Entries by Death Penalty Information Center


News 

Mar 082023

BOOKS: Crossing the River Styx: The Memoir of a Death Row Chaplain”

In Crossing the River Styx: The Memoir of a Death Row Chaplain, (March 2023), author Russ Ford recounts the abus­es he wit­nessed as the head chap­lain of Virginia’s death row and the strong rela­tion­ships he formed with more than a dozen con­demned pris­on­ers. Through sto­ries, he describes the core of human dig­ni­ty he expe­ri­enced among death row pris­on­ers, as well as the treach­er­ous con­di­tions these indi­vid­u­als faced dur­ing their final…

Read More

News 

Mar 072023

California Sought the Death Penalty – 38 Years Later, the Defendant is Exonerated

In a case that demon­strates the risks inher­ent in the death penal­ty, Maurice Hastings was found fac­tu­al­ly inno­cent” in Los Angeles of the crime that could have sent him to death row and even­tu­al exe­cu­tion. On March 1, 2023, Judge William Ryan dis­missed all charges and freed Hastings, who was serv­ing a sen­tence of life without…

Read More

News 

Mar 032023

NEW VOICES: Former Warden Shares Traumatic Experience of Overseeing Executions

In a recent op-ed pub­lished in the Miami Herald, for­mer Florida war­den Ron McAndrew wrote about his expe­ri­ence with elec­tro­cu­tions and lethal injec­tions in Florida and Texas. He wit­nessed botched exe­cu­tions and observed the psy­cho­log­i­cal effects that car­ry­ing out the death penal­ty has on the correctional officers…

Read More

News 

Mar 022023

MENTAL ILLNESS: Excluding Those with Severe Mental Illness from the Death Penalty — A Menu of Legislative Options

In a forth­com­ing arti­cle in the Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice regard­ing lim­i­ta­tions on the death penal­ty for those with dimin­ished respon­si­bil­i­ty, Richard Bonnie sum­ma­rizes the rea­sons why an exclu­sion for severe men­tal ill­ness in cap­i­tal cas­es is need­ed and exam­ines key draft­ing issues that can be expect­ed to arise in state…

Read More

News 

Mar 012023

RESEARCH: History of Lynchings Linked to Increased Death Sentencing for Black Defendants

Researchers based at the University of North Carolina found a strong sta­tis­ti­cal rela­tion­ship between the lev­el of racial resent­ment in a state and the num­ber of death sen­tences hand­ed down on Black peo­ple. In par­tic­u­lar, racial resent­ment was a stronger pre­dic­tor of Black death sen­tenc­ing rates than con­ser­v­a­tive ide­ol­o­gy, even when con­trol­ling for sev­er­al fac­tors such as homi­cide and vio­lent crime rates. Writing in the Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, the authors noted:…

Read More

News 

Feb 282023

NEW RESOURCES: Interactive Display Illustrates Conditions on Death Row

A joint research project begun by two Texas uni­ver­si­ties illus­trates the con­fine­ment con­di­tions of death-row pris­on­ers, includ­ing areas such as vis­i­ta­tion, health care, attor­ney vis­its, recre­ation, food, and oppor­tu­ni­ties for work. The Capital Punishment & Social Rights Research Initiative has cre­at­ed an ini­tial info­graph­ic describ­ing the conditions in…

Read More

News 

Feb 272023

Former Oklahoma Corrections Officials Criticize Relentless Pace of Executions”

In a let­ter to Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond, dat­ed January 13, 2023, nine for­mer Oklahoma Department of Corrections (ODOC) offi­cials called atten­tion to the trau­ma expe­ri­enced by prison staff from repeat­ed exe­cu­tions. The relent­less pace of exe­cu­tions means the prison nev­er real­ly returns to nor­mal oper­a­tions after the emo­tion­al and logis­ti­cal upheaval of an exe­cu­tion,” explained the officials. Indeed, reports from the Oklahoma State Penitentiary describe near-constant mock…

Read More

News 

Feb 232023

U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Arizona Ruling That Barred Death Row Appeal

In a 5 – 4 deci­sion in Cruz v. Arizona on February 22, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court held that John Cruz should have been able to inform his sen­tenc­ing jury that if he were spared a death sen­tence, he nev­er would have been eli­gi­ble for parole. The Court said that its hold­ing was in direct line with its pre­vi­ous deci­sions in Simmons v. South Carolina and Lynch v. Arizona, which estab­lished this right and its spe­cif­ic applic­a­bil­i­ty to Arizona. This rul­ing not only allows…

Read More