Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Mar 242015

NEW VOICES: Lead Prosecutor Apologizes to Death Row Exoneree, Urges State to Offer Compensation

UPDATE: After Louisiana denied com­pen­sa­tion to Mr. Ford — who is in hos­pice care, dying from Stage 4 can­cer — Stroud gave an inter­view to the Huffington Post in which he says death penal­ty pros­e­cu­tions are a badge of show­ing how out-of-touch we are with oth­er civ­i­lized soci­eties.… We can’t trust the gov­ern­ment to fix pot­holes. Why should we believe they can design a death penal­ty sys­tem that’s fair?” PREVIOUSLY: In a let­ter to the Shreveport (Louisiana)…

Read More

News 

Mar 232015

Pope Francis Calls Death Penalty Inappropriate No Matter How Serious the Crime”

In a let­ter to the President of the International Commission Against the Death Penalty, Pope Francis expressed the Catholic Church’s oppo­si­tion to the death penal­ty, calling it inad­mis­si­ble, no mat­ter how seri­ous the crime com­mit­ted.” He continued, It is an offence against the invi­o­la­bil­i­ty of life and the dig­ni­ty of the human per­son, which con­tra­dicts God’s plan for man and soci­ety, and his mer­ci­ful jus­tice, and impedes the penal­ty from ful­fill­ing any just objec­tive. It…

Read More

News 

Mar 192015

INNOCENCE: Debra Milke Exonerated from Arizona Death Row

UPDATE: On March 23, 2015, Judge Rosa Mroz offi­cial­ly dis­missed the charges against Milke. Milke has been added to DPIC’s exon­er­a­tion list. See Milke’s state­ment on her exon­er­a­tion. PREVIOUSLY: On March 17, the Arizona Supreme Court denied a request by pros­e­cu­tors that it review a low­er court’s order that dis­missed the charges against Debra Milke as a result of egre­gious” police and pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al mis­con­duct and barring her…

Read More

News 

Mar 182015

STUDIES: Most Likely Outcome of Death Sentence Is That It Will Be Reversed

A new study from researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill finds that the most like­ly out­come for a cap­i­tal case once a death sen­tence has been imposed is that the defen­dan­t’s con­vic­tion or sen­tence will be reversed on appeal. Execution is only the third most likely…

Read More

News 

Mar 172015

Ohio Officials Say Death Penalty System Has Serious Flaws

Legislators in Ohio are seek­ing to enact death penal­ty reforms as the state grap­ples with prob­lems in the appli­ca­tion of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Sen. Bill Seitz, a Republican, and Sen. Sandra Williams, a Democrat, are work­ing on four bills to address some of the reforms rec­om­mend­ed by the Ohio Supreme Court Death Penalty Task Force last year. The bills would pre­vent the exe­cu­tion of defen­dants with seri­ous men­tal impair­ments, estab­lish a fund for indigent…

Read More

News 

Mar 162015

Key Witness In Cameron Willingham Trial May Have Testified In Exchange for Reduced Sentence

A pre­vi­ous­ly undis­closed let­ter writ­ten by jail­house infor­mant Johnny E. Webb, a cru­cial wit­ness in the tri­al of Cameron Willingham (pic­tured) in Texas, indi­cates that Webb’s sen­tence may have been reduced in exchange for his tes­ti­mo­ny that Willingham had con­fessed to inten­tion­al­ly start­ing a house fire that killed his three daugh­ters. The defense had nev­er been informed of the exis­tence of any deal between Webb and pros­e­cu­tors in the case. Willingham was…

Read More

News 

Mar 132015

Growing Number of Pharmaceutical Companies Object to Use of Drugs in Executions

On March 4, Akorn Pharmaceuticals, a man­u­fac­tur­er of two drugs (mida­zo­lam and pen­to­bar­bi­tal) that have been used in exe­cu­tions, released a state­ment announc­ing mea­sures to block the sale of its prod­ucts to pris­ons. Akorn joins at least two oth­er U.S.-based drug com­pa­nies and sev­er­al European com­pa­nies in express­ing oppo­si­tion to the use of their prod­ucts in lethal injec­tions. In 2014, Par Pharmaceuticals respond­ed to Indiana’s pro­posed use of one of their…

Read More

News 

Mar 122015

Supreme Court to Review Florida’s Death Penalty Scheme

On March 9, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Hurst v. Florida, a chal­lenge to the state’s unusu­al sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dure. In a pri­or rul­ing, Ring v. Arizona (2002), the Court held that the ques­tion of whether a defen­dant is eli­gi­ble for the death penal­ty is enti­tled to a jury deterem­i­na­tion. Unlike almost every oth­er state where unan­i­mous juries are required for death eli­gi­bil­i­ty and a death sen­tence, Florida only…

Read More