through 2017. The inter­ac­tive map pro­vides coun­­­ty-lev­­­el data on death sen­tences imposed across the United States, draw­ing from a new data­base cre­at­ed by University of Virginia Law Professor Brandon Garrett (pic­tured) for his recent book, End of Its…

Multiple fac­tors — from declin­ing mur­der rates to the aban­don­ment of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment by many rur­al coun­ties and sub­stan­tial­ly reduced usage in out­lier coun­ties that had aggres­sive­ly imposed it in the past — have col­lec­tive­ly led to an​“aston­ish­ing plunge” in death sen­tences over the last twen­ty years, accord­ing to a new study, Lethal Rejection, pub­lished in the 2017/​2018 Albany Law Review. Using data on death-eli­gi­ble cas­es from 1994, 2004,…

One month after Alabama called off its two-and-a-half hour attempt­ed exe­cu­tion of Doyle Hamm, the state reached a con­fi­den­tial set­tle­ment agree­ment in which it agreed not to seek anoth­er exe­cu­tion date and Hamm’s attor­ney dis­missed his client’s pending civil-rights…

In his new book Surviving Execution: A Miscarriage of Justice and the Fight to End the Death Penalty, Sky News reporter Ian Woods tells the sto­ry of his rela­tion­ship with con­demned Oklahoma pris­on­er Richard Glossip, whose case gained promi­nence after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review his chal­lenge to the state’s lethal-injec­­­tion pro­ce­dures. Although Glossip’s case is most frequently associated…